thetab

thetab

68p

146 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

13 years ago @ Oxford Tab - Christine's Compelling... · 0 replies · +2 points

We are having a few technical issues with comments where they disappear. We should have it fixed this week. Apologies for this, but I assure you we would never delete those comments.

13 years ago @ Oxford Tab - Christine's Compelling... · 0 replies · 0 points

We are having a few technical issues with comments where they disappear. We should have it fixed this week. Apologies for this, but I assure you we would never delete those comments.

13 years ago @ Newcastle Tab - Jesmond students in dr... · 0 replies · -2 points

Pretty much yes, following the law is fairly paramount to a functioning society. Go and talk to your local MP about changing the law. If you want to act illegally then that is your choice. You may be thinking for yourself but suggesting that the law is redundant in considering which drug to take is moronic.

13 years ago @ Newcastle Tab - Jesmond students in dr... · 3 replies · -1 points

The difference is that "ciggerettes" and alcohol are legal and illegal drugs are, well, not.

13 years ago @ Exeter Tab - Graphic: Grad jobs in ... · 0 replies · 0 points

Take it up with High Fliers Research, not us xoxo

13 years ago @ Durham Tab - Ear 'bitten off' in Ur... · 2 replies · +10 points

Palatinate's story 'plagiarises' two lines from the Durham Times, including the one you mention:

"His family is offering a £2,000 reward for information leading to a conviction."
"Durham police have reissued their appeal for information on the attack. A spokeswoman said no suspect had yet been identified."

Both are re-writes, and this is completely standard practice. If you have any problem, call me on 07552 944 996 and I will explain why you are making a fool of yourself. In the meantime, read a newspaper.

Please don't ever comment on this website again, you total moron.

Jack Rivlin

13 years ago @ Bristol Tab - University Challenged · 0 replies · +1 points

Kind of implied by mentioning that this was a second-round match, no?