Tony
47p73 comments posted · 0 followers · following 1
10 years ago @ RouterJockey - Using Discontiguous Wi... · 0 replies · +1 points
I've updated the post to fix my XOR / AND maths.
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - MDS Fibre Channel Swit... · 0 replies · +1 points
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - Using Discontiguous Wi... · 1 reply · +1 points
BUT, when you're setting up a discontiguous mask for 3 or more IP addresses, you need to forget XOR, and simply use your own logic. Is the bit significant or not... in the case of comparing 1, 0, 1.. the bit is NOT significant, thus it will be set to 1...
Maybe it would be best if I rewrote this article to better explain the logic.
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - SNMP can save your life · 0 replies · +1 points
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - NEC and ProgrammableFl... · 0 replies · +3 points
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - SNMP can save your life · 0 replies · +1 points
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - Using Discontiguous Wi... · 3 replies · +1 points
In this case, you're looking at a significant, or don't care bit. Thus, if you have 101, your bit has to bet set to 1, because you don't care about this value. It changes between the 3 IPs you're checking against.
Does that make sense?
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - Nexus 7000 vPC Features · 1 reply · +1 points
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - Best Practices and Sec... · 1 reply · +1 points
12 years ago @ RouterJockey - Nexus 7000 vPC Features · 0 replies · +1 points