Quiet time: New federal law expands anti-free speech powers Comments

kawa

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:17:45 +0000

The furor has spoken once again, soon the secret service (That's the SS right?) will be wearing knee high black boots and carrying riding crops. I remember Hitler, his child army's & don't forget MMMMM, MMMMM, MMMMM as he was trying oi teach our children to chant, now they're putting his face on the flag. This is getting really serious folk.s

Lloyd

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:05:05 +0000

This is not the first time OUR CONSTITUTION has been violated in recent months, and we should know by now that OUR CONGRESS and OUR SUPREME COURT are making no effort to protect the people that they were put into office to do. Our country is headed toward a country ruled by the elite ruling class, with the majority of the citizens nothing but what is know to them as the "hoi poloi", or working class. In other words, slaves to their masters, with no word whatsoever in their government.

haroldson

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:04:37 +0000

How and why, how did the people of America get bull shi--ed in to putting this piece of garbage garbage in the white house? and why has there not been anyone in government with balls enough to stand up to him and when will we put people in power who can handle the job, We are getting closer to becoming a 3rd world country some one is getting rich while the public is bearing the brunt of this Idiot and his commie programs, Seems like we need new leaders and to start the state militias to take power away from washington. They have no right to over ride the local governments

Ted

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:01:24 +0000

So now all they have to do is throw up a barricade and POW! Your a felon and they can ship the whole lot to the nearest FEMA Camp.ACHTUNG CONSERVATIVES!!!!!

Lloyd

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:00:53 +0000

The very first Amendment to our Constitution, and part of OUR CONSTITUTION, simply and clearly states: "Article [I.] Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." making this law unconstitutional. Where is our Supreme Court, and what are they doing to protect our Constitution and the rights of the people? if we a re to continue living as a free and independent people, we have to do whatever is necessary to protect our rights.

jericho777

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:54:03 +0000

If this don't concern you non voting Christians out there, then you best read this, it will chisel away at your free speech. And your Christianity, your rights to openly acknowledge your heavenly Father, we need your help in stopping this, and the only way we can set them back, is by voting for those who will fight it from within. Please, prepare yourself to vote, we simply don't have the numbers without you. Please, lend us your voice & your vote to stop these kind of bills, and or restrictive laws!

Leah

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:53:39 +0000

This is some very extremely scary stuff folks! We have a genuine illegal Alien Muslim Marxist Communist infiltrator in our WhiteHouse and a Regime and the UN that is assisting him.!!! God Help us all!!! Live Free or Die!!!

Mattwm

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:47:00 +0000

how can someone be elected president, vow to uphold the constitution, when he hates what's in the constitution?

Richard Vandervort

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:42:59 +0000

If Americans everywhere don\'t awaken soon there will not be a reason to call this a free nation anymore because it will not be one anymore.
Obama and this whole administration must go and this means not in November but right now.
If third world country\'s can throw their unwanted leaders out just what\'s wrong with the people of the greatest nation on earth today.
Are we now what others see us to be? Weak and cowardly people that don\'t deserve freedom in their life and don\'t deserve respect in the worlds eyes?

vtdelacy

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:41:04 +0000

The First Amendment must remain a part of our Constitution and must continue to be respected or we lose our foundation as a nation. Rather than eliminating the First Amendment, let's get rid of Obama et. al. instead...ASAP!

Broke&sinking

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:36:28 +0000

I can't wait until this POS is out of office. Maybe we can get back to a free America as opposed to an ego driven Dictator of Amerika. God save the USA

steven

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:36:21 +0000

The obamination needs to go........make it disappear, the sight of it makes me want to puke!!!!

Dark_Archer

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:30:19 +0000

THEIR ALL TRAITORS !!!!

Mattwm

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:26:41 +0000

Lee Harvey Oswald didn't need to be on ground near the president to do his deed.

Klaus

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:20:59 +0000

Well, that just proves that the entire congress needs to be replaced. I was hoping that at least there would be enough conservatives to vote against something like this, but apparently not. How utterly disgusting and un-American

poacher

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:08:16 +0000

was it jfk that said if you disallow peaceful redress you will get violent redress? or something like that? homeland security, ndaa, the patriot act, tsa; this makes five that i can think of. five major attacks on the bill of rights. others can probably add more.

susan

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:05:17 +0000

since both houses in congress passed this we need to get rid of them all everyone in washington are trying to take your God given rights way

SEAN MURRY

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:53:32 +0000

More bullcrap.

Dr. Duckenheimer

Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:42:15 +0000

"There is a conservative who has opposed this kind of expansion of federal power in Congress for decades, and he is running for President." I like Ron Paul, but his foreign policy is blah blah blah blah.... They'll make any excuse to justify their choice because they don't want to be wrong. That and they can't seem to make the connection that the same decision makers who put up these bills are the same people that make decisions on current foreign policy.