<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/815187</link>
		<description>Comments by Steele</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Reader Question: Have Movies Gotten Worse Over the Last Ten Years? </title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/02/21/reader-question-have-movies-gotten-worse-over-the-last-ten-years/#IDComment129851118</link>
<description>Some of it comes down to money.  The studios strive for the one big hit movie that will pay for their operation for whole year.  They gamble big, too.  500 million dollars to make non-stop thrill rides packed with heart pulsing action and amazing special effects.  Unfortunately, non-stop action leaves no room for a good story.  It&amp;#039;s taken a while, but audiences have realized how empty these movies are.  The smaller more independent-ish films are far better than the blockbusters, but even when they&amp;#039;re bad, they do surprisingly well, because audiences are craving a more genuine experience and complete storylines.  How else can you explain the success of films like &amp;quot;The Room&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Paranormal Activity&amp;quot;?    The business of movie making desperately wants a consistent money making formula, but there isn&amp;#039;t one.  The best movies are unique.  When one slips through the studio process and becomes a big hit, then there&amp;#039;s a race to copy it as many times as possible before it stops producing money.  I don&amp;#039;t see the cycle breaking any time soon. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2011/02/21/reader-question-have-movies-gotten-worse-over-the-last-ten-years/#IDComment129851118</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sanctimonious Lawrence O&#039;Donnell Smugly Challenges Ann Coulter on Liberals&#039; Charitable Giving</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sanctimonious-lawrence-odonnell-smugly-challenges-ann-coulter-on-liberals-charitable-giving/#IDComment117661649</link>
<description>Ann Coulter&amp;#039;s argument is factual.  Lawrence O&amp;#039;Donnell&amp;#039;s is emotional.  It&amp;#039;s a perfect example of the dichotomy of thought between the American Right vs. Left.    Heavy regulation and high taxes inhibit economic growth vs. The evil Rich are GREEDY.  The Urban Heat Island effect shows a false rise in temperature data as cities grow around weather stations vs. Polar Bears are going to DIE on melting icebergs!  Abortion ends the life of developing human beings vs. The mean Republicans want innocent mothers to DIE during dangerous back alley abortions.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sanctimonious-lawrence-odonnell-smugly-challenges-ann-coulter-on-liberals-charitable-giving/#IDComment117661649</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Email Reveals ABC News Walked Back &#039;Bigs&#039; Publisher Participation in Election Night Coverage</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/10/31/email-reveals-abc-news-walked-back-bigs-publisher-participation-in-election-night-coverage/#IDComment107170339</link>
<description>The Left is terrified of you because you expose their tactics.   ABC is terrified of the Left because they&amp;#039;ve seen their actions.    Take care of yourself, Andrew.  You do great work and we need you. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/10/31/email-reveals-abc-news-walked-back-bigs-publisher-participation-in-election-night-coverage/#IDComment107170339</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : White House Confirms Jon Stewart&#039;s &#039;Tool of Democratic Party&#039; Status</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/10/28/white-house-confirms-jon-stewarts-tool-of-democratic-party-status/#IDComment106744468</link>
<description>Jon Stewart is an exceptional propagandist for his own political views - which are almost exclusively liberal -, but I don&amp;#039;t believe he&amp;#039;s a puppet of the DNC.  He builds up his credibility often by taking a common sense position that differs from the Liberal Establishment Media&amp;#039;s narrative and occasionally asking a tough question in an interview.  But it would be a mistake to think Stewart was an impartial, or even honest, news source.  His first priority is to be entertaining.  Being a shill for the Democrats is somewhat less important, but he does that too. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/10/28/white-house-confirms-jon-stewarts-tool-of-democratic-party-status/#IDComment106744468</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : O&#039;Keefe Owes His Supporters an Explanation</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/10/01/okeefe-owes-his-supporters-an-explanation/#IDComment101913379</link>
