What comment? On this post this should be your third, and this is my third. I never got a notification if you had sent a fourth one.

I'm not ignoring all of the evidence, my friend. The fact is that you are. Check out this site, which lists comments he made that directly oppose other things he is supposed to have said: http://www.answers.org/history/hitquote.html . When Hitler's words and actions contradict the lifestyle of a Christian, I have reason to believe to doubt his Christianity.

Feel free to believe that republicans in Florida are gay atheists if you see them hanging out in gay bars and ranting against the church and the foolishness of theism, or profaning a cross.

I have no doubt that Hitler was an atheist, actually, in spite of what sort of statements he made. He was a politician, after all. What can be absolutely certain is that his actions- regardless of what he claimed- were completely in opposition to the teachings of Christ. Jesus made it clear that “My kingdom is not of this world”, and that people should treat each other with dignity. He never advocated violence, particularly against Jews, since He was one Himself. I can call myself a Mercedes and sit in the garage, but that doesn’t make me a car.

Of course I see very atheistic perspectives in all he did. There was a direct correlation between the writings of Darwin and the beliefs of Hitler. However, proving that Hitler was an atheist isn’t really within the scope of this post.

But that is precisely the line of thinking that someone such as Hitler had.

Darwin himself wrote: “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world…. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla." –The Descent of Man, 1871, ch. 6.

What about Peter Singer, who says there is no reason to avoid bestiality?

Evolution teaches that “we are animals so that “sex across the species barrier ceases to be an offence to our status and dignity as human beings. – Peter Singer, “Heavy Petting, 2001

Or these guys who say that rape is ok?

Rape is “a natural, biological phenomenon that is a product of the human evolutionary heritage, akin to “the leopard’s spots and the giraffe’s elongated neck. – Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer, “Why Men Rape,” 2000

I have to disagree with the world peace thing, too. Frankly, fewer people to compete with for resources sounds like a good thing. If there are fewer males, that means more females to go around. I hardly think this fits in with a decent morality.

Lol, I'm very serious, but I really have a hard time imagining that you are. Think about it: my whole point is that there are certain prejudices that are good to have, based on the fact that these ideas are either wholesome for a society or flat-out biblical. You announce that I have no common sense, that my view of "everything" is skewed (which is a little extreme, I must say, since nobody is skewed in every area), that I am corrupting youth, and that what I write is hate propaganda. Are you not demonstrating that you also have prejudice? If prejudice is indeed bad, you ought to live and let live. You ought to let me write as I feel I should write. Instead, you say in no uncertain terms that I am wrong- and without much discussion as to WHY I am wrong. Of course, then we must also settle where your ideas of good and bad came from, since those are also prejudices in the broadest sense. In short, you either have a baseless prejudice and pretend not to, or you are joking. I'm just going to assume that you are joking, since the alternative is absolutely laughable. Wow.

Praise the Lord for moving in each of our lives, giving us divine appointments with other believers! I'll be praying for you. God bless!

I'd read it start to finish, actually. Numbers may be a challenge, but if you take a few of the important concepts out of it, it will help you with the rest of the Old Testament. If you're not up for the challenge, I'd start in John and finish up the New Testament, then head back to Genesis and read the Old Testament through. You'll have good momentum going by that point to handle Numbers, and there are some interesting connections between OT and NT. Bible reading is one of the most rewarding things you can do. Happy reading!

Maioribus, I welcome thoughtful discussion from anybody, provided they're willing to be polite about it. Frankly, I'm a little low on time these days, but if you don't mind my replies being a little delayed, I would enjoy talking with you!

Lol, glad you enjoy it, young Padawan!

Lol, it's an illustration of her point, actually. Trying not to take her word-for-word!