Mark Dyck
4p3 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
16 years ago @ Spark | CBC Radio - Video: Tour of the Dig... · 0 replies · +1 points
It's certainly the way to go though, and I'd use it a ton if the selection was better.
I'm looking forward to your interview on Spark to see whether the major publishers are helping or blocking libraries as they try to get into digital works. Based on the selection at our library, I have to assume 'blocking'.
17 years ago @ The Footie Fool - That Owen Hargreaves s... · 0 replies · +1 points
17 years ago @ Spark | CBC Radio - How much information o... · 0 replies · +1 points
Sure it's self induced, but it sure is better than rabbit ears and single newspaper. I'm interested in a lot of stuff and it's great to connect with people who are the same way. Even 5 years ago it wasn't possible.
It's easy to stay on top of everything once you realize you don't need to stay on top of everything. Twitter is for those short escapes during the day -- if I miss 1,000 tweets it's not the end of the world. My RSS reader has a nifty 'Mark all as read' button -- Seth and Hugh won't mind if I miss one or two posts, will they?
My only firm rule is with email. Empty that gmail box every single night. Gotta get it to zero. Try not to think about the 100 starred messages that need my attention -- if they're important, they'll show back up in my inbox eventually.
If I had to cut it all out, I could do it. But it would hurt. It would hurt like if your parents moved you across country when you were 13 and you had to start making new friends again. But you couldn't because your parents didn't move to a city -- they moved to The Bush. So you'd talk to animals and give the trees names and carry around a small flat rock and call it an iPhone. And you'd finally have time to write that perfect book of poems but it would be all mixed up -- poems about squirrels on Facebook and the fish using Twitter (but they'd call it Bubbls.) Yeah, something like that. It would hurt a lot...