<description>I agree.  James O&amp;#039;Keefe has a sterling record up until this event.  He owes US an explanation and WE owe him a fair and objective, if informal, hearing.  I am completely willing to accept a reasonable explanation.  Without one, CNN&amp;#039;s version of events does look very bad.  Of course, CNN wasn&amp;#039;t exactly a trustworthy source of information about the Landrieu&amp;#039;s phone-line verification attempt...  Assuming there is a reasonable explanation, O&amp;#039;Keefe would be wise to speak up quickly while the story is hot.  The establishment media will happily bury any retractions or corrections if they can consider them &amp;quot;old news&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Oct 2010 02:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/10/01/okeefe-owes-his-supporters-an-explanation/#IDComment101913379</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Vast Majority of Americans Like the Internet Just the Way It Is</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/smotley/2010/09/29/the-vast-majority-of-americans-like-the-internet-just-the-way-it-is/#IDComment101641269</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d be in favor of making a .KID for only child-safe content and leaving the rest of the internet as-is.  Parents, like myself, that don&amp;#039;t want their kids seeing offensive materials could easily limit access to only .KID sites. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/smotley/2010/09/29/the-vast-majority-of-americans-like-the-internet-just-the-way-it-is/#IDComment101641269</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Labor Day Special:  Breitbart vs. Trumka</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/labor-day-special-breitbart-vs-trumka/#IDComment97489186</link>
<description>Prove it.  Put up or shut up.  You&amp;#039;ll be $100,000 richer if you can.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/labor-day-special-breitbart-vs-trumka/#IDComment97489186</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : The Decline and Fall of &lt;i&gt;Time Magazine&lt;/i&gt;: This Week&#039;s Anti-Semitic Cover</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/robmiller/2010/09/07/the-decline-and-fall-of-time-magazine-this-weeks-anti-semitic-cover/#IDComment97486925</link>
<description>Your arguments are nonsense.  Israel occupied the West Bank for a while in order to stop attacks from the Palestinians, then gave it back to them.  The settlers in a disputed area of Gaza were forcibly evacuated by The Israeli government a few years ago.   If they didn&amp;#039;t recognize the Palestinian people, then why did they do those things?    If Israel&amp;#039;s confused about who speaks for the Palestinians, that&amp;#039;s because the Palestinians themselves can&amp;#039;t decide who&amp;#039;s in charge.  Israel is perfectly willing to deal with a legitimate representative chosen by the Palestinians.  They&amp;#039;ve tried many times in the past, only to be told that the representative they dealt with wasn&amp;#039;t legitimate by the Palestinians.  Palestine needs to quit playing these games and deal honestly if they want peace.  But, obviously, they don&amp;#039;t.    If the USA and the Chinese were on opposite sides of a world war and the Chinese won, not only would I accept a small (Tibetan?) country in part of Idaho, I&amp;#039;d feel grateful if I could keep my sovereignty with only that small concession.  And I&amp;#039;d gladly take any refugees into my own state and help them get back on their feet.  I certainly wouldn&amp;#039;t leave those refugees in camps outside of New Tibet for 50 years. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Sep 2010 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/robmiller/2010/09/07/the-decline-and-fall-of-time-magazine-this-weeks-anti-semitic-cover/#IDComment97486925</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : The Decline and Fall of &lt;i&gt;Time Magazine&lt;/i&gt;: This Week&#039;s Anti-Semitic Cover</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/robmiller/2010/09/07/the-decline-and-fall-of-time-magazine-this-weeks-anti-semitic-cover/#IDComment97473777</link>
