yep and God help us if we get attacked. all of BHO's minions and blind supporters will be blaming Bush. Bush 43 wasn't perfect, but he sure did a lot to prevent a 2nd attack. and although a lot of clinton's actions and non-actions played A PART in 9/11, i didn't hear ANY blame-Clinton rhetoric. I'm glad Clinton wasn't blamed, but if we're attacked, I don't want to hear a blame Bush campaign. It was the hijackers' and their supporters' fault we were attacked and if we're attacked again, it'll be the attackers' faults too.
Does anyone find it tragically ironic that the president who is quickly eroding our freedoms, making all nice-nice with our enemies, and apologizing to everyone, calling the US bad, is in charge of celebrating the president who fought for the freedom of East Germany and USSR, called our enemies to task, and fought for the values we hold dear? It just makes me ill. Reagan should be celebrated, but by ummmm, BHO? NO! SAY IT AIN'T SO! I just feel like the US has just been slapped in the face by this tragic irony.
i agree. one major reason why marijuana is still illegal is because of the big tobacco companies. tobacco-laden cigarettes are just as bad and can be considered a "gateway" drug, but they're legal because they've had great lobbiests (sorry about the unsure spelling) throughout the years. i grew up in the east where tobacco is really big.
i'm for making cigarettes illegal and for making marijuana a prescription drug. yes, there are medicinal benefits to marijuana, and it's not right that people who need it can not have it prescribed to them.
i didn't vote for him either. some people say you get what you voted for. umm, i didn't. i didn't vote for this! in fact, i voted AGAINST this. yet, i'm still being subjected to this.
going to canada? nope. canada's in pretty bad shape too. so, we won't really have that option.
can't she be both a fool and a liar? she's a liar, well, because her mouth moves (how do you tell that a liar is lying? her lips move!). she's a fool because she believes her own vile she spews.
ouch, my eyes! they burn!
will do. and thank you for calling it what it is. INFANTICIDE. this issue hurts me to the core. it shows what our society is made of. if we murder (and yes, it's MURDER) the most innocent of our citizens, then what's next? s***, i think we're seeing the "what's next" and it makes me shudder in fear.
exactly! although i don't oppose the "morning after pill," i do oppose it being readily available to minors without parental consent. they can't get prescription allergy pills without parental notification, why this one? i'll tell you, it's all politically driven. these people don't care about the girls. all they care is to get their "Feel good" agenda across and sadly, it's working. no longer is "just say no to premarital sex" seen as realistic. now it's "oh, teens are gonna have sex, so we need to equip them with all the protection they can get." so-called "safe sex" has replaced abstinence. i'm sort of glad we're beyond the shunning, as only the girls were shunned (since they carry the visible evidence if they're pregnant and too bad men's noses don't turn blue or something). however, i wish we had a healthy balance between the shunning of old and this glorifying of premarital/teenage sex. i just want to shout YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE SEX, PEOPLE!
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Ruckus