No, I am angry with the mis-use of alcohol.

And that last link is from the Cato Institute! (I guess that would be the libertarian element).

like!

Well I spoke with Fran, from the finance dept at CU and she consulted with Bronson, then called me back to call him, so I did. I have her phone number if you want validation.

Correct. She has been charged and justly so. I made my case. ETOH is intent to do harm, well anything! She may get off. Then so many other S/L therapists and other aspiring professionals will be relieved of their burden to restrain themselves and become more productive members of the culture, which needs aware individuals right now, for the survival of many of those less fortunate than the ones so self-aborbed and rich to be able to spend their money on such toxins, rather than just water, food or shelter.

Ethics?

Coleen Cribari, defense in the article.

So I am told by Bronson Hilliard that this funding came from a presently $250,000 balance that is available for safety and security events such as Obama visit, flood mitigation, police radios. RAVE text messages and non-affiliates coming to campus. This includes sporting events, CWF, etc. Then he hung up.

I am glad they charged her. It will make a statement that drunkeness itself IS AN INTENT to do harm, which is, quite simply an inconvenient truth. Alcohol is a harm inducing habit, no matter your genetic susceptibility to the drug.

So what is your take on that "intent" Coleen?

DRINKING excessively IS intent to enter spaces that are against the law. Because you PUT yourself in a position to do things you don't even know you are doing. Pretty obvious. Pretty condemnable behavior, drinking in excess.

Remember the kid that fell off the balcony in some brawl where no witness's could even be credible as to the cause because they were all drunk. He died. How stupid is that?

CU or a prison was to be located in Boulder. How close are they? CU smart, prison dumb. How close did they end out to be?

Too bad, she could have been a good speech/ language therapist were it not for a felony record. SOMEBODY has to pay the price for out of control behavior. Maybe the others will snap out of it with a good prosecution. CONSEQUENCES.

I am glad they charged her. It will make a statement that drunkeness itself IS AN INTENT to do harm, which is, quite simply an inconvenient truth. Alcohol is a harm inducing habit, no matter your genetic susceptibility to the drug.

So what do you think of that take on "intent" Colleen?

Donations coming of course from the uber-rich supporting the alcohol industry which is threatened by the competition of marajuana, which has much less impact.

The donations will never come close to covering the University's costs. The discussion from Phil on insurance just amplifies the argument against the spending of the $125 K opposing 4/20. "Rebates" costs don't come out of thin air. They are of course passed on to society. It is disingenuous to dismiss them. In order to get a rebate, for example, there must have been a premium on the hazards/liability of the use of marajuana on CU's campus to start with. There must be a proportionally larger one on alcohol use, so maybe they could get a really big rebate on that, with a good side benefit to student productivity and reduction of harm to surrounding community.

I feel so much like master of stating the obvious.