<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/348286</link>
		<description>Comments by nealjking</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Syrian gunmen break artist\&#039;s hands as \&#039;warning\&#039;</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9PBDEM80&show_article=1#IDComment186737514</link>
<description>This is very sad. Shows a very deep degree of meanness. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9PBDEM80&show_article=1#IDComment186737514</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : No \&#039;special relationship\&#039; between Britain and US: MPs</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.d7ee3248658ea97d198f69b55aace657.17b1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment64501151</link>
<description>Let&amp;#039;s be realistic: Nations don&amp;#039;t have permanent friends, they have permanent interests.  To pretend otherwise is childish.  Indeed, unquestioning &amp;quot;friendship&amp;quot; is not always the best for anyone: Had Tony Blair pushed back a bit harder, instead of &amp;quot;holding Bush&amp;#039;s jacket for him&amp;quot;, the US might not have entered into the disastrous Iraq war - when there were no WMD there. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.d7ee3248658ea97d198f69b55aace657.17b1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment64501151</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Toyota\&#039;s US sales drop 8.7 percent amid mass recalls</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-HET74&amp;show_article=1#IDComment59406105</link>
<description>This sounds like a great time to buy a Toyota: Prices will be down.   Remember when Intel chips had a floating-point arithmetic problem? Stock dropped by 50% - for a month or so. But PCs were locked into Intel architecture, so it went back up.   Toyota still has great quality and well-thought-out features for its cars. This is upsetting for them, but it&amp;#039;s just a bump in the road. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=TX-PAR-HET74&amp;show_article=1#IDComment59406105</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama: Iran supreme leader worried about election</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98RSCDG4#IDComment24532186</link>
<description>Hey guys,  The point of making a statement is to impact the listeners in IRAN, not in the US.  For the President of the US to take a strong position when the facts are not rock-solid means that it could very easily be spun around, the way Castro spun the US antagonism towards him into the claim that: &amp;quot;All Cuba&amp;#039;s problems come from the US, and I, Fidel Castro, am your sole protector against the US!&amp;quot;   It worked for Fidel. There&amp;#039;s no reason to help out the mullahs&amp;#039; regime in Iran in the same way.   Even if Obama beats his chest and says, &amp;quot;Up yours&amp;#039;, mullahs!&amp;quot;, what would that accomplish? What matters is what&amp;#039;s going on at ground-level in Tehran.  Chill, guys: There&amp;#039;s enough excitement for now. The time to act is when it HELPS, not just because you&amp;#039;re upset. Everybody is upset, all the time... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98RSCDG4#IDComment24532186</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Kan. man convicted of Craigslist rape found dead</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98NEFSO0#IDComment23789851</link>
<description>What you say would be valid except that being a prostitute is still a crime, so the girls have no recourse.   If they just decriminalized prostitution, it would be safer for everyone. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D98NEFSO0#IDComment23789851</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : China says rich nations must cut emissions by 40 pct</title>
<link>http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.34524d91ed9226d24f193be246b20ea8.191#IDComment22031577</link>
<description>It is very interesting that China is demanding a 40% reduction in CO2 emissions from the developed countries, but not putting down a number for itself.  It looks like the first move in negotiating a number for themselves at the international meeting in Copenhagen, and they don&amp;#039;t want to show their hand too early. I guess they will propose a reduction in the neighborhood of 40%, but slightly less: maybe 35%. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 06:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http:/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.34524d91ed9226d24f193be246b20ea8.191#IDComment22031577</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : \&#039;El no habla\&#039;: Obama jumbles Cinco de Mayo salute</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97VNDT80#IDComment20769585</link>
<description>Obama derangement syndrome in full force at this website, I observe.  GOPers sinking ever deeper into an ever smaller echo chamber, only increasing in irrelevancy to the American electorate. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 May 2009 12:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97VNDT80#IDComment20769585</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Specter says he\&#039;s switching from GOP to Dems</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97RKDNO1#IDComment20092309</link>
<description>Specter has switched before, in 1965.  According to Nate Silver, Toomey&amp;#039;s plan to run against Specter would have likely resulted in 1) Toomey beating Specter; and 2) the Democrat beating Toomey; due to the &amp;quot;blueing&amp;quot; of Pennsylvania.   Now, I think it is likely that Specter will beat Toomey without much trouble. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97RKDNO1#IDComment20092309</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18659110</link>
<description>Sounds like another paranoid episode on your part. Meds, jeepy, meds. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18659110</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658977</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t watch TV normally. Watching the excerpt of Beck was enough to upset my stomach. He just gave off this slimy oleaginous impression. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658977</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658935</link>
<description>You keep thinking that you can start a mission without initial orders. That doesn&amp;#039;t seem very military to me. Aren&amp;#039;t you thinking of tin soldiers? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658901</link>
<description>Yeah, I slipped up. I normally try to keep it within your range. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658901</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658884</link>
<description>If your depth is what I estimate, I wouldn&amp;#039;t worry much about drowning in it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658884</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658860</link>
<description>No, I&amp;#039;m just pointing out that: - At the beginning, there must be orders; - On Friday and Saturday, orders were issued - at the request of the commanding officer. This has been stated several times in articles. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658860</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658802</link>
<description>It was the CIA that brought most of these people in; and the CIA that also eventually decided it was a mistake. So if you &amp;quot;give them the benefit of the doubt&amp;quot;, you have to also trust them when they say they were wrong, as well. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658802</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658623</link>
<description>Clinton is not the man on the spot. Rumsfeld &amp;amp; Bush are the dynamic duo who fired a general for telling them honestly how many soldiers were really needed, when they really wanted the number to be much much smaller. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658623</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658550</link>
<description>And what exactly would this do to save Captain Phillips&amp;#039; life? And explain why this needs to be done so urgently? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658550</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658489</link>
<description>The mission started out with initial orders; the commanding officer on the spot requested further information on day 3. That seems sufficient to me. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658489</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658453</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re in error, as usual: I&amp;#039;m a US citizen LIVING in Germany. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658453</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US sea captain freed in swift firefight</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658410</link>
<description>Toyota is having sales problems because the world demand far cars has dropped precipitously; but their share of the market is quite strong. I recall even 3 or 4 years ago that the world capacity for car manufacture was 30% higher than the world demand for cars. However, GM&amp;#039;s share of the market has been trending downward quite steadily; likewise for Chrysler. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97H4B680#IDComment18658410</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>