<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>leewaters's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/295785</link>
		<description>Comments by leewaters</description>
<item>
<title>Lee Waters : Sometimes They Come Back</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=780#IDComment27392603</link>
<description>And you typed it out loud too!  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=780#IDComment27392603</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Angry Puppy : Ozymandias Was Gay? [Incontrovertible Proof Within]</title>
<link>http://www.theangrypuppy.com/?p=1466#IDComment26350887</link>
<description>Hello. I was going to mark this as spam, but you seemed so earnest. Hope you&amp;#039;re doing OK over there&amp;hellip; </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.theangrypuppy.com/?p=1466#IDComment26350887</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Angry Puppy : Top Ten Geek Bands</title>
<link>http://www.theangrypuppy.com/2008/01/15/top-ten-geek-bands/#IDComment26350848</link>
<description>Shame? Over bands? Perhaps you should up your fiber intake. It&amp;#039;s just a fun little list. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.theangrypuppy.com/2008/01/15/top-ten-geek-bands/#IDComment26350848</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Angry Puppy : Anger Management (or, I'm the Godd*mn Batman!)</title>
<link>http://www.theangrypuppy.com/?p=1761#IDComment26350817</link>
<description>Find it? I made it! ;) </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.theangrypuppy.com/?p=1761#IDComment26350817</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Angry Puppy : Our 15 Favorite Witches</title>
<link>http://www.theangrypuppy.com/?p=978#IDComment26350776</link>
<description>Hey, MBM.   Angry Puppy: yes. :)  Another Brick in Our Wall: Nope. Never saw it. The plug-in is called &amp;quot;WP Wall&amp;quot;, so it just seemed like an apt label. More Pink Floyd than Will or Grace. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.theangrypuppy.com/?p=978#IDComment26350776</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Senator: "Weâre allowing gays to exist" (Updated With Audio)</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/senator-we&rsquo;re-allowing-gays-to-exist/politics/2009/06/19/3658#IDComment24910040</link>
<description>&amp;quot;And we&amp;#039;re allowing heterosexuals to exist. We just dont have the upperhand as they do.&amp;quot;   Why did you add &amp;quot;on a serious note&amp;quot;. ;)  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/senator-we&rsquo;re-allowing-gays-to-exist/politics/2009/06/19/3658#IDComment24910040</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lee Waters : Not Enough to Dream Today</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=741#IDComment24803766</link>
<description>Hmmm, I&amp;#039;m thinking 2016 will be a good year. ;) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=741#IDComment24803766</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Maggie Gallagher Goes Crazy! Crazy! Crazy! Over Carrie Prejean Firing</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/maggie-gallagher-goes-crazy-crazy-crazy-over-carrie-prejean-firing/discrimination/2009/06/10/3311#IDComment23838631</link>
<description>Maggie Gallagher has really lost it, and, frankly, it&amp;#039;s a bit fun to watch her and NOM implode as the weeks go by. She&amp;#039;s still trying to cast homophobes as an unfairly demonized group as always, but her desperate pronouncements sound less credible than ever before.   It&amp;#039;s clear to anyone paying attention that Prejean&amp;#039;s firing has little to do with her (ridiculous) beliefs and everything to do with her unwillingness to uphold her obligations to the pageant. Let&amp;#039;s not forget the support that Prejean got right after her idiotic statements, especially from those who felt that Perez Hilton had gone too far in retaliation. Even the pageant organizers who disagreed with her were initially willing to work with her, but she was more interested in promoting her religious agenda than in performing her duties as Miss California.   And so it goes.  Lee  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/maggie-gallagher-goes-crazy-crazy-crazy-over-carrie-prejean-firing/discrimination/2009/06/10/3311#IDComment23838631</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : What Republican's New York State Senate Coup Means For Gay Marriage</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/what-republicans-new-york-state-senate-coup-means-for-gay-marriage/politics/2009/06/08/3232#IDComment23669624</link>
<description>The situation was confusing enough last week (see Nate Silver&amp;#039;s piece). NY politics need a guidebook or a &amp;quot;Complete Idiot&amp;#039;s Guide to&amp;hellip;&amp;quot;  Lee </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/what-republicans-new-york-state-senate-coup-means-for-gay-marriage/politics/2009/06/08/3232#IDComment23669624</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Maggie Gallagher Admits NOM Infiltrated New Hampshire</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/maggie-gallagher-admits-nom-infiltrated-new-hampshire/politics/2009/05/21/2899#IDComment22068397</link>
