<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/680831</link>
		<description>Comments by James BonTempo</description>
<item>
<title>Educational Technology Debate : eLearning&#039;s Promise: Will New Models Scale to Educate Youth?</title>
<link>https://edutechdebate.org/elearning-promise/elearnings-promise-new-models-educate-youth/#IDComment63006586</link>
<description>Just in case you didn&#039;t know, last year the US Department of Education published a meta-analysis of research done on the effect of online learning on educational outcomes. One interesting finding: a blended approach - combining online with face-to-face - was more effective than either completely online or face-to-face learning (in order of decreasing efficacy).      A review of the study from Inside Higher Ed can be found at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/06/29/online&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;The Evidence on Online Education&lt;/a&gt; And you can download the full report at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning&lt;/a&gt;      This evidence will certainly be informing our approach to learning technology @ Jhpiego...   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://edutechdebate.org/elearning-promise/elearnings-promise-new-models-educate-youth/#IDComment63006586</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Educational Technology Debate : Should We Shift ICT4E Assessments From Technology to Adoption?</title>
<link>https://edutechdebate.org/assessing-ict4e-evaluations/should-we-shift-ict4e-assessments-from-technology-to-adoption/#IDComment45853607</link>
<description>At Jhpiego we use task analysis of recent graduates to guide curricular review. As you point out, it is silly to initiate educational change if it won&amp;#039;t better prepare students to perform in the real world. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://edutechdebate.org/assessing-ict4e-evaluations/should-we-shift-ict4e-assessments-from-technology-to-adoption/#IDComment45853607</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Educational Technology Debate : Do We Really Need to Assess ICT4E Initiatives? And If So, How?</title>
<link>https://edutechdebate.org/assessing-ict4e-evaluations/do-we-really-need-to-assess-ict4e-initiatives-and-if-so-how/#IDComment42265649</link>
<description>Assessment has been very much on my mind, lately. And I&amp;#039;ve been thinking that a high-level &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/linearityofexpectation.blogspot.com\/2009\/11\/more-better-faster-cheaper-evaluation.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;More, Better, Faster, Cheaper&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; framework could potentially be a very simple yet effective means of evaluating ICT4D across all sectors, including education. I look forward to what this month&amp;#039;s discussants have to share! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://edutechdebate.org/assessing-ict4e-evaluations/do-we-really-need-to-assess-ict4e-initiatives-and-if-so-how/#IDComment42265649</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>