<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/297415</link>
		<description>Comments by Thorsten Claus</description>
<item>
<title>Colorado Startups : The amazing portable OS of the future</title>
<link>http://www.coloradostartups.com/2009/06/07/the-amazing-portable-os-of-the-future/#IDComment34995651</link>
<description>1/  in 1999 all of our developers had Win-based developer towers with exchangeable HDs (not hot-swappable, though). I could turn of the office PC, slide out the 5.25&amp;quot; HD, and put it into developer PCs at home or other office locations. two drawbacks: some software registered by using CPU serial numbers or mainboards or something (I&amp;#039;m not a techie), so some software had to re-register (like Photoshop does now when you change the hardware).    2/  T-Systems (like many others as well) has &amp;quot;managed desktop services&amp;quot; since 2003, which in fact is a virtual desktop environment similar to SUN&amp;#039;s Sunrays - you can use a low-power-box, an all-in-one LCD screen, or software running on your computer, all works with only few problems (HD video is one of them; a local flash, java, silverlight rendering engine on-chip solved that problem, too).    3/  OnLive, best known for its gravitation it currently creates for &amp;quot;Game Streaming&amp;quot;, is planning to release a business suite - if latency and frame rates are okay  for gaming, it should be OK for browsing or word processing. Of course difficult if you&amp;#039;re not always online ;)    4/  HTC concept phones do exactly what you describe - problem is business mechanics and balance of computational power: should you buy a cheap phone and a fast laptop or a fast multicore phone and a dumb screen, where only one core is active when it&amp;#039;s a phone, and 16 cores are active when it&amp;#039;s a PC....    5/  Several concepts exists for a &amp;quot;Facebook OS&amp;quot; mobile phone. Together with Facebook Apps, you have a limited ubiquitous functionality... of course none of that has the potential of an all-purpose PC, and I guess it will take a while until the &amp;quot;Photoshop Facebook Application&amp;quot; will come out, and netbook vendors won&amp;#039;t sit on the sidelines, either...    6/  License models and software activation lags behind the &amp;quot;OS in a cloud&amp;quot;. I didn&amp;#039;t find any good startup or incumbent software maker yet that actually (not per marketing) addresses this problem.    7/  I know two under-the-radar startups in the valley that create BIOS / Firmware that can boot over Ethernet or Wifi...     8/  I tried to map a web-based storage drive once and install Photoshop into that web drive. Besides the already mentioned license activation problem, on a win PC the installer throws files and stuff everywhere across the HD, personal profile folders, windows systems dir, common files, ... a self-contained installer would be necessary (hello Adobe Air). Second problem was that most online storage programs &amp;quot;optimize&amp;quot; the upstream updates by caching or doing something else that locks files... e.g. updating ZIP files or creating them on-the-fly was a problem in earlier Dropbox versions (no idea if that&amp;#039;s still the case). </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.coloradostartups.com/2009/06/07/the-amazing-portable-os-of-the-future/#IDComment34995651</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>