patadave
32p37 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Random Sitcom Idea · 0 replies · +1 points
Hmmmm, maybe all the actors should be named Dave... And, it would be written by Dave Eggers!
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Life by Francis Bacon · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Net Neutrality · 0 replies · +1 points
Similarly, applying free market ideas to telecoms (which get special breaks from the government and are in some ways stewards of limited public resources) distorts the purpose and value of free markets.
That said, it does seem like this is a situation where freedom for one side leads to unfair constraints on the other. I'm not sure what the solution might be. Perhaps if common carrier laws were applied to the infrastructure, but the ISPs were allowed to do what they want? So, Verizon could throttle your bandwidth all they wanted, but you could use your local independent ISP who promised net neutrality.
But whatever happened to all the independent ISPs? Way back in the Internet stone age I used to get my service from a small start-up that I visited monthly to pay my bill in cash. Do Verizon, AT&T, Brighthouse, and the other giant ISPs even have small, local, independent competitors anymore?
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Random Sitcom Idea · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Does progress imply a ... · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Does progress imply a ... · 0 replies · +1 points
I'm trying to parse out the conservative argument against Obama and progressivism, etc. This conflation of progressivism and socialism goes back at least to Hayek. It seems like most popular conservatives "know" this but don't articulate it well.
Plus, some conservatives (like Disraeli and Russell Kirk) accept that there can be a balance between progress and tradition.
However, I'm still not sure if progress must be teleological. Popper argues that progress doesn't have to be a part of an overarching plan, and I think that's right, but reducing the idea of progress to its most discrete, situational elements strikes me as a little weird.
So, I'm trying to wrap my head around the idea of an abderitic progress.
(Abderitic is Kant's term for a historical trajectory that is neither the lot of humanity improving, nor the lot of humanity getting worse, but is rather a chaotic combination of things getting better and worse. Kant argued that this was the most ridiculous way to portray history, and that historians have a moral responsibility to demonstrate that things are getting better; i.e. progressing.)
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Debunking Health Care ... · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Ze Frank at Time Magazine · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Sustainable Past, Sust... · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Re/Creating Tampa - Is it a cold or a flu? · 0 replies · +1 points
Um, no, wait. A productive cough is when you are able to produce some phlegm and clear out your lungs a little, and an unproductive cough is when none of that phlegm moves. A productive cough can actually be a bad thing if the secretion you're producing is blood (for example). But, for the garden variety cold, I can testify that unproductive coughs are maddening.