Bush: Mubarak Wanted Me To Invade Iraq : Info Comments

Iraqi

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:59:08 +0000

what are you trying to tell us mr bush ...that you are a puppet and because you are a shame to your country,so is mubarak ,so is bander bin shit sultan ...you are all of you PUPPET to zion...I think you need another shoe in your face this time,,, long live al-Zaidi the shoe thrower http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFVCEvSzSZw [youtube uFVCEvSzSZw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFVCEvSzSZw youtube]

identalias

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:06:04 +0000

Yeah . . . riiiiiight. Israel didn't want the US to attack Iraq, though. Uh huh. Stop your lying, War Criminal Bush.

identalias

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 04:05:27 +0000

Yeah . . . riiiiiight. Israel didn't want the US to Iraq, though. Uh huh. Stop your lying, War Criminal Bush.

Mr. Guest

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 01:40:21 +0000

Mubarak should know that sooner or later, it will be his time. He is stupid for aiding and abetting US foreign policy in the region. It will lead to his eventual demise. How long does he think the Egyptian public will stand for the crap he has been pulling? The guy's a dictator in fake democratic garb. But since he's faithful to US interests, he is protected.

jack Cohen

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:45:51 +0000

Amongst the people of the Arab world, not one single Arab has any respect for Mubarack or Abdullah or any other traitor and dictator...!

jack Cohen

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:40:51 +0000

No Arab dictator like Mubarak or Abdullah or any of those other traitors would like to see any other Nationalistic Arab power, on the top. They would like to see other Arab traitors on the take like them. The same applies to the so-called israel. If all the Arab nations unite under one clean leadership, israel will not last 24 hours...!

Alan Walsh

Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:09:14 +0000

Bush "cooked the books" about WMD to justify invasion (I think as a macho thing to get vengeance for Daddy), but this Arab "talking out of both sides of the mouth" thing does ring true. You can almost take it to the bank that whatever they're saying in public is not what they're pushing behind the scenes. The Arab leaders wanted Saddam neutered, but they weren't about to take a public stand; and they'd say just about anything behind the scenes to get their way - and "hinting about WMD" is just the way they'd do it.

Raymound Annonymous

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:55:37 +0000

(The UN Human Rights Council has concluded its Universal Periodic Review (UPR) with over 200 recommendations to the US to improve its rights record) http://tinyurl.com/34p7ttc

Follow the Facts

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:35:49 +0000

....OK...that little missive meant nothing to me....

bozh

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:17:34 +0000

piece lacks postulation or affirmation of actual cause [s] for egyptian ruling class' urging nato attack iraq. i postulate that one of the causes for arabs wanting an invasion of iraq, had been baathist there showing egypt, jordan how to treat own citizens. iraqis had free education and healthcare and no fascist is happy with that; thus, the exemplum had to be destroyed. a conclusion-- regardless how plausibble-- that iraq wld have used chemical weapons against other arab countries, forever remains a conclusion and never a fact. thus, cannot be, if one is sane, a casus belli. of course, it still needs proving that even arab dictators wanted u.s. to invade iraq. but by now we shld know that all wars are waged solely for land; there is no other causative factor for any war; save the war for helen. and even that cld be discounted as pure fantacy. so, let's be wary when a pol talks and in all probability in a doctoring way! no, i am not gonna read bush's book even if u paid me to that. he's just making a pile of money while killing 10 k trees. devil bless these bastards! tnx

Carol

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:04:52 +0000

Bush was never good with names. I think he meant to say Israel. Political leaders are usually unsettled by rioting constitutents and if they want to stay in power, don't defy them. We have plenty of evidence that the Bush Adminstration and Blair's boys, "sexed up" the intelligence to justify and invations. There are the meetings between Cheney and big oil, dividing up Iraqs resources before 9-11. Murbarak did not attend. Bush's book is selfing serving fiction. Bandar, maybe. He was with Bush the night of 9-11. Bandar in no way represents the Saudi people or all its leadership.

whispering truth

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 23:00:52 +0000

please i don't want to hear what he says in his book--heck i didn't want to hear him when he screwed this country the first time around--i just want to know when he gets arrested, and when the execution will be--ok?

tarazan

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:58:17 +0000

Bush is indirectly trying to make his point that Saddam had WMDS before the war of 2003 started, and he is using Mubarak of Egypt to make his point that he was right about illusive Saddam's WMDS and intent..

ali

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:54:27 +0000

Of course, the Bush Memoire is just the beginning of something bigger.. However there is some obvious truth in the Memoire.. The Muslims particularly the ARABs are deeply devided, hated and feared one another. You can tell by the fact that THERE are NO 2 ALLIED MUSLIM NATIONS. even they are neighbours. even between Pakistan and Bangladesh!!! They almost always stab one another's back for the WEST.. Indonesia vs Malaysia.. whereas the whole WESTERN NATIONS united UNDER ISRAEL.. I cannot escape the conclusion that Muslims are so stupid and the Jews are so clever.. And the Western peoples are so dumb slave

Hussein Kabil

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:05:51 +0000

If this turns to be true and because of the source one ought to be cautious and vigilant. The phraseology used by bush is shady. To say that Saddam will use his biological weapons against you (of course if he has them) is a mile away from telling Bush to attack Iraq. However such an action would be a typical Mubarak position; his behavior in 1991 was an indication of malleability and weakness. Again if an encouragement was given Mubarak ought to be tried for treason. Many Arab legal venues can take this responsibility; also he ought to be tried as a co-conspirator in the murder of about 2 million Iraqis, the displacement of 4-5 million human being, the destruction of a well established society, the nuclear poisoning of Iraq and a long list of crimes against humanity... again if this is true it should be an unforgivable crime.

Turtle

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 22:05:26 +0000

How is this relevant? Since when do client states have a real say? When both Egypt and KSA wanted the US to tell Israel to get out of Lebanon in 2006, did it mean anything to Bush? Did the "birth pangs of democracy" suddenly diminish in intensity due to their intervention? Why did their counsel hold such sway in Iraq, but not in Lebanon? Hazard a guess? T.

Bill Johnson

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:53:44 +0000

I really don't give a damn about Bush's book of recounting lies and silly excuses for his bloody terrorist crimes against humanity while in office and out. He belongs in jail or better still, the world would be better off if he had been aborted prior to birth.

David Kennedy

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:48:36 +0000

I guess ole George was put under great pressure from these Arabs. They sure know how to pressure a guy. I always knew he could never have thought up this kind of thing all by himself, good Christian an' all. Those damn pesky Arabs. They sure are always up to something, and usually it's no good.

AmmonRah001

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:32:10 +0000

How about Israel, it's Prime Minister and its Zionist in the White House?! Me thinks they exerted a much higher degree of influence than any Arab country.

al.caswa

Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:27:01 +0000

bush must be up to something... it does not appear he's concerned involving Egypt.. what is he thinking about.... another war between iraq or Iran and Egypt perhaps..?