<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/761439</link>
		<description>Comments by kennethlim</description>
<item>
<title>URBAN SIGNAL by KENNETH LIM : Inside The Super Bowl Ads</title>
<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/02/inside-the-super-bowl-ads/#IDComment59355133</link>
<description>Thanks, Steven! Sorry I&amp;#039;m so late, your comment was hidden within the Intense Debate system and was marked as spam :(  Hope you&amp;#039;re well :) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/02/inside-the-super-bowl-ads/#IDComment59355133</guid>
</item><item>
<title>URBAN SIGNAL by KENNETH LIM : TenPages.com Makes Book Publishing More Accessible But Buyer Beware</title>
<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/02/tenpages-com-makes-book-publishing-more-accessible-but-buyer-beware/#IDComment58684673</link>
<description>Thanks, Valentine, I truly appreciate the insight here! Having worked at a publisher in the past, I understand the challenges to make it all work. The current earnings model does (or should) stimulate investing shareholders to critically look at manuscripts to prevent making any loss ;)  Also, in spite of some of the harshness in my first take, I do think TenPages offers aspiring authors a great platform to get traction, encouragement and opportunity.  I plan on monitoring the TenPages platform and revisiting it on this blog in 6-12 months to see how the works are coming to fruition :) Best of luck and thanks again for the inside scoop! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/02/tenpages-com-makes-book-publishing-more-accessible-but-buyer-beware/#IDComment58684673</guid>
</item><item>
<title>URBAN SIGNAL by KENNETH LIM : TenPages.com Makes Book Publishing More Accessible But Buyer Beware</title>
<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/02/tenpages-com-makes-book-publishing-more-accessible-but-buyer-beware/#IDComment58555248</link>
<description>Thanks, Valentine, I appreciate it that you stopped by to clarify.  I&amp;#039;ll edit the article based on your feedback. It&amp;#039;s good to have transparency :)  I agree that the social aspect--whether egoistic as in getting your own name mentioned in the book, or altruistic as in helping someone else reach the next level--can act as a great incentive for shareholders.  Nonetheless, I think there are some variables that offer playing room. An example is using a % of the margin rather than a % of the retail price, because I assume that different distribution channels and publishing formats can have different prices and profit margins. Suppose you&amp;#039;re introducing a title as both a printed book and an ebook, priced at &amp;euro;10 and &amp;euro;6 respectively. As a shareholder and with the current revenue model, I would seriously discourage people to buy the ebook, heh ;) What are your thoughts on such situations?  Thanks again!  P.S. I actually am Dutch :) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/02/tenpages-com-makes-book-publishing-more-accessible-but-buyer-beware/#IDComment58555248</guid>
</item><item>
<title>URBAN SIGNAL by KENNETH LIM : Inside The Super Bowl Ads</title>
<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/02/inside-the-super-bowl-ads/#IDComment56925737</link>
<description>Thanks, Katie, I had also read Rob&amp;#039;s commentary, but the one thing that I was wondering about was whether a &amp;quot;per impression&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;average&amp;quot; score was calculated. For example, Doritos had 18K tweets and Google had 12K tweets. I don&amp;#039;t remember the exact numbers but if Doritos had 6 ads and Google only 2, then on average (or per impression), Google would score better in &amp;quot;efficiency&amp;quot;. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/02/inside-the-super-bowl-ads/#IDComment56925737</guid>
</item><item>
<title>URBAN SIGNAL by KENNETH LIM : RECAP: The Community Engagement Framework</title>
<link>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/01/recap-the-community-engagement-framework/#IDComment52471774</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s an experiment to see how it works. If I or a lot of other people don&amp;#039;t like it, I&amp;#039;ll replace it again :) </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.kennethlim.net/2010/01/recap-the-community-engagement-framework/#IDComment52471774</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>