<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/881029</link>
		<description>Comments by maryslayter</description>
<item>
<title>SmartBlog On Leadership : Live from #BlogHer: PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi on the leadership principles that guide her</title>
<link>http://smartblogs.com/leadership/2011/08/08/live-from-blogher-pepsico-ceo-indra-nooyi-on-the-leadership-principles-that-guide-her/#IDComment181685979</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry you didn&amp;#039;t find the post beneficial. We find that our readers really like it when we recap the high points of well-known speakers at conference -- not everyone has the resources to travel, and we try to give people a bit of the flavor of big-name events. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Aug 2011 22:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://smartblogs.com/leadership/2011/08/08/live-from-blogher-pepsico-ceo-indra-nooyi-on-the-leadership-principles-that-guide-her/#IDComment181685979</guid>
</item><item>
<title>SmartBlog on Workforce : Jackson Nickerson, on what the elections can teach us about corporate communications</title>
<link>http://smartblogs.com/workforce/2010/11/03/jackson/#IDComment107587156</link>
<description>Whether you agree with Obama&amp;#039;s policies or not, I think Nickerson&amp;#039;s observation about the actual change in communication strategy is worthy of any business leader&amp;#039;s attention. Technology (social media, web video, etc.) can be very effective in promoting change, but you have to stick with it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Nov 2010 13:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://smartblogs.com/workforce/2010/11/03/jackson/#IDComment107587156</guid>
</item><item>
<title>SmartBlog on Workforce : INSEAD Women’s Leadership Conference: &quot;Women and the Transition to Senior Management&quot;</title>
<link>http://smartblogs.com/workforce/2010/10/12/4-tips-for-high-potential-professional-women/#IDComment104255170</link>
<description>Fred, I don&amp;#039;t think the speaker intended sexism -- it&amp;#039;s just that she was speaking specifically to an audience of women at the conference. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 02:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://smartblogs.com/workforce/2010/10/12/4-tips-for-high-potential-professional-women/#IDComment104255170</guid>
</item><item>
<title>SmartBlog on Workforce : Pamela Meyer on the science behind “Liespotting”</title>
<link>http://smartblogs.com/workforce/2010/09/14/pamela-meyer-on-the-science-behind-liespotting/#IDComment99833051</link>
<description>Your issue here may be more with my edits than Pam&amp;#039;s advice. In her full response to my question, she had specifically mentioned the chronological order issue in the context of dealing with teenagers, and I had edited that out.  I cut that clause precisely because I didn&amp;#039;t think it was such a stretch to apply that advice in a business setting, including interviews. If someone&amp;#039;s response to a touchy spot in their history sounded a little too perfect and rehearsed, for example, that might warrant a followup question that tried to get past the story (true or not) that they had memorized. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://smartblogs.com/workforce/2010/09/14/pamela-meyer-on-the-science-behind-liespotting/#IDComment99833051</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>