waywordson

waywordson

50p

84 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

15 years ago @ Big Government - Obama Propaganda Expos... · 0 replies · +2 points

umm, kontora,
i don't have to paint it, (i doubt that original propagandist touched a paint brush) ,

i just run a picture trough my "gimp" program, and i can recreate that effect in a matter of minutes.

although, it would be sweet, to be able to get the government to pay me to work a mouse on my computer..

16 years ago @ Big Government - A Response to Mexican ... · 1 reply · -11 points

RSP misquotes t Mclintock, what he said (paraphrased) is he takes exception to the Mexican president making a speech criticizing the immigration law in a state of the us.

MSMedia critic......in the interest of accuracy, i must point out you misquoted RSP as well ,-)

RSP said "While some of my best friends are Mexicans I wouldn't want one to live next to one".

..... I'm not sure i can parse this statement, and it does raise some questions, so RPS..... is it in Mexico you don't want Mexicans living next to other Mexicans,? (and how does that work?), or are you calling for some kind of Mexican homeowner,renter quota in your neighborhood? (that is you don't mind Mexican neighbors, but only if they live in every other house?)

that being said, I'm not sure if this makes RPS anti-Hispanic, but regardless, his statement makes my brain hurt, so I'm going to go watch cartoons with my toddler for a wile

16 years ago @ Big Government - A Response to Mexican ... · 0 replies · +13 points

i voted for McClintock as Governor, but the establishment Cali-kavorkarepublican party decided once again to go with a swartzenrino, and assist the californian Demorats in the states ongoing suicide attempt.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Government: Destroyin... · 1 reply · +2 points

P.S. you may deny the roots of your proposed "well regulated capitalism" but its just yet another in the long list of labels given to the same thing (command control economics) and in the modern terms, "just putting lipstick on a pig"

of course you will just provide logical inconsistent evidence, say thats prof, and claim victory, as such, i am not responding to convince you,(as i have noted by your posts on this site, factual evidence has nothing to do with your ideology)

by responding, i am letting you hi-light the worthlessness of your viewpoint by making you defend it with false arguments.
so, i thank you for being the "faithless" opposition to our knowledge of economics, history, and constitution.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Government: Destroyin... · 1 reply · +2 points

what is an economy, well, for one, it is a neutral term, and can be characterized as good (prosperous) or bad (impoverished)

the U.S. economy was intended to be free agents, engaging in self interested Enterprise, under the color of just laws, instituted by a Representative republic government, limited by the authority of "God Given" Rights, set down in the Constitution of the United States.

the basis of the constitution is the economic "truth" studied and quantified by Adam smith, (the invisible hand), and the "self evident truths" observed by the founders of the United states.

then their's the discredited "command control economic" theory's proposed by Marx, Engels, and lord Keynes.

so, tell me when, and where the theory's of command control economy has been factualy proved to work, and where the "self evident truths" framed by the founders of the U.S. has not worked?.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Government: Destroyin... · 0 replies · +3 points

"Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc"

mike, you are free to believe what you will. but when you do so without proof of causation, it leads to logical fallacy.

it is an irrefutable FACT that it is overreaching by the progressives in congress, and the "progressive" Obama administrations' policy's that are the direct cause of the organization of the tea party's. this fact is supported by the current history of the tea party events, themselves.

in short, you have not offered proof of your assertion of racism with any historical fact... a blind repetition of your assertion is not proof, referring to the "Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc" arguments of any number of "expert" luminaries who give no real evidence, other than your own fallacy (Obama is black, therefore his is opposed because hes black) (G.Garifolio, et all), is not proof.

the only real provable evidence you cite is obama skin color.....
how does this square with the standard set out by the peaceful rebellion against government sponsored racism of the sixty's

"....i have a dream, that a man will be judged by the content of his character, rather than the color of his skin...." (paraphrasing. M,L. King)

16 years ago @ Big Government - As SEIU Terrorizes Ban... · 0 replies · +2 points

and as i read the story, at no time did the tea party protesters step foot on private property, that story was actually about Bank of Americas ridiculously overboard security reaction to a peaceful protest, the seiu protest became illegal once a union thugs "jackboot" hit privet property:" as for me i am outraged at the under reaction of the local police, and the media.

16 years ago @ Big Government - Must-Read of the Day: ... · 0 replies · +2 points

thats amazing, i could only get about a page and a half before my eyes glazed over, and i had to go wash out my brain. '-)

16 years ago @ Big Government - Must-Read of the Day: ... · 2 replies · +1 points

read every word? how did you develop such Olympian endurance?

16 years ago @ Big Government - Must-Read of the Day: ... · 0 replies · +1 points

actually, i take it into the exam room, reading the articles puts me to sleep faster than the anesthesia (I must admit, i only got trough one and a half paragraphs of the "Bribart" expose before my head hit the keyboard.