<description>NHampshire: I agree. No outside source should infiltrate local government and overwhelm the will of the people unless the will of the people is unConstitutional.    I&amp;#039;m willing to listen if you want to explain this, but let&amp;#039;s clear the air. Your comment has a few red herrings to keep us off the actual issue.     Specificially:    &amp;bull; Polls show that a majority of the people of New Hampshire support marriage equality. Some, including me, suspect that the will of the people has been thwarted. It&amp;#039;s not a Democrat/Republican thing, though, and that distracts us with irrelevant baggage from the last 20 years.    &amp;bull; I don&amp;#039;t see the affirmative action analogy, but this issue is thorny enough without bringing in other, even thornier issues into the discussion. Let&amp;#039;s talk about it on its own merits.    With that said, what dirty money are you talking about and who did you mean by &amp;quot;&lt;strong&gt;we&lt;/strong&gt; don&amp;#039;t even know who NOM is&amp;quot;?     Lee </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/maggie-gallagher-admits-nom-infiltrated-new-hampshire/politics/2009/05/21/2899#IDComment22068397</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lee Waters : Who Da Ho? IDAHO!</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=704#IDComment22003226</link>
<description>Thanks, jaysays!  This should be a weekly thing. I need more suggestions for my RSS reader. :D  (Oh, and sorry for the delay. IntenseDebate tried to eat your comment, and I didn&amp;#039;t check the spam folder! Bad Lee&amp;hellip;) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=704#IDComment22003226</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lee Waters : Who Da Ho? IDAHO!</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=704#IDComment22003075</link>
<description>Oh, thanks. :D &amp;quot;Celebrate!&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=704#IDComment22003075</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : Maggie Gallagher Admits NOM Infiltrated New Hampshire</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/maggie-gallagher-admits-nom-infiltrated-new-hampshire/politics/2009/05/21/2899#IDComment21997001</link>
<description>&amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;ve figured out how to go over the heads of the media directly to the people on the marriage issue &amp;mdash; even in New England. Some enterprising reporter may just ask how?&amp;rdquo;  This enterprising non-reporter may just ask how they went &amp;#039;directly to the people&amp;#039; in such a short period. She makes it sound legally and ethically sketchy. Or is she just trying to be cute?  Incidentally, I&amp;#039;d also like to ask who funded this new &amp;#039;method&amp;#039;, and I&amp;#039;d like to ask her to be a little less coy when talking about her machinations for stripping me of my civil rights. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/maggie-gallagher-admits-nom-infiltrated-new-hampshire/politics/2009/05/21/2899#IDComment21997001</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lee Waters : The Changing Face of Evil</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=678#IDComment21449699</link>
<description>Nah, not worth the trouble. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=678#IDComment21449699</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lee Waters : The Changing Face of Evil</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=678#IDComment21441309</link>
<description>Aw, dang. You&amp;#039;re right, but Wolverine was neither the inspiration nor the intention. It&amp;#039;s early days anyway, but that pretty much nixes this option. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=678#IDComment21441309</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lee Waters : Music for Matthew</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=606#IDComment21408815</link>
<description>Ah! I didn&amp;#039;t get an invitation because Spotify isn&amp;#039;t available in the US. ;) Where are you based?  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 23:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=606#IDComment21408815</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lee Waters : Music for Matthew</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=606#IDComment20912085</link>
<description>Thanks Ephram! :D I don&amp;#039;t have an invitation token, but I signed up to get one. I&amp;#039;ll check it out ASAP. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 May 2009 22:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=606#IDComment20912085</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : BREAKING NEWS: Gay Marriage Bill Passes Maine Senate</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking-news-gay-marriage-bill-passes-maine-senate/asides/2009/04/30/2226#IDComment20288938</link>
<description>The news! It&amp;#039;s too fast! :D I can&amp;#039;t keep up (following #FireFoxx today).      Have we got New Hampshire surrounded then? Come out with your bigotry up!  :D </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking-news-gay-marriage-bill-passes-maine-senate/asides/2009/04/30/2226#IDComment20288938</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The New Civil Rights Movement : BREAKING NEWS: Poll: Majority Of Americans Favor Gay Marriage</title>
<link>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking-news-poll-majority-of-americans-favor-gay-marriage/successes/2009/04/30/2216#IDComment20284810</link>
<description>Oh, that&amp;#039;s a plurality, but we&amp;#039;re &lt;strong&gt;so&lt;/strong&gt; close! w00t!     Take that, Maggie! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/breaking-news-poll-majority-of-americans-favor-gay-marriage/successes/2009/04/30/2216#IDComment20284810</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Lee Waters : Ceci n'est pas un cadeau.</title>
<link>http://leewaters.com/?p=595#IDComment20178258</link>
<description>You mean in general or just these files?  :D  Lee </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://leewaters.com/?p=595#IDComment20178258</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>