<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">	<channel>		<title>Financial Wars: Attack is the Best Form of Defence Comments</title>		<language>en-us</language>		<link>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm</link>		<description>Comments from Financial Wars: Attack is the Best Form of Defence</description><item>
<title>loefingstonn</title><link>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm#IDComment609123688</link><description>The most import information from the article, imo, is the distinction between the weakness of the &amp;#039;gold dinar&amp;#039; project and the BRICS(T) initiative, with regard to the &amp;quot;earned&amp;quot;, as opposed to &amp;quot;created&amp;quot; monetary, classification.   Very important, instructive point.  Yet, the author Gorokhov speaks of natural resource-backed &amp;#039;money&amp;#039;, as opposed to the limitations of a gold-backed counterpart, but neglects to mention that raw resources aren&amp;#039;t worth a dime without &amp;#039;value&amp;#039; added by work forces, in the production of material goods.  There was a time when currencies were more or less based on the productive capacity of a population, even it wasn&amp;#039;t officially recognized as such.  Today, it is increasingly clear that currencies no longer have anything to do with practical commercial exchange but are exploited in and of themselves as commodities: armes de guerre.  It&amp;#039;s all well and good that the BRICS(T) are attempting to break out of $US imperial financial domination, but what in sum are these countries&amp;#039; aspirations? None of these countries&amp;#039; domestic and foreign policies indicate any particular enlightenment with regard to the necessities of their populations. .  </description><pubDate>Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:40:08 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm#IDComment609123688</guid></item><item>
<title>Nick Bester</title><link>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm#IDComment608979950</link><description>Pity . Such an interesting article draws only 2 comments.    </description><pubDate>Mon, 1 Apr 2013 15:03:58 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm#IDComment608979950</guid></item><item>
<title>Subluna</title><link>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm#IDComment608784138</link><description>&amp;quot;American bankers played a decisive role in the process, initially subordinating  themselves to the USA through the creation of the Federal Reserve System (FRS)...&amp;quot;    Is that true? I thought they tricked the US Congress in December 1913 in creating the Federal Reserve. The Ashkenazi Rothschilds would never subordinate themselves, they just get what they want. </description><pubDate>Mon, 1 Apr 2013 09:20:47 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm#IDComment608784138</guid></item><item>
<title>David Kennedy</title><link>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm#IDComment608729182</link><description>Every challenge is an opportunity, and a crisis even more so.  In this brilliant article, Alexander GOROKHOV describes the way in which crises are engineered so that opportunity for easy gains occur.  This is another, silent, form of warfare being waged by the USA against the rest of the world, including its supposed friends.  In every country there are opportunists willing to sell out their own side for easy gain.  This is a side of human nature that the US readily understands -- Bernays demonstrated this -- and just as readily exploits.  EVERY MAN HAS HIS PRICE ... as they say. </description><pubDate>Mon, 1 Apr 2013 07:29:26 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34471.htm#IDComment608729182</guid></item>	</channel></rss>