<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/639214</link>
		<description>Comments by pragmatist123</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Millions face shrinking Social Security payments</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A8V4080#IDComment31788946</link>
<description>While I sympathize with your disability why is it the taxpayer&amp;#039;s responsibility to support you?  Why are the rich greedy because they want to hold on to the money they earned.  What gives you the right to require somebody else to pay for your support?  Why don&amp;#039;t you start an insurance company not to generate a profit but to take on clients with pre-existing conditions so you can go broke.  Obviously there is a reason that you are broke and it has nothing to do with your disability.  My guess is that if you held on to 15% of your income and invested it properly you would have a lot more than what social security offers you in addition to self respect. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A8V4080#IDComment31788946</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>