<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/673976</link>
		<description>Comments by inspectorudy</description>
<item>
<title>Weasel Zippers : Hollywood Lib Zach Galifianakis: Tea Party &quot;Racially Motivated&quot;...</title>
<link>http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/07/hollywood-lib-zach-galifianakis-tea-party-racially-motivated/#IDComment417374016</link>
<description>&amp;middot; 5 minutes ago I bet Will Ferrell cringed when he heard Galifinakis say that out loud and on record.   &amp;quot;Buddy, you just became the one person responsible for our new movie TANKING before it&amp;#039;s even out! You just turned away at least half of who would have bought tickets, but are not going to now, all because of your MOUTH.&amp;quot;  Surely you jest! Ferrell is the most disgusting idiot in Hollywood and says things all of the time insulting Republicans, TEA partiers and conservatives. I do not know who he thinks is left that he hasn&amp;#039;t insulted that will go and see his crappy movies. He is on my NFW list along with about 100 other morons. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Aug 2012 22:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/07/hollywood-lib-zach-galifianakis-tea-party-racially-motivated/#IDComment417374016</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Weasel Zippers : Hollywood Lib Zach Galifianakis: Tea Party &quot;Racially Motivated&quot;...</title>
<link>http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/07/hollywood-lib-zach-galifianakis-tea-party-racially-motivated/#IDComment417330979</link>
<description>Do ya think the Blacks voted racially last time? How about next time? Did the fact that Obama got over 50% of the white vote mean anything to you? Did the fact that Andrew Brietbart offered $100,000 to anyone who could prove ANY racial animosity at the big DC event have any affect on your logic? If the TEA party is in way over it&amp;#039;s head where does leave Obama? The TEA party only asks for governmental restraint and more respect for the electorate so how can they be in over their heads?. I&amp;#039;ll bet you were one of the OWS boys weren&amp;#039;t you? Have you looked at their agenda? Did you see what they did to everything they touched? Do you have a f**king clue about anything? You are now part of my NFW (No F**king Watch) list that I adhere to absolutely. Ask my wife.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Aug 2012 21:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/07/hollywood-lib-zach-galifianakis-tea-party-racially-motivated/#IDComment417330979</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Weasel Zippers : Pic of The Day: Mooch Mesmerized By Sight Of White Baby...</title>
<link>http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/06/pic-of-the-day-mooch-mesmerized-by-sight-of-white-baby/#IDComment416898813</link>
<description>I think she is asking for some mustard to go with the baby back ribs! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Aug 2012 06:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://weaselzippers.us/2012/08/06/pic-of-the-day-mooch-mesmerized-by-sight-of-white-baby/#IDComment416898813</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Romney Camp Blames Blunt Amendment Answer On &#039;Confusing&#039; Question *UPDATED: Statement Released</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/29/romney-camp-blames-confusing-blunt-amendment-answer-on-confusing-question/#IDComment305191847</link>
<description>This a lot to do about nothing. I am not a big Romney fan but give him a break on this. He is getting asked a million questions per day and getting a question on  this bill that hasn&amp;#039;t been widely talked about is not that well known is not important. He should have said please refresh my memory on the details of this bill.  I think he may have other things on his mind right now than some obscure bill that no one wants to bring up at this moment except Demorats. Look, can&amp;#039;t we get the hell away from contraception and abortion and focus on Obama and his nation killing tactics? Look at the mess Santorum is in over this stuff. Instead of explaining his vision for our country and his remedies for Obama&amp;#039;s messes he is having to talk about contraception and the evils it has caused. Good Grief! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/29/romney-camp-blames-confusing-blunt-amendment-answer-on-confusing-question/#IDComment305191847</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Romney Camp Blames Blunt Amendment Answer On &#039;Confusing&#039; Question *UPDATED: Statement Released</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/29/romney-camp-blames-confusing-blunt-amendment-answer-on-confusing-question/#IDComment305188234</link>
<description>Herman did the same thing on the &amp;quot;Right of Return&amp;quot; for Palestinians to Israel. He was for it until the next day when he was against it. Same with the infamous &amp;quot;N*gger&amp;quot; rock on Gov. Perry&amp;#039;s Dad&amp;#039;s hunting property that he rented. He was against Perry and called him troublesome until Perry explained it the next day. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 05:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/29/romney-camp-blames-confusing-blunt-amendment-answer-on-confusing-question/#IDComment305188234</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NYT&#039;s Charles Blow Mocks Romney&#039;s &quot;Magic Underwear&quot;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300667229</link>
<description>This is the same idiot that wrote a biased piece in the NYT about the Tea Party. The only problem with his story is that he had never been to a Tea Party event. He only interviewed some of his leftist friends to get the facts. This is what the NYT has sunk to.  Also, we are seeing more and more of the left that have extremely thin skin. They whine and complain about everything that exposes them for the hypocrites they are. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/23/nyts-charles-blow-mocks-romneys-magic-underwear/#IDComment300667229</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : ESPN&#039;s Historic Racial Slur</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/20/espns-historic-racial-slur/#IDComment297316164</link>
<description>There are channels that I have to watch once in a great while and ESPN is one of them. MSNBC is another. I hate them and I hate the people that work for them. If I could vote for their existence I would terminate them tomorrow. Like the writer said just try to imagine if FNC had used this meme! Holder would start an investigation into the motives of Murdoch. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/20/espns-historic-racial-slur/#IDComment297316164</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : ESPN&#039;s Historic Racial Slur</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/20/espns-historic-racial-slur/#IDComment297313775</link>