<description>Realizing that your enemies will settle for nothing short of your complete annihilation is not the same thing as rejecting peace.  The Israelis are the only ones that actually want peace.  They are the only ones willing to live in a peaceful state side-by-side with a Palestinian state.  They&amp;#039;ve shown their willingness to compromise over and over again.  Giving back the West Bank.  Forcibly removing their own citizens from disputed settlements. Etc.  It&amp;#039;s done no good because the Palestinians and the bulk of the Middle East have never ever wanted peace. The Palestinians launch rockets into Israel so often that it doesn&amp;#039;t even get reported on any more.  The news media only bothers to report when Israel decides to fight back, and then it&amp;#039;s only to condemn their desire to defend themselves.    Unless the Palestinians change their minds and embrace the peace that has been offered to them over and over again, this situation will never be settled without war.    And, as an American, I think we should fully support our Israeli allies the next time they are attacked.  We said that we would fight terrorism anywhere in the world.  We should put our money where our mouth is. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/robmiller/2010/09/07/the-decline-and-fall-of-time-magazine-this-weeks-anti-semitic-cover/#IDComment97473777</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Film Review: Everything Wrong with Hollywood Can Be Summed Up with the Word &#039;Predators&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/07/31/film-review-everything-wrong-with-hollywood-can-be-summed-up-with-the-word-predators/#IDComment90108870</link>
<description>I just saw Predators the other night.  It could have been a good movie except for one serious flaw.  Absolutely none of the characters were remotely likeable.  I understand that the concept of the film was to have a bunch of human &amp;quot;predators&amp;quot; because, realistically, the alien hunters would enjoy the thrill of hunting a group of bad-asses that wouldn&amp;#039;t have any moral qualms about fighting back... But, and this is important, this was supposed to be an ENTERTAINING movie, not a hunting documentary.  The writers made a very big mistake.  This movie needed some heroes.  The closest we got was a Yakusa hit-man...  and that&amp;#039;s only because he barely spoke.  If he had said anything else, I&amp;#039;m sure we&amp;#039;d hate him, too.  The reason the movie failed was because - with no likeable hero - it was impossible to care that these guys were being killed off one by one.  If you go back and watch the original Predator, you&amp;#039;ll see that nearly every one of the characters was likeable in one way or another.  The geeky guy that told dirty jokes.  &amp;quot;I ain&amp;#039;t got time to bleed.&amp;quot;  Dry-razor-gonna-have-me-some-fun guy.  Super tracker and knife fighting Cherokee.  And Arnold as Arnold.  They were all cool.  And when you saw them die, it made you angry!  You didn&amp;#039;t just want the heroes to survive - you wanted revenge!  That&amp;#039;s how a great action movie works.   I just don&amp;#039;t get why these Hollywood producers will dump millions of dollars into these movies when they have such basic flaws.  Maybe they don&amp;#039;t understand what makes a movie good, but they should - at the very least - understand what will obviously make one bad. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Aug 2010 05:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/07/31/film-review-everything-wrong-with-hollywood-can-be-summed-up-with-the-word-predators/#IDComment90108870</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : SEIU Posts AZ Propaganda Video Linking GOP With Fascists</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/seiu-posts-az-propaganda-video-linking-gop-with-fascists/#IDComment89794782</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m pretty sure that the 2 times interment camps were set up in America, that Democrats did the deed.  And that they interned American citizens, not illegal aliens that were invading the country.    Of course, the facts can&amp;#039;t be allowed to get in the way of a good demonization of patriotic Americans that just want the law to be enforced, can they? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/seiu-posts-az-propaganda-video-linking-gop-with-fascists/#IDComment89794782</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Dell Tech Support Grabs Nude Photos From Customer&#039;s Computer, Publishes on Web</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/dell-tech-support-grabs-nude-photos-from-customers-computer-publishes-on-web/#IDComment89792107</link>
