uncledan

uncledan

51p

62 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

4 weeks ago @ Big Government - There Is Something You... · 0 replies · +3 points

I don't want to pile on you - I know it's frustrating. But could I persuade you to send a few bucks to his campaign anyway?

4 weeks ago @ Daily Camera.com: - Guest opinion: Skeptic... · 5 replies · +1 points

A good try by the article writer to deflect blame from the Climategate scammers but the reality is that the emails of other people have nothing to do with this. Stay on topic.
If you take their data (which they tried to hide and have since destroyed and admitted this numerous times in the emails) and send it to dissenting scientists in the field (which the climategate scammers tried to prevent from happening by illegally ignoring FOIA requests numerous times as shown in the emails) the data cannot be proven because:
1. it doesn't all exist any more, having been destroyed and admitted to by the climategate scammers 2. the remaining source code is such a mess that even the coder comments in the source code that he can't figure out what is going on 3. the climategate scammers admit in multiple emails they are having problems proving the theory they espouse - and are thus fudging the data 4. the climategate scammers in numerous emails are seen as setting up a peer review process where only positive peer reviews will be allowed while negative peer reviewers would be locked out of the process by hook or by crook 5. the emails show again and again discussion between the climategate scammers that the data they have is poorly collected 6. the final nail in the coffin which can be recognized by any first year college student - the little data that the climategate scammers cannot be rigorously tested to form a theory from their hypothesis. Once the data are held up to the light by many dissenting scientists, they don't prove anything. An example is the famous hockeystick graph (the underlying graph behind this whole movement). Simply put, you don't move forward with ideas (climate change/global warming) to change economies (the Copenhagen Summit) with unprovable data.
The problem is that the defense of the unprovable (and now we see fudged) data of climategate ranges from the 'you're not a scientist so you can't talk about it' to the 'we just don't understand the way scientists talk' to this one here 'everyone does it in their emails so let's just ignore it' to 'well we can't let a handful of bad scientists spoil the bunch' when it's that handful of scientists who are the source behind the huge carbon credit money movement scheme and all the 'green economies' being pushed by the IPCC at the UN.

4 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Cue the Vultures: Medi... · 0 replies · +2 points

If people want the constant attacks from the state run media to stop, then stop watching the state run media and stop buying their magazines and papers.

4 weeks ago @ Big Hollywood - Daily Gut: Oliver Ston... · 0 replies · +1 points

Maybe dum dum Stone can write a film about his buddy Chavez and how he's taking his country down the toilet.

4 weeks ago @ Macleans.ca - Palin In Nixonland · 5 replies · 0 points

You libs are besides yourselves with rage over anything Palin does. Everything is the fault of Palin, Bush, FoxNews, Reagan, Cheney, etc. The Left controls all three branches of American government - both houses, the White House and the Supreme Court. In addition, they have Hollywood and a slobbering state run media who will carry the water for anything they ask. Still, they can't stop blaming Palin. Did SHE give you double digit unemployment? 12 trillion in deficits, record bank failures, record business failures, a failing dollar, two of the big three automakers now run by the government (and still struggling), terrible foreign policy, three terrorist attacks on US soil in the last year, a stimulus bill that cost almost a trillion dollars and has done nothing, a healthcare bill on the horizon being pushed by Democrats who won't allow ANYONE to see it, etc. etc. ?
No, Palin did none of these things, and while Bush may have opened the door for some of them, it's President B+ and the Democrats who have walked us through.

4 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Going to Work for 'Sat... · 0 replies · +1 points

Want to piss a Liberal off right now? Click on foxnews.com. It gives them a hit, keeps their website ratings up and makes the left absolutely insane with fury. Lots of fun!

4 weeks ago @ Macleans.ca - Kiss caused airport scare · 0 replies · +1 points

THAT'S IT!!
THE TSA NEVER SHOULD HAVE LET KISS INTO THE AIRPORT!! ESPECIALLY AFTER THAT GODAWFUL 'KISS MEETS THE PHANTOM OF THE PARK'!
DO YOUR JOB TSA! CAN YOU IMAGINE IF PAUL STANLEY HAD BEEN ABLE TO SNEAK THAT MOVIE IN AND GET IT TO PLAY ON AN INTERNATIONAL FLIGHT? THE PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BLOWN THE PLANE UP THEMSELVES!

4 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - As Climategate Becomes... · 0 replies · +1 points

I love this site but I beg you to remember that someday the administrations and thinking will change to the point where another style of thought will have control. No matter what it is, investigate it! Do not give it a pass! Make it defend itself through proof! No more damned lies - from the Left or the Right!

4 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - As Climategate Becomes... · 1 reply · +1 points

Climate Audit is a great site - I also go to Watts Up With That, The Air Vent, and Bishop Hill. All instrumental in leading the fight against this worldwide lie. A lie that is nothing more than money transfers using carbon credits under the guise of global warming and climate change.
American Thinker just had a nice piece on climategate too.

4 weeks ago @ Big Journalism - Hope Springs Eternal f... · 2 replies · +2 points

I live in a little city with a silly Liberal newspaper that is notorious for screwing up facts, arrogant reporting and of course the obligatory 'keep an eye on Palin and report anything she does as stupid - at least once every week so we can keep some readers'. I won't even go to their online site anymore. Sad, because I would like to know what is going on locally but if it means giving this Lefty rag another hit on their website, forget it. I can live without local news. Besides, I have about 15 blogs I read regularly that report the really important stuff - and report it well.