<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/494569</link>
		<description>Comments by winteryknight</description>
<item>
<title>Living Dead Man : Wintery Knight&#039;s Top Ten Resources on the Resurrection</title>
<link>http://blog.livingdeadman.org/index.php/2010/03/01/wintery-knights-top-ten-resources-on-the-resurrection/#IDComment59218037</link>
<description>Cool! Thanks for the link.I like your blog&amp;#039;s theme! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.livingdeadman.org/index.php/2010/03/01/wintery-knights-top-ten-resources-on-the-resurrection/#IDComment59218037</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BIG BLUE WAVE : The Difference Between Pro-Choice and Pro-Abortion</title>
<link>http://bluewavecanada.blogspot.com/2009/12/difference-between-pro-choice-and-pro.html#IDComment49553607</link>
<description>Did you reverse &amp;quot;choices&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; near the end there? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bluewavecanada.blogspot.com/2009/12/difference-between-pro-choice-and-pro.html#IDComment49553607</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BIG BLUE WAVE : VIDEO: Detroit in ruins -- new clip from Steve Crowder</title>
<link>http://bluewavecanada.blogspot.com/2009/12/video-detroit-in-ruins-new-clip-from.html#IDComment48860038</link>
<description>Suzanne, thanks for posting. Crowder is Canadian-raised born in Detroit. What a scary city! Unions, democrats and dependency...  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bluewavecanada.blogspot.com/2009/12/video-detroit-in-ruins-new-clip-from.html#IDComment48860038</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BIG BLUE WAVE : Efforts to Boost Birth Rate Failing in China</title>
<link>http://bluewavecanada.blogspot.com/2009/12/efforts-to-boost-birth-rate-failing-in.html#IDComment47770922</link>
<description>Universal day care! Blech! That&amp;#039;s expensive and bad for children. They need to put money back into the hands of parents if they want parents to have more children.  Getting government out of the family&amp;#039;s business wouldn&amp;#039;t hurt either. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bluewavecanada.blogspot.com/2009/12/efforts-to-boost-birth-rate-failing-in.html#IDComment47770922</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BIG BLUE WAVE : Attention Commenters</title>
<link>http://bluewavecanada.blogspot.com/2009/12/attention-commenters.html#IDComment46870812</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s me, Wintery Knight. I hope this works!  Hey, did you see this story: &lt;a href=&quot;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/two-iranian-christian-women-released-from-iranian-prison-after-259-days/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/two...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bluewavecanada.blogspot.com/2009/12/attention-commenters.html#IDComment46870812</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Does God Exist? Hitchens vs. Craig</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dtennapel/2009/04/08/does-god-exist-hitchens-vs-craig/#IDComment18387401</link>
<description>For an explanation of Craig&amp;#039;s second argument, the argument from fine-tuning, check out this post which explains some of the cosmological constants and quantities that Craig mentioned. If you change these numbers even slightly from what they are, the universe would no longer support life. Either chemical diversity would be lost, or stars would not form, or the universe would have recollapsed early on, etc.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/is-there-scientific-evidence-for-an-intelligent-designer/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/is-...&lt;/a&gt;  The values of these constants and quantities are not caused by natural laws, they are selected by whoever or whatever is doing the creating. The vast majority of selections DO NOT support the minimal requirements for life of any kind. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 23:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dtennapel/2009/04/08/does-god-exist-hitchens-vs-craig/#IDComment18387401</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Does God Exist? Hitchens vs. Craig</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dtennapel/2009/04/08/does-god-exist-hitchens-vs-craig/#IDComment18387193</link>
<description>For those who are interested in understanding Craig&amp;#039;s first argument from the origin of the universe, I wrote an analysis of it here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/how-to-defend-the-kalam-cosmological-argument-just-like-william-lane-craig/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/how...&lt;/a&gt;  The technical name for it is the &amp;quot;kalam&amp;quot; cosmological argument.  Also, for those who are unfamiliar with how scholars argue for the resurrection using just a few of the most reliable historical &amp;quot;knowns&amp;quot;, check this out. &lt;a href=&quot;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/gary-habermas-explains-the-earliest-source-of-resurrection-facts/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/gar...&lt;/a&gt;  It turns out that the most reliable statement of the basic facts of the resurrection narrative go back to within FIVE YEARS of the death of Jesus. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 22:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dtennapel/2009/04/08/does-god-exist-hitchens-vs-craig/#IDComment18387193</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Does God Exist? Hitchens vs. Craig</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dtennapel/2009/04/08/does-god-exist-hitchens-vs-craig/#IDComment18364829</link>
<description>I wrote a play by play of the debate and posted it on my blog. It describes every point made during the debate on either side, but not the Q&amp;amp;A period.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/the-debate-so-far/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/the...&lt;/a&gt;  More summaries and comments from peope who attended are linked here:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/audio-from-wiliam-lane-craig-vs-christopher-hitchens-debate/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/aud...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dtennapel/2009/04/08/does-god-exist-hitchens-vs-craig/#IDComment18364829</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>