<description>Oh man... this is Armageddon for outsourced tech support.  People were already fed up with getting computer help from non-native English speakers - that&amp;#039;s the #1 complaint of customers about tech support.  Now customers will realize that the technicians in foreign countries, when they remotely connect to their computers are not only able to adjust settings, but can copy their personal files and release them on the internet or use them in other malicious ways.  Every IT professional has understood the security risks from the beginning, but the general public will be terrified once they understand... Dell and other companies would be wise to stop this practice ASAP.  Dell can probably be held accountable for this, but the actual criminal is a citizen of India.  I highly doubt he&amp;#039;ll be punished. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/dell-tech-support-grabs-nude-photos-from-customers-computer-publishes-on-web/#IDComment89792107</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Indiana Planned Parenthood Caught On Tape Giving Fabricated Medical Information </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/indiana-planned-parenthood-caught-on-tape-giving-fabricated-medical-information/#IDComment87780825</link>
<description>Waiting until it&amp;#039;s an actual problem? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/indiana-planned-parenthood-caught-on-tape-giving-fabricated-medical-information/#IDComment87780825</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : JournoList: Ezra Klein’s Secretive Conspiracy</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jsexton/2010/07/20/journolist-ezra-kleins-secretive-conspiracy/#IDComment87780344</link>
<description>&amp;quot;[...] journalists, policy experts and assorted other observers to share their insights with one another.&amp;quot;  I&amp;#039;ll be more likely to believe this description when I know how many Fox News journalists, experts and observers were invited to the party... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jsexton/2010/07/20/journolist-ezra-kleins-secretive-conspiracy/#IDComment87780344</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Indiana Planned Parenthood Caught On Tape Giving Fabricated Medical Information </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/indiana-planned-parenthood-caught-on-tape-giving-fabricated-medical-information/#IDComment87740619</link>
<description>Why does Planned Parenthood lie to encourage women to have abortions?  It&amp;#039;s obvious that they do.  I just don&amp;#039;t get why...  What do they have to gain by falsely claiming that a embryo or fetus isn&amp;#039;t alive or isn&amp;#039;t human?  I don&amp;#039;t like to assign the worst possible motive to people I disagree with, but I&amp;#039;m having a very hard time imagining a &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; motive. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/indiana-planned-parenthood-caught-on-tape-giving-fabricated-medical-information/#IDComment87740619</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Comedy Central&#039;s Stephen Colbert Challenges Americans to Do Jobs Illegals Won&#039;t</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggraham/2010/06/30/illegals-doing-jobs-americans-wont/#IDComment83495110</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s a shame.  Steven Colbert is really very funny when he&amp;#039;s doing something other than The Colbert Report.  His voice acting on the Adult Swim programs on Cartoon Network is fantastic.  Why does he want to do a show that just reinforces liberal group-think?  The money can&amp;#039;t be that good.  It&amp;#039;s just so boring.  The Daily Show is slanted to the left too, obviously, but at least it&amp;#039;s got a lot of entertainment value.  And sometimes Jon Stewart asks better questions that the mainstream media. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggraham/2010/06/30/illegals-doing-jobs-americans-wont/#IDComment83495110</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Should Christians Use Saul Alinsky’s Tactics in Exposing Corruption? </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/dgiles/2010/03/07/should-christians-use-saul-alinskys-tactics-in-exposing-corruption/#IDComment60217019</link>
<description>Lots of Alinsky-ites in these recent comments.  There&amp;#039;s an obvious attempt to make Hannah and James appear unethical by misinterpreting Christianity.  Being deceptive in order to fight corruption, evil, etc. is not unethical or sinful.  The Christian (and Jewish) ninth commandment is &amp;quot;Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.&amp;quot; not simply &amp;quot;not lie.&amp;quot;  The meaning of the ninth commandment is this - Don&amp;#039;t slander or libel.    It is unethical and sinful to accuse someone of doing something that they did not.  It is unethical and sinful to remain silent when you know that someone is being falsely accused.    It is not unethical and sinful to pretend to be a criminal in order to expose criminals&amp;#039; schemes.    In other words, it is not un-Christian to lie - if the lie is used to reveal the truth! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/dgiles/2010/03/07/should-christians-use-saul-alinskys-tactics-in-exposing-corruption/#IDComment60217019</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>