Now that the hysteria has quieted - I hope, look at the picture. Is it a bomb?

You are certainly free to question anything you want. But what do you propose re: 911? The situation is not the same w.r.t. having a scientific basis, general scientific knowledge, and published research. It's a who did what to who thing instead. I was able to view your original post here even though I was not able to push it through the automated filter. I think the technical questions you raised have been answered. Differing views on how the building should have collapsed are based on assumptions about the building's construction. Assumptions aren't facts.

Kevin - History has been quite consistent; warmer periods result in - i.e. "cause" - an increase in human activity. Strange beliefs often result from getting confused about causality related to some apparent correlation.

They bought him during the campaign - now they want what they paid for.

That's right. Maybe the fox should go investigate the chicken house.

So where is the acknowledgement that family law has left the realm of private issue law and become an intense political issue? Where is the acknowledgement that the destruction of marriage was created for corrupt money flow controlled by politicians - and that the Democratic Party led the way? Baldwin advocates accuse people of politicizing the issue when they raise this concern. Are they stupid, or just refusing to remove themselves from the left side of Hollywood far enough to tell the truth?

I have the book. It's not worth the money. It's misleading re: the problem in general, self serving, and the details are unique to the life of someone with lots more money than the average Joe.