<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/776161</link>
		<description>Comments by thomps1</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Statement from James O’Keefe</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54388655</link>
<description>How and why exactly does one use their phone wiring to dump calls when it&amp;#039;s infinitely easier just to hit ignore or leave the phone off the hook? Why do you accept as truth the idea that O&amp;#039;Keefe would take Landrieu&amp;#039;s excuse that her lines were jammed (colloquial term for &amp;quot;inundated with phone calls) to mean that her lines were broken or somehow tampered with? This excuse makes zero sense. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54388655</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Statement from James O’Keefe</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54388198</link>
<description>This is literally the most unbelievable excuse O&amp;#039;Keefe could have come up with: Landrieu says she hasn&amp;#039;t been responding to all of her phone calls because she&amp;#039;s been receiving too many so O&amp;#039;Keefe assumes that her lines must be broken and decides to investigate that... which includes a van full of listening devices? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54388198</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>