Sen. Bernie Sanders: Exposing Secrets of the Fed Comments

BEN PENDLETON

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 01:38:16 +0000

DYLAN: PLEASE EXPLAIN THAT THE FED IS PRIVATELY OWNED. EXPLAIN ON AIR HOW THE FED WAS FORMED, AND THAT IT IS NOT A GOVERNMENT AGENCY. IF YOU DO NOT DO THIS THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL NOT UNDERSTAND HOW TRULY DANGEROUS THE FED IS, AND HOW POLITICIANS ARE HELPLESS TO REGULATE THE FED. THANK YOU.

Sean

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:18:14 +0000

Who are the 18? Can we have names please.

Arlene Russell

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:24:04 +0000

I find it difficult to stomach this Congress. Our lawmakers have delivered up our nation to six big banks and Wall Street and obviously think it should be okay with the people of this nation. I want money out of politics. I want public funds not to be used to guarantee private parties on Wall Street, in brokerage firms and big banks and corporations can gamble with impunity. The cost has been to families who have lost homes, old folks who have lost their pensions and the middle class. For what? Simply because the few who purport to be the job makers, who purport to pay 70% of the taxes in truth own half the country and pay no taxes. Those occupying Wall Street are there to take back control of our government, our financial system and the future of the United States of America. The war is not against some terrorist on a foreign shore. our enemies are within.

Stone

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 02:50:23 +0000

Give credit where it is due...Ron Paul has been the leading voice on this issue for decades! I promise he is the only candidate on stage last night who is honest about pulling back the curtain on the Fed. This issue alone should disqualify Herman Cain. The FED as Paul says is the greatest threat, because without the FED actions those on Wall Street would not have been able to pull of the great heist of 2008-2011 and the wars would end.

Jamie

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 01:44:17 +0000

Given that much of the money from the election cycle flows into news corporations, I wonder how long until GE has this guy fired?

Jamie

Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:19:02 +0000

Given that much of the money from the election cycle flows into news corporations, I wonder how long until GE has this guy fired? I'm grateful for the coverage, but worry that MSNBC is cooking the industry golden goose, something the big-wigs probably won't appreciate very much.

Sam Bright

Wed, 19 Oct 2011 23:58:03 +0000

"In international law, odious debt is a legal theory that holds that the national debt incurred by a regime for purposes that do not serve the best interests of the nation, should not be enforceable. Such debts are, thus, considered by this doctrine to be personal debts of the regime that incurred them and not debts of the state. In some respects, the concept is analogous to the invalidity of contracts signed under coercion." Read more about this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odious_debt We ought to be able to use this law to force the banksters to buy back their bad assets and then abolish the Fed.