IntenseDebate - winteryknight

16 years ago @ Living Dead Man - Wintery Knight's Top T... · 0 replies · +1 points

Cool! Thanks for the link.I like your blog's theme!

16 years ago @ BIG BLUE WAVE - The Difference Between... · 0 replies · +1 points

Did you reverse "choices" and "consequences" near the end there?

16 years ago @ BIG BLUE WAVE - VIDEO: Detroit in ruin... · 0 replies · +2 points

Suzanne, thanks for posting. Crowder is Canadian-raised born in Detroit. What a scary city! Unions, democrats and dependency...

16 years ago @ BIG BLUE WAVE - Efforts to Boost Birth... · 0 replies · +1 points

Universal day care! Blech! That's expensive and bad for children. They need to put money back into the hands of parents if they want parents to have more children.

Getting government out of the family's business wouldn't hurt either.

16 years ago @ BIG BLUE WAVE - Attention Commenters · 0 replies · +1 points

It's me, Wintery Knight. I hope this works!

Hey, did you see this story:
http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/12/11/two...

17 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Does God Exist? Hitche... · 0 replies · +2 points

For an explanation of Craig's second argument, the argument from fine-tuning, check out this post which explains some of the cosmological constants and quantities that Craig mentioned. If you change these numbers even slightly from what they are, the universe would no longer support life. Either chemical diversity would be lost, or stars would not form, or the universe would have recollapsed early on, etc.

http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/is-...

The values of these constants and quantities are not caused by natural laws, they are selected by whoever or whatever is doing the creating. The vast majority of selections DO NOT support the minimal requirements for life of any kind.

17 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Does God Exist? Hitche... · 0 replies · +2 points

For those who are interested in understanding Craig's first argument from the origin of the universe, I wrote an analysis of it here:
http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/08/how...

The technical name for it is the "kalam" cosmological argument.

Also, for those who are unfamiliar with how scholars argue for the resurrection using just a few of the most reliable historical "knowns", check this out.
http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/03/gar...

It turns out that the most reliable statement of the basic facts of the resurrection narrative go back to within FIVE YEARS of the death of Jesus.

17 years ago @ Big Hollywood - Does God Exist? Hitche... · 0 replies · +1 points

I wrote a play by play of the debate and posted it on my blog. It describes every point made during the debate on either side, but not the Q&A period.

http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/the...

More summaries and comments from peope who attended are linked here:

http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2009/04/05/aud...

IntenseDebate Comment System

Description

Connect with winteryknight

My blogs/sites

People I'm following

winteryknight