IntenseDebate - reyz01a

12 years ago @ Big Government - Obama Forcing Private ... · 0 replies · +2 points

I feel for you. Such mandates are ruining small business in America.

Of course, if you try to do it on your own, and your local sheriff does not understand that his job (as an oath swearer to the Constitution) is to protect your property from usurpation by the Feds, then, you will most likely suffer the consequences.

That was why I suggested that anyone in any such situation must first educate their sheriff to what is going on.

Over 100 sheriffs and police chiefs had their first meeting last month in Las Vegas. Google the videos and see what they have to say. These sheriffs have gone head to head with the EPA and the EPA has backed down.

12 years ago @ Big Government - Obama Forcing Private ... · 2 replies · +23 points

In his mind, and the minds of his followers, he is a Ruler, not a Servant. His recess appointments made that abundantly clear.

I'm with Cowboy Logic on this one. People just need to go ahead and use their land and property as they see fit. Get the local sheriff to join the newly formed Constitutional Sheriff and Peace Officers Association. The EPA or any federal agency acting in contravention to the Constitution should be met by local law enforcement and threatened with arrest for illegal acts against the rights of the people.

12 years ago @ Big Government - Imagine a Moratorium o... · 0 replies · +12 points

The Constitution does not say "The right of the people to keep and bare arms, except for felons". The 1968 CGA is the result of an international treaty. Congress is not allowed to make laws in direct contravention to the US Constitution. The 1968 CGA is an illegal treaty.

12 years ago @ Big Government - Too Many Charter Schoo... · 0 replies · +5 points

Grass roots. Run for School Board. Run for Supervisor. Take back the education of our children from drooling, sociopathic sycophants.

12 years ago @ Big Government - Why Many Young People ... · 0 replies · +1 points

No...I am defending the Constitution and the limits placed upon the federal government under article 1, section 8.

It is not the government's job to nanny everyone into submission.

More conscious than you shall ever be, unless of course, you grow up and do some research, embrace your liberty and learn that you, and only you, are responsible for your life, just as those around us are also responsible for their own life.

So, yes, grow up.

12 years ago @ Big Government - Play-by-Play of the Ne... · 1 reply · +1 points

What fee? I was not charged a fee. First I heard of it. If you were being charged a fee, you should contact the Nevada Republican party.

12 years ago @ Big Government - Why Many Young People ... · 2 replies · +1 points

OK, so you like calling names when you have no data vivlibomuori. That's nice. Your life is subjective. Do some reading.

Besides which, the federal government does not have the power to regulate drugs.

grow up.

12 years ago @ Big Government - Why Many Young People ... · 0 replies · +1 points

The federal government does not have a "right" to do anything. Rights are reserved for People. The government has been granted certain enumerated powers by the States and the People. The 18th Amendment made alcohol illegal in 1921. The 22nd amendment made it legal again. There's a reason there had to be a Constitutional amendment to outlaw alcohol.

The current so-called "war on drugs" is due to a 1972 international treaty on controlled substances. Congress is only allowed to sign treaties with foreign nations that are in compliance with the Constitution. This treaty is illegal.

The commerce clause (you are using for your argument) was never meant as a means to actually control commerce among the several states. I was for "regulating" commerce, in other words, to make regular. Please read some of the ratification documents and the thoughts of those who actually crafted and ratified the Constitution.

You are sorely lacking in Constitutional knowledge. Please don't cast stones at those of us who actually have read the Federalist Papers, as well as the letters and related documentation formulated by the ratifiers.

Idiot.

12 years ago @ Big Government - Why Many Young People ... · 1 reply · +3 points

And who made you God, or those you support? What part of the Constitution givesyou, or anyone else, the authority to decide what people should ingest? What's the next step for people like you who think they have a say in how anyone else lives their life? What foods we eat? Oh wait...it is the non-constitutionalist government that is now saying that people do not have the right to drink raw milk. Jeez...such hubris. The problem with other people thinking they can tell me, or anyone else, how to live their life it that those who think they know best, are more screwed up than those they are trying to control.

If someone uses drugs and infringes on the life, liberty, or property of someone else...then, they are culpable, not for doing drugs, but for infringing on someone else's liberties.

You, billyb9, do not understand personal liberty or morality.

Be quiet. Shush...your elders are speaking. (jk. you have the right to an opinion. just try to keep the stupid ones between you and your porno sessions.)

12 years ago @ Big Government - Why Many Young People ... · 8 replies · +4 points

Fail. Ron Paul has simply stated that the Constitution does not authorize the federal government to criminalize drugs. It took the 18th amendment to criminalize alcohol and the 22nd to negate the 18th. So, where in the Amendments to the Constitution, does Congress have the power to criminalize drugs? Do some research. He has said it is a State issue. By the way, look up the drug statistics for Portugal. Drug use is down, despite legalization of almost all drugs. Pin head.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with reyz01a

People I'm following

reyz01a