en-us http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/03/31/noah-shachtman-3/ Comments from Noah Shachtman http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/03/31/noah-shachtman-3/#IDComment139253014Due to the nature of military anthrax, the notion that one person could transmit the anthrax in the way it was delivered, is absurd. PNAC, BMI, FBI, NSA Sat, 2 Apr 2011 01:28:56 +0000http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/03/31/noah-shachtman-3/#IDComment139253014 http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/03/31/noah-shachtman-3/#IDComment139112943Most modern American conspiracy theories, including the one you're presenting here, are based on disbelief that America's military aggression is driven by religious fanaticism. Bruce Ivins was a nut case Christian Zionist fanatic. There's nothing more to be said in terms of motive. That's his motive, and that shows that he was unstable enough to kill himself. Truthers in general don't want to accept the fact that 9/11 was a response to Zionist aggression. There's an inertial component to America's military aggression in which the MICo wants to sustain itself. However, ideologically the aggressive part of it is almost entirely Zionistic in nature. Bruce Ivins is an example of that. Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:47:00 +0000http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/03/31/noah-shachtman-3/#IDComment139112943 http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/03/31/noah-shachtman-3/#IDComment139011839Scott/Philip/whatever his name is this week won't publicize this one, because it conclusively shows -- by definition -- that more than one person was involved. New York Times, Novem­ber 29, 2001, “A NATION CHALLENGED: OVERSEAS PUZZLE; U.S. Con­firms Anthrax in Chilean Letter” Among the let­ters sent in the 2001 Anthrax Attacks was a let­ter sent to CHILE and mailed from FLORIDA but post­marked ZURICH, SWITZERLAND. From the NY Times piece: "This let­ter con­tain­ing anthrax was mailed to Dr. Anto­nio Banfi, a pedi­a­tri­cian in San­ti­ago, Chile. Although the return address was Orlando, Florida, the post­mark was Zurich, Switzer­land. The let­ter was sent via DHL, which used a Swiss bulk mail ship­per in New York and a Swiss post­mark. Unlike the anthrax let­ters with U.S. addressees, the let­ter to Chile was mailed in a busi­ness enve­lope and had a type-written return address, a busi­ness in Florida. Dr. Banfi received the let­ter, but found it sus­pi­cious and gave it to the Chilean author­i­ties. No one is known to have been infected with anthrax from it. The let­ter baf­fled Amer­i­can and Chilean offi­cials because, they say, “as they dig deeper, noth­ing quite adds up.” Google it. Fri, 1 Apr 2011 04:18:27 +0000http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/03/31/noah-shachtman-3/#IDComment139011839