<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/751568</link>
		<description>Comments by maxentropy</description>
<item>
<title>Defense Tech : Brits Use Mine Blasting Charge in Afghan Offensive</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/02/17/brits-use-mine-blasting-charge-in-afghan-offensive/#IDComment57480711</link>
<description>Where&amp;#039;s the video?!  :) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/02/17/brits-use-mine-blasting-charge-in-afghan-offensive/#IDComment57480711</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Bushmaster Adaptive Combat Rifle</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/bushmaster-adaptive-combat-rifle/#IDComment53812413</link>
<description>Haha, great thoughts.  Think about this- we&amp;#039;re still bitching and whining about the M16/M4s and trying to upgrade/fix them and how long have they been around?  It&amp;#039;s a continuous process, but like you say-- you can&amp;#039;t please everyone. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/bushmaster-adaptive-combat-rifle/#IDComment53812413</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Bushmaster Adaptive Combat Rifle</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/bushmaster-adaptive-combat-rifle/#IDComment53811118</link>
<description>Pete, I agree with what you are saying here.    &amp;quot;its not the age aof a weapon, its the effectiveness that matters&amp;quot;  Very true.  However, Americans (like myself) continue to want to embrace new technology and designs as time moves on.  Perhaps it&amp;#039;s just not time to embrace a new rifle design yet.  Regardless, we Americans pride ourselves with our leading edge defense tech.  Don&amp;#039;t mind folks who get a little carried away...  :) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/bushmaster-adaptive-combat-rifle/#IDComment53811118</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : LockMart Exoskeleton Update</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/lockmart-exoskeleton-update/#IDComment53807866</link>
<description>Suppossedly, battery will last 72 hours + </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/lockmart-exoskeleton-update/#IDComment53807866</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : LockMart Exoskeleton Update</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/lockmart-exoskeleton-update/#IDComment53804399</link>
<description>I hope so </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/lockmart-exoskeleton-update/#IDComment53804399</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : LockMart Exoskeleton Update</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/lockmart-exoskeleton-update/#IDComment53454545</link>
<description>This is a prototype for a full mech-warrior type suit...  &lt;a href=&quot;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3586/3593985895_e3920c337f.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3586/3593985895_e3...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/lockmart-exoskeleton-update/#IDComment53454545</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : LockMart Exoskeleton Update</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/lockmart-exoskeleton-update/#IDComment53448133</link>
<description>definitely not. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/lockmart-exoskeleton-update/#IDComment53448133</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Bushmaster Adaptive Combat Rifle</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/bushmaster-adaptive-combat-rifle/#IDComment53416227</link>
<description>The interesting question is with ammo - the US moved from 7.62 to 5.56 to reduce the weight load on soldiers but now they keep discussing the lethality of 5.56 and the possibility to move up in caliber.  Sure, most these new ACRs &amp;amp; others have switchable loadouts for different calibers, but you&amp;#039;d want most your forces using the same caliber ammunition so coming to a decision before hand would be nice. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/bushmaster-adaptive-combat-rifle/#IDComment53416227</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : Bushmaster Adaptive Combat Rifle</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/bushmaster-adaptive-combat-rifle/#IDComment53415173</link>
<description>I love the SCAR.  Regardless of what the US chooses, gas piston is amazing! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/22/bushmaster-adaptive-combat-rifle/#IDComment53415173</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : The UAV Data Firehose</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/12/the-uav-data-firehose/#IDComment51880378</link>
<description>You sum it up perfectly.  Although, I would love to see more effort to map any possible patterns of enemy troop movement, etc. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/12/the-uav-data-firehose/#IDComment51880378</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : iPod Qadrahelodrone</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/06/ipod-qadrahelodrone/#IDComment50899434</link>
<description>Then we create counters to them.  Then militant groups start using the counters we developed against our own drones.  This is a huge issue considering the government really wants to move toward open source/off the shelf solutions now a-days. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/06/ipod-qadrahelodrone/#IDComment50899434</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Defense Tech : iPod Qadrahelodrone</title>
<link>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/06/ipod-qadrahelodrone/#IDComment50899241</link>
<description>An open window would do. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jan 2010 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://defensetech.org/2010/01/06/ipod-qadrahelodrone/#IDComment50899241</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>