Why should the tax payers put 20 million dollars in plus close 2nd ave on a 38 million dollar project.
ST LUKE S owns the land and then it is tax free what adeal for the tax payers
Did fema pay for damage in 2008 I thought fema only payed once
Why should the tax payers pay for a 8 million dollar parkade get very little property tax as ST lukes owns the land and payes no taxes this is a free ride for wealthy doctors
You hit the nail on the head JIM ERNST And FOUR OAKS Would make crooked politician look like a holy roller
I did not see anything on the lost ballot about buying out slumlords that did not have properties registered as rentals and where selling them on unregulated contracts and paying them 30 -40 percent over assessed value
landlords are always whining first they want the home owners to bail them out of thier run down properties in the 100 year flood that had flooded numerous times then they want the police department and neighbors to manage their properties the worst of then are the bottom feeder slumlord property managers if they want to rent to to thugs and gang bangers let them do some place else we don't miss Miell and we wont miss another slumlord or low life property manager
this project is about taking tax paying properties off the tax roles and giving millionaire doctors a new building with no taxes plus blocking off 2nd ave and the tax payers giving them a 8 million dollar parkade and maintaining it THIS PROJECT WILL COST THE TAX PAYERS MORE THAN THE DOCTORS THAT OWN IT
Grassley also made the statment "if you want good heath insurance get a goverment job" Its time to dump Chuck
This looks like a Meill operation collect the rent and screw the tenant TIM Conklin is the slum lord that runs prefferred property management .If CONKLIN had a water leak in his house I bet it would be fixed immediately not weeks later .Cost mean nothing to slumlords they extort As much they can out of every tenant
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Opus