en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/944875 Comments by thedoc1948 http://bigjournalism.com/chorner/2010/03/23/usa-today-global-warming-handmaiden/#IDComment64215438 anthropogenic global warming myths, cont'd. 3. More importantly, the Vostok ice core studies have shown there have been periods where the temperature changes have been inversely proportional to the CO2 levels. That diminishes the importance of CO2 as an important greenhouse gas. 4. The recent spike in CO2 was measured on the Mauna Loa volcano, an engine of CO2 and CH4. While it is important to protect our environment, we have, most definitely, been hoodwinked by the most ardent of the anthropogenic theorists. Yes, anthropogenic warming is definitely an economic issue as opposed to a scientific issue. Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:27:00 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/chorner/2010/03/23/usa-today-global-warming-handmaiden/#IDComment64215438 http://bigjournalism.com/chorner/2010/03/23/usa-today-global-warming-handmaiden/#IDComment64215331 At docsteiner.org I have briefly discussed some of the details associated with anthropogenic global warming and how good scientists have sold out to political interests. I have gone into the analysis of scientific data from esteemed institutions like NOAA, Woods Hole, University of Alabama-Huntsville, the Vostok studies, and NASA in a book titled, “Stealing America’s Future” to be released late in April. We have seen major problems in the “science” of anthropogenic global warming, beyond the IPCC scandal. The data is incomplete and flawed. 1. Our scientists have used statements like “the last 150 years have seen a huge increase in warming and CO2 levels and the last 10 years are the hottest in recorded history.” That is false as they are attempting to establish a climate model of geologic time not based on geologic time. What about the times on this earth that were substantially warmer like the Eocene Epoch? Did man cause that? 2. Sadly, they have not considered the fact that our magnestophere has declined by 10% in strength in the last 150 years. What does that mean? It means high energy particles and heat more easily penetrate our atmosphere in the high latitudes. Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:26:12 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/chorner/2010/03/23/usa-today-global-warming-handmaiden/#IDComment64215331