Burrowing your words, you might be the goon when Newt is attacking Mitt's claim as being a 'job creator' and not attacking Capitalism. That was spun off by the media including the supposed conservative media which seems to be successfully influencing many weak minds.
Actually I think none of them want to work with Newt because they will no longer be able to do business as usual and actually have to work and make deals?! Which means no more pleasing the lobbyist and working for the people, yeah that's an awfull thing.
Thank you. You made me feel sane.
I am really puzzled how people are drinking this kool-aid. Don't you think it's wierd how Mitt machine spent so much attacking Newt but no one criticized Mitt claiming it is done by the superpac. But when Newt's superpac goes out, they point to Newt and he's portrayed as the one feeding ammo to Obama. What is this BIAS?
That same Newt was probably the ONLY person who fought hard against Gore and Pelosi's global warming BS. You seem to be already on Mitt's propaganda wagon claiming such blunt lie. I'm still trying hard to find what exactly Newt said that is attacking Capitalism. Newt is just calling out on Mitt claiming he's a job creator while the record shows otherwise. And that is an attack on Capitalism? HOW? Please, and this to all brainwashed Mitt fans, wake up and smell the coffee.
Gingrich should be the clear choice, but so far it seems that everyone wants the same in WH just a different label after the name (R). As much as Mitt claims his experience in the private sector, he's shown all he did was to spread the wealth as he'll do just that to his piling supporters endorsing him and expecting for that huge payout once he's in office.
Here's a food for thought. As a generalization let me lay down the common impression of conservatives: religious and strict to law. There's evidence that some with religious faith disagrees the teaching of 'evolution' or anything that is against their belief. That restricts one's mind. Knowing something and believing something is completely different thing. But somehow, and some 'conservatives' knowing these other information themselves wants it kept away from their children. That isn't 'intellectual' thinking, it's emotional. And on the law end of the story. Conservatives want less government involvement, less regulation while many want censorship. I won't go and explain this one, think about it, it ain't smart either. When knowing everything you can is considered being intellectual, conservatives tend to restrict too much. That's why people like Gutfeld is refreshing for conservatives. Open up conservatives, it's okay to know and choose the 'right' way. Conservatives=Self responsible
Polls are for those that can't make up their own mind.
So he's selling a good story, something some agree and praise for voicing their mind, and what's his evil plot behind this that he's going to benefit? Money? It's no secret that he's in an entertainment business. Nothing I can think wrong about CPAC hiring someone that can display what motivates the people at the meeting. I just don't see the con aspect.
I agree, major spoiler for those who didn't see it.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Creation