zomerset_John

zomerset_John

77p

215 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

12 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 1 reply · +2 points

"While it may 'only be a few percent of natural emissions, it still results in a few percent added year on year and it cannot be denied that We now stand to double or even triple carbon dioxide in the atmosphere"
I would be grateful if you can prove to me conclusively what the total of these natural emissions are so we can compare to the estimated human contribution. Not just a link to a site but prove that a few percent of total natural emissions = human contribution of CO2.
Humans tripling atmospheric CO2:-
Doubling would mean humans adding 100% of natural atmospheric CO2 per year and tripling 200% and that's neglecting CO2 which already exists in the atmosphere!

12 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 0 replies · +12 points

Add to that the money the E.U owes us since it was all illegal in the first place!

12 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 1 reply · +9 points

The ruling traitors want to bring in as many 'undesirables' as fast as possible so they can bring about a breakdown in civil order and thus instil authoritarian control. We see this with the bill currently at the House of Lords, which has the potential to make lawful street protest 'unlawful' which uses the smokescreen of tackling street hooliganism. The British people are a tolerant race and will put up with almost anything thrown at them, but is sure as hell will test us to the limit in the near future, but we have to put up with it as we are not prepared collectively to oppose - yet!

12 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 0 replies · +8 points

Fathers used to be forced by court order to pay maintenance for their child, usually this was a weekly amount which they took to the local Police Station from where the mother would collect it. This was before state benefit was paid to single mothers. Usually the father would comply but there were also many who would evade being detected but very rare they would do something as demented as kill his own offspring. It is interesting to note that it is often single childless(at present) working woman who object(quite rightly so) to having to help support other women and their children(often by multiple fathers) all living on state benefit.
But perhaps these are the ones who are keeping the white indigenous population from disappearing as career and professional women seem not have time to have children or maybe just one!

12 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - The British Resistance... · 0 replies · +8 points

The lady in question was aged 73 and it was Sainsbury's not Tescos.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2477153/D...
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/sainsbury%E2%...

14 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - Paganism: A Brief Resp... · 0 replies · +2 points

So I'm correct in stating that Bertrand Russell is one you identify with and admire, almost as if he's your idol or one to put up as someone you like to imagine yourself as similar too?
As to Russell's communist beliefs have you not read:
The last chapter of Russell's book THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF BOLSHEVISM?
"The fundamental ideas of communism," he says, "are by no means impracticable, and would, if realized, add immeasurably to the well-being of mankind." So, at least, communism is a worthwhile ideal to struggle for it seems.
It is strange, however, for a logician such as Russell not to realize that the fundamental ideas of communism logically rest upon Marx's theory of value and since, in other places, he rejects that theory he should think them to be impracticable!
As to your assertion that Jews are responsible for fraud, war, crimes and so on. Well that has to be said of any group of people logically and I think you chose your words carefully there and of course it's not your fault but what is your fault is taking Bertrand Russell's beliefs on religion(Christian here) and communism and pontificating them on a nationalist site which hopes to attract many people who quite frankly are very 'put off' by these very things - something Bertrand Russell also couldn't get his head round incidentally!

14 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - Nationalists Vow &ldqu... · 0 replies · +7 points

I don't think she has a mental illness as such, any different to what 100,000s have. It more likely she has suffered much from having to grow up and live in the multicultural hellhole, being treated as second class citizen where English language is becoming less used to the point she can't be understood in her own country and she has had to endure these journeys where she is almost(if not the only) the only white person. It was the time of the month for her and she probably felt already low and she got some abuse from someone(or more) and she just let fly. Yes, they will try to make out she has a mental illness but she doesn't,. She is completely normal and what she said came from the heart and for that can be no right time and place.

14 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - Kelly Hollingsworth, E... · 0 replies · +6 points

It's quite true, white people don't often have a revolution. It does happen though: English revolution 1688; French & European revolutions 1848. So ruling elites take note - it's not beyond the realms of possibility if you keep pushing whitey around.

14 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - I am an Englishman · 0 replies · +2 points

ZacSlack:

With reference to your scepticism about sex education for very young kiddies at school please follow this recent link: http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/regional/activists-pro...

14 years ago @ http://thebritishresis... - I am an Englishman · 3 replies · +2 points

I think it's quite a bit more than homos are now prepared to admit it because society is much more tolerant. The homos groups are forever pushing for more and more equality: Church marriages; sleeping together in guest houses and winning massive compensation; equality of benefits; teaching of sex to 5 year olds; adoption and so on. I think if sex is taught from a biological standpoint only then this should be reserved for those that are studying biology since nobody needs to learn the fors and whys of sex - it's just natural surely?
All this is aided and abtted by the ruling elites as a means of degrading and destroying the masculinity and femininity of us indigenous whites. Can you prove me wrong? What normal child needs to learn about sex in school? Can't you see that this is really perverted nonsense from the ruling elites pushing the agenda through homos and even more so, lesbians?