One has to feel sorry for the guy. He is so scared of dying himself, and so impressed with his own intellect, that he is afraid to look at things rationally. He prefers just to resort to grade-school name-calling. The brain doesn't even resemble a computer, it resembles a computer interface/data storage device. We have no idea where "thinking" comes from - or where "ideas" come from - but it is doubtful that the brain has anything to do with it. How many times have you ever come up with an idea by reiterating data? No, you "stew on it", or you "sleep on it", or you "have an epiphany" - all evidence that the brain is not involved.

Thought - real thought - comes from the spirit. The brain interfaces the world to the spirit. That is why when it breaks down, sufferers of diseases like Alzheimer's or just plain old age dementia all report the same thing - I think like I always did, but the data going in gets confused, and the data coming out gets confused, so I cannot interface with the world. The "I know you - who are you?" thing.

But Hawking refuses to see the evidence of "spirit". Intelligentsia refuses to acknowledge "spirit". Can't see it, can't measure it, must not exist. But the problem is backwards. "Spirit" is substantial, matter is not. [One only needs to look at the ratio of space to matter inside an atom to realize that - an atom is like a bowling ball in your hand (the nucleus) with grains of sand whizzing around it (the electrons) - twelve miles away.] Trying to measure spirit with matter is like trying to measure a mile of distance with a ruler made out of smoke.

Way to go, Sarah! I have to confess, I don't know who Kathy Griffin is. Must be a has-been, or a never-been, or some other worn out shoe.

It's still cutting-edge research and there's no smoking gun, but there's evidence that whoever wrote this article is on crack, and has a cranial-rectal inversion. There is no evidence that anyone with any intelligence at all believes any of the hooey out there on global warming, including the billionaire hypocrites that push it very hard so that they can make billions more on phony carbon credits, or political traitors that desire to destroy Western civilization and replace it with Progressive Slavery.

Send me an e-mail, and I will send you sufficient information that you will change your mind. The rational position on this right now is "I don't know, and there is no evidence to prove the point either way".

Not only that, but when you have that belief system, lying to protect yourself if perfectly acceptable. If there is no God, or if God will save everyone, then there is no consequence to deceit, and whatever you can get away with is fine.

Obama has one BIG problem.

There is a God, and He judges righteously. And He really doesn't care much what Obama's personal beliefs are, He judges all men by the same standard. His.

It won't happen. Obama has spent over a million dollars of his own money and thrown a lot of weight about to prevent it. Not the actions of an honest person that has nothing to hide, but the actions of a corrupt politician that fears loss of power if the truth becomes known.

And I do not know what he is hiding, either.

No, it is up to the party that nominates him. There is nothing in the laws of the nation or the states that specifies who vets the Presidential candidate, and Judge Barclay Surrick, Federal Judge of the East District of Pennsylvania, ruled that American citizens DO NOT HAVE LEGAL STANDING to challenge any candidates eligibility, because, he said, they are not directly effected by the election of a person Constitutionally ineligible for the office. As a result, the evidence that shows that he is not eligible, such as it is, was not allowed to be admitted to Federal Court. The Supreme Court has thus far upheld that ruling, by refusing to hear any case regarding this, and there have been many.

How does it feel to know that you do not have legal standing to uphold the Constitution, just because you are a citizen? That makes your citizenship, what absolutely worthless? And it is, now. If you are an illegal, you get entitlements. If you are a citizen, you may as well put on shackles if they manage to gut the Second Amendment. Right now, your bullets are the only thing standing between you and a dictatorship of the Oligarchy. God grant that we never have to use them.

If you look at the nomination documents that Pelosi signed to get him on the ballot in the States, you will find that there are two versions, both notarized, but they are different. (I have copies). The first one says that he is vetted (determined to be eligible to be President), the second one omits that verbiage. The democratic party sent the second one to the States.

Apparently, Nancy has qualms about lying under oath. That, at least, is good. I think that she was covering her rather naked behind, because if it turns out he is not vetted, she can claim that she never said he was. That would at least spare her from perjury charges.

By the way, the FBI does not vet the President. The party that nominates him is supposed to. And, apparently the people. That was the line from the Democrats when this first came out - the people voted him in, therefore he is vetted. (The Constitution is just an inconvenient scrap of parchment that has no relevance to today's society or government - just ask the liberal Supreme Court judges. And America is no longer the land of the free.)

I don't think Cantor is being bought off, but I do believe that there has been an immense and very expensive effort by Mr. Obama to conceal his legal records, such as his birth certificate, his school records, and his passports. I became aware of this issue early on, and have a lot of documentation that raises doubts about the man. The most convincing thing is how hard Mr. Obama has tried to conceal himself. That alone has me convinced he is hiding something.

What, I don't know for certain. It might be that he was born in Kenya, the documentation doesn't support what his grandmother said when she claimed she was in the Mombassa hospital room with his mother when he was born. It might be that he renounced his American citizenship to obtain an Indonesian passport when dual citizenship there was illegal. The documentation is silent about how he got a passport to visit Pakistan when American citizens were forbidden to go there. It might be that he claimed British or Indonesian citizenship to obtain student aid money. The documentation is silent about whether or not he received foreign student aid to go to college. The silence is deafening.

What is not debatable is that this person who claimed that he was going to have the most transparent administration in American history has the most secretive and opaque administration in American history. He doesn't deem it necessary to show his employers his papers, even though that is a requirement of every other legal job in America.

For that reason, I will not accept him as my President. I consider him a fraud and an impostor, until he proves otherwise. His supporters will support him no matter what (they have proven that) but as an independent, I simply do not accept him.

And in America, I don't have to.

Here, Christine, I have a new story for you. Get a left wing radical on your show, and say, "The Italian Prime Minister is charged with messing with little girls. So, in light of that, what do you think of George Bush's belief that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?"

Moron.