I find it interesting that people want to do away with guns for people with permits when ever something tragic happens. The reason it is interesting is it never is the permit holders that do the shooting. Well never maybe could be wrong. I have never heard of it being permit holders. In the case of Columbine the laws didn't stop them from getting guns illegally and perhaps if a gun permit holding person was there the carnage would have ended quicker. In this case, how in the world do you not allow military to have guns?