mittal87
35p10 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
161 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - News: Figueroa DFA'd · 0 replies · +1 points
You can place Pelfrey on the DL, but then 10 days later Figueroa has to be DFA'd anyways. We can keep O'day this way, but Pelfrey loses 2 more starts, I don't think the mets management wanted that.
You can send down Parnell and bring him up 10 days later for Figueroa, however the fact that the roster moves were made the way they were made tells me that mets management prefers to have a lefty in that final bullpen slot. Oh yea, and Figueroa is still DFA'd 10 days later using this technique.
Besides, the player that was going to get cut once Redding is activated is O'Day. For all intents and purposes, we were probably going to lose him anyways. We can also keep Figeroa up as the last man in the bullpen, but once again the fact that we did not tells me the mets prefer to have a lefty in that final slot.
162 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - Post-Game: Mets 5 Brew... · 0 replies · +4 points
162 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - Read: Five Facts, Five... · 0 replies · +1 points
162 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - Post-Game: Padres 6 Me... · 1 reply · +1 points
162 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - Post-Game: Padres 6 Me... · 4 replies · +1 points
Overreacting early in the year is really foolish. A good example is castillo a few days ago. Batting .100 and everyone ready to release him, 2 days later hes batting .380 and has all-star stats. Lets be patient fellas
163 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - Pre-Game: Mets @ Marli... · 1 reply · +5 points
We all gotta be patient, just because he has a 1 for 10 stretch does not mean he is done. Even the best hitters will have slumps, lets just not boo him (And potentially cause him to start pressing and struggle further) whenever he has a bad stretch.
164 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - Quotes: Mets OF Gary S... · 0 replies · +3 points
1. We replace Marlon Anderson with Sheffield (Win for the mets). Sheffield is much much more productive than anderson. Even in his worst year last year I would take sheffield over anderson 100 times out of 100.
2. If Sheffield causes problems, we release him and call up Nick Evans or Kielty, so now instead of having marlon anderson on the roster just because we owe him 1.1 mill, we have a better player in Evans or Kielty (Win for the mets)
The only concern is if Minaya is gunshy on releasing him if he causes a problem, but you cannot blame that on signing sheffield in the first place. Signing him is a great move, not releasing him if he causes problems would be a bad move (This does not make signing him a bad move).
164 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - SI: Sheffield agrees t... · 2 replies · +4 points
164 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - NYP: Mets Close to Sig... · 0 replies · 0 points
As long as he is willing to platoon and expect a role where he will get close to 300 AB's, this is a great roster upgrade move.
164 weeks ago @ MetsBlog.com - Buzz: Mets Discussing ... · 2 replies · +1 points
Also Sheffields BABIP was in the .230 range last year, which is absolutely unsustainable. This means he is in for a bounceback in AVG to around the .250-.260 range. Combine his right handedness and a way better OBP and more power compared to anderson, and I think this is a great move in terms of roster-improvement. Sheffield is an obvious upgrade over marlon anderson.
If sheffield will accept a role where he will get about 300 AB's on the season, this should be done.
Production