Are you threatening me? Where did you get this "straw man" theory and can you please specify as to what you are even trying to say....?

The court, ran by Judge Adler, has indefinitely ordered the victim to turn over excruciating evidence to the defenses case. Where in this did you get the idea that its not going to happen? The woman will go to jail and be in contempt of court is she refuses to hand over evidence supporting her theory. There are exceptions to the rule.... maybe you are mad because because nothing you ever did was good enough to be the exception.. like your grammar and english for example.. or even the way you hold yourself and beg for equality and justice from the rich, yet stomp you foot ad done and throw tantrums to prove your point. If we were debating in front of the police right now and you were speaking to me the way you are portraying yourself by yelling and calling names... the would probably see it as a threat and you would be arrested and possibly thrown in to a psych ward for evaluation because a lot of people with irrational thinking and yelling and outbursts have a mental psychological handicap.

At least i have a enough humility to say that my comment out of passion was wrong by 200 years and corrected my mistake...

But to you.. that comment alone is a "straw man." Pointing out something that is complete irrelevant to the basis and structure of my personal point.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Please leave me alone.

Oh, and you need to read the reference.... You are really embarrassing yourself.

It's not a "search warrant" like someone else stated... Where in ANy article does it say "search warrant?"

It's a simple request for information regarding and pertaining to the defenses truth.

When they seized the defendant.. they took his computer and hard drive and google search.... Why can't it be a fair trial?

Oh, but the point.. it's NOT A SEARCH WARRANT.... It's a request for information regarding the case.

i should get paid for my time spent on reading your stupidity and irrational commenting.

You know what... you're just a terrible person and i choose to stop bickering with someone who is so bitter.. it's like beating a dead horse...

Good luck with whatever it is you are dong.. and don't forget to leave an obscene and irrelevant comment after my last two .. just for the sake of getting the last word in and obstructing what should be just.

I choose to go to the park, safely without my stalker... because I willingly tuned over excruciating evidentiary email that proved my innocence and his guilt ....to keep him far far away..

Yeah, i want to go outside safely.. instead of argue with an angry angry man.

Take care!

The court has ordered. accept defeat.

You're right! I'll give you that one.... It was 400 years ago... I must have lost track of time in the heat of passion...

But! It was just less than 200 years ago were we thought it was okay to exercise slavery.

And back to the case reference... Every court DID NOT outweigh the request.. The supreme court approved it. Look It up.

If you watch this live airing of the debate at the supreme court.. you'll observe that the woman's personal attorney actually giggles and laughs at the procedure .. like it's not a mans life at stake... my concern is hat she actually says the words towards the end of her time.. "it's expensive" which is highly unclasp in a formal court argument.. concerning me that they are more concerned with the settlement at hand than the mans life.

It's actually a good reference....

When you open, click on the "State vs. Thomas Harry Bray" and sit down and watch the whole thing if you wish to do so..
http://oregoncourts.mediasite.com/Mediasite/Catal...

Probable cause that she is lying:
1)Glitches in her statement that is published by the bend bulletin. She remembers/ she doesn't remember.
2) She "thinks" the wine glasses were switched.
3) She was tsupposidely harshly brutally "thrown" on to a bed where the man who supposedly "threw" her is physically handicap.
4) She's not turning over a court ordered seize of documents... that shouldn't be a problem to turn over if she is such an innocent victim of crime.

I personally issued a restraining order on a man that was continuously stalking me from my parents house and harassing me through phone texts and email... I WILLINGLY AND PROUDLY handed over to the court, prosecution, and to whomever it may concern to MAKE SURE that scary man was by law kept far far away from me.

If this woman is so innocent... why is she hiding evidence that can put him in prison so that the man can't hurt me either?

THAT is my probable cause and personal history.

Pleas, your honor.. exorcise your right to get that woman's document so that I can be safer on the street.

Ummm..... actually Mr. Rush... In defense of Mr. donkjen, if you click on his profile name... you'll see his website. He's a photographer. A quite decent one as well. Where did you get the idea that he is "rich, liberal elitist?"

To me, it seems like he's probably a normal well-rounded man.. obviously with some intelligence to be able to be objective to what your vulgar comments say and stand up for sanity.....

WOW Rush !!! You're really mad at the fact that you consider yourself to be a "peasant" and instead of trying to change that about yourself, you choose to yell and complain and call people names and stomp your foot because you think you deserve what others have worked really hard for in life.

I have an idea! Maybe you could go on an internet date with a female executive, doctor, lawyer.. sleep with her.. then accuse her of rape and sexual assault so you don't have to be a "peasant" any longer! It's your free ride to get back at those big bad mean rich, liberal elitists.

uhhh. if we still had the same laws as 200 years ago, we'd still be burning witches.

I am saying she is lying. Should i go file? because somebody's life is at stake here. or should i stick my head in the sand like REAL victims are known for doing.. the reason why THIS WOMAN's records should be retrieved because REAL victims of heinous crimes need to stand up.. Not hide any little detail and pull the victims rights bs... 4 months later!!!! When the rights were meant for REAL VICTIMS of crime.. not those after a free ride. If there is nothing to hide.. what the heck are you trying to protect? Anything that may be "embarrassing" or "irrelevant" or anything to that nature will not be admissible in the court. They by god will not llow that.. this woman is so protected under so many laws that were made for the true and innocent... true and innocent.. hand your google mail and information over.. for the sake of justice and truth! Make an example to other women that if this happens to them and they have to turn documents over in order to put a terrible perpetrator in prison so that he can not and will not EVER be able to hurt another innocent young woman.. then so be it! Turn it over then get your millions!

What the heck is there to hide??? She'd been asked since december! Pete's sake.

um.. they did. Brigid Turner is the main prosecutor in this case.. but until the head DA is proved guilty.. he's still an overseeing. So, why are his right as "innocent until proven guilty" exorcised and Dr. Bray's are not?

Nobody really wants to make the DA mad.. you know what I mean? The press may just be a little more lenient.