Who would've thunk it, that Pro-life would be controversial. Just a few decades ago, it was the other way around.

You're quoting SEIU? Really?

Don't take my word for it. Look it up! As for their ultimate goal.. I have no idea what the current goal is. I'm just saying that both Margaret Sanger and George Bernard Shaw were eugenists. Among other notable eugenists were Adolph Hitler.
However, the facts that are easily obtainable are: that there are an inordinate amount of abortions performed on the black community compared with other races. This has been cause for questions to come up. Whether it's coincidence or not, I don't know.

Do you have any other way of expressing yourself than throwing in the term right wing?
I agree with you about blame being assigned to companies that choose to exploit cheap labor by hiring illegals, but it's not like these guys were advertising in Mexico, and organizing coyotes to lead them to the promised land. These people came over into this country, knowingly violating our laws. The employers were obviously opportunistic, but if they didn't have the supply of ready and available workers, they wouldn't be hiring illegals.
Let's not try to pin all of our anger on the employers.. the common denominator are those that would enter illegally in the first place.
Mexico has it right with their laws. If you get caught in that country illegally, you get jail time of 2 years. You get caught a second time, you get ten years. You want to be a citizen of Mexico, you must have a certain amount of cash available, provide your own medical insurance, and you aren't allowed to move anywhere you want in Mexico. They have regional demographic considerations. ie.. they don't want too many of a particular race concentrated in any one area. Look it up.. I did.
If we didn't dole out the free goodies so readily, we might not have so much of a problem as we do now.
Reagan granted amnesty to 3 million with the understanding that the border would be sealed. Boy did he get bamboozled.

You're absolutely correct with the above statement. She was a Eugenist, just like others like George Bernard Shaw etc.
Most people out there don't realize or care enough to see what's going on. Sure they do some good things, but that doesn't outweigh the bad, and only perpetuates the original mission statement.

I won't support Komen anymore because they went back with their tail between their legs.

What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
Patrick Henry

Those who would give up Essential Liberty
to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson

Well we didn't see this coming! So much for the Arab spring.

I cringe every time I see on the news the continuous coverage of this incident. What about all the other crimes that happen. Crimes that are worse in their nature. It must not be news worthy if it's black on white violence. It must not be news worthy if the purveyors of hate and racism Al Sharpton, and Jess Jackson aren't on the scene. It must not be news worthy if the community doesn't rally around, make tee shirts and bumper stickers, and ransack businesses in protest. I am so completely tired of the media putting in a check valve on violence, that only goes one way when it involves a person of color. I don't see the people lining up for the poor 13 year old boy in Kansas City who was doused with gasoline and set on fire by two black kids who screamed "you deserve this white boy!!" No.. apparently this poor kids only fault was that he was white, and it wasn't the reverse, because if it was, well then apparently it would've been a heinous crime worthy of the national news.

What about the 13 year old boy in Kansas City, who was doused with gasoline and set on fire? His two assailants who were black, said "you deserve this white boy" Where is the outcry? Where is the MSM? This was a hate crime.. but instead the powers-that-be are silent. Where are Al and Jesse? The outrage is only reserved for a chosen few.

I suggest you read the US Constitution. Being a signatory in the UN in no way trumps or is even legally binding to the United States Constitution or the Bill of Rights. We are a sovereign nation, and there is no allowance to use any other third party as a proxy to usurp our founding documents.

So my statement still stands. Your thinking that Health Insurance should be a "Right" as expressed in the Bill of Rights, is just fanciful thinking.