congratulations! you are only 40 yrs behind the times. i suppose there were people like you in the 60s that pined for the roaring 20s.

8 yrs of unpopular war and you think this is fertile ground for a pro war movie? easy money, huh.

well, why don't you and your john wayne wanna be mouth breathers pony up the dough for an independent film? hmmmm?

your a writer for fux sake. you and the rest of the hacks here can whip up something and get britefart to produce it and he could drudge to link to it.

looks like the leftist red cross are in on it too: http://www.nybooks.com/icrc-report.pdf

jo jo, you should prolly just stop watching teevee shows about actor's on your favorite teevee shows if information is this upsetting. i want you to take a deep breath and promise to try harder to block out any contrary view that may bruise your delicate feelings.

ignorance is bliss i'm told.

jihad!!!

zomg your opinion pieces are even worse w/o an accompanying video fail. rtard's all out war on science, education, and philosophy is exactly what is driving you into irrelevancy.

the only difference between your stance and that of any mideastern or asian religious fanatic are the postal codes. one man's ignorance is another's salvation.

being moral for fear of an invisible being that someone told you a story about when you were a kid makes you a better person than someone that has morals for moral's sake? so, if one were to be forced to serve in a soup kitchen at gun point, that person would be better than the person that is there by their own will? hmmm, see where logic aces you again?

btw, which religion are you talking about chowder? they are all fraught with a bigoted and bloody pasts to one degree or another. it seems your "piece" is short on details and supportive facts. much like 'highlander' there can only be one true religion. which sect do you follow? afraid of blowback if it's not the right one? is it some kind of kookie canadian religion?

to use the broad term "religion" to attack the philosophy of atheism opens the field to many beliefs and dogmas you would discount, as well. as a proud discordian, hail eris!, i must admit that my "religion" is built on a foundation just as sturdy and logical as any other "religion".

well, pseudonymous woman, your slanderous use of child rape to label those with whom you don't agree is still the epitome of cowardice and trivializes a horrible trauma that many children are subjected to.

Also, by your logic i can easily fabricate an assumption by the way you 'come off', that you're a syphilis ridden, desperately lonely cat lady living in a trailer outside of lubbock . this would be still without basis and doesn't pertain to the conversation, but when in rome. no difference. logical fact.

thank you for your hackneyed input. that would have been quite clever 5 or 10 years ago. you should cut and paste instead of trying to retype your funny funny all by yourself. otherwise, you will set a bad example for the "childern" of the "forst". lol

i simply posit arguments to break up the monotony of the squawking parrots on these boards. but, alas, it's always parrots that attempt to reply.

well played my brave anonymous friend!

let that be a lesson to you kids! throw around the term "pedophile" if you want to say something but can't think of anything clever. child r4pe is a useful instrument in any lost argument. and don't worry kids, using "pedophile" for such purposes doesn't dilute the meaning nor does it trivialize the word.

the more you know...

golly, jayne! i hope the intern that deletes that very articulate missive, doesn't take it too hard.

of look! (sic) what me and chowder had is in the past. i've moved on. now i ❤ 'gentle ben'.

i can't decide what is funnier, conservative comedy critiques or britefart getting pwnd like a pony.

then again there is the hilarity of the posts defending the highly unethical if not criminal 'cramer' after seeing him brag about screwing the people that invest their life savings in 'the market'. that takes some seriously twisted logic, since scumbags like 'cramer' have probably had their hands in all of our pockets at one time or another.

this is the funniest site on the net, tragically funny, but still f u n n y :)