<description>You are making this writer&amp;#039;s case for him. He just said that ESPN and the liberal media support each other when it promotes their views but they condemn it when it does not. As to your view that &amp;quot;Can&amp;#039;t we all get along&amp;quot; and your Barkley mention, try asking yourself if he, Barkley, was on a trampoline and FNC said &amp;quot;The jig is up&amp;quot; how that would be perceived by the msm. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/20/espns-historic-racial-slur/#IDComment297313775</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Tribune&#039;s Page Flat Out Lies About Santorum&#039;s Contraception Position</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/wapos-robinson-flat-out-lies-about-santorums-contraception-position/#IDComment296906976</link>
<description>What is so ironic is that the fool DeeDee Myers actually said that women did not want Santorum&amp;#039;s advice on birth control but she fails to see that Obama has just mandated not only advice but policy! Liberals are so dumb when it comes to their inability to see their own biases and double standards.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 04:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/wapos-robinson-flat-out-lies-about-santorums-contraception-position/#IDComment296906976</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Beck&#039;s Blaze Doubles Down On Palin Smear, Writer Scrubs &#039;Whore&#039; Tweet</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment289266102</link>
<description>You must think that a blogger just up and posts on his site without any review. If Beck allows that then he is a lot dumber than he looks and if he does review it and then allows crap like this then he is no better than Scarry. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment289266102</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Beck&#039;s Blaze Doubles Down On Palin Smear, Writer Scrubs &#039;Whore&#039; Tweet</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment289264797</link>
<description>I personally hold every blog owner accountable for what is posted on his/her web site. Case in point is the Daily Crawler run and operated by the gutless Tucker Carlson. He actually posted and article by some dip s**t about an interview with, wait for it, Mike Tyson commenting about how one of his over endowed friends wanted to rearrange Palin&amp;quot;s womb and push it up into her throat! Then he, Carlson, was caught tweeting with the other phony  Erick Erickson and commented  MILF Palin. These slime balls need to be called out for their behavior. If they want respect then they have to offer it to not only their readers but to the subjects of their articles. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment289264797</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Beck&#039;s Blaze Doubles Down On Palin Smear, Writer Scrubs &#039;Whore&#039; Tweet</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment289258148</link>
<description>This is the same BS Ron Paul uses on his racist news letter. The buck stops at the top bubba. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment289258148</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Beck&#039;s Blaze Doubles Down On Palin Smear, Writer Scrubs &#039;Whore&#039; Tweet</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment289256740</link>
<description>But she didn&amp;#039;t sell out you idiot. She wrote a piece that a lot of families that have Down Syndrome children needed to hear and who  need reassurance from other parents who have experience with their own Down children. How in the hell is that selling out? She had  a chance to do something good for others and you are calling it a sell out! You are so like all of the others who never bother to read any of the true things she has done and instead do like this dirt bag Beck and smear her without any chance to rebut his nonsense. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment289256740</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt Hammers NBC News&#039; Gregory For Parroting Obama Talking Points</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-nbc-news-gregory-for-parroting-obama-talking-points/#IDComment285464197</link>
<description>What Newt does so well is what all of the other candidates should also do and that is call out the msm  when they ask a stupid or loaded question. Romney is the worst in that he smiles throughout the question as if it is a perfectly normal question. The only time he got huffy was with Sean Hannity and the questions were good questions about Romney care.  I am sickened by the way Republicans go onto liberal shows and then kowtow to the questions or the anchors. Where are the balls needed to be president in evidence from any of this group except Newt? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-hammers-nbc-news-gregory-for-parroting-obama-talking-points/#IDComment285464197</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : James O’Keefe Sues New Jersey Star-Ledger for Defamation after New Hampshire Voter Fraud </title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/30/james-okeefe-sues-the-new-jersey-star-ledger-for-defamation-after-new-hampshire-voter-fraud-expose/#IDComment280230184</link>
<description>Actually the editors should be held personally accountable for non-mistakes like this where they know that what they are printing is a lie. A little prison time might be in order. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Feb 2012 00:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/01/30/james-okeefe-sues-the-new-jersey-star-ledger-for-defamation-after-new-hampshire-voter-fraud-expose/#IDComment280230184</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Et Tu, Real Clear Politics? You&#039;re Breaking My Heart with the Fact-Checking</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/28/et-tu-real-clear-politics-youre-breaking-my-heart-with-the-fact-checking/#IDComment277229672</link>
<description>I think this fool must have interviewed the Dixie Chicks. Only Islamist and dictators have any affection for Obama. Our traditional allies no longer trust us to do what we say or to be there for them if they need us. If you go to any inner city you will find 100% favor for Obama. Does that mean that he is liked and respected by 100% of American citizens?  What an idiot. I too like and respect  RCP but I hope that I do not see more articles by this half wit. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/28/et-tu-real-clear-politics-youre-breaking-my-heart-with-the-fact-checking/#IDComment277229672</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Piers Morgan To Santorum: Would You Let Your Daughter Get An Abortion After Rape?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/piers-morgan-to-santorum-would-you-let-your-daughter-get-an-abortion-after-rape/#IDComment272299722</link>
<description>You are wrong. I was a member of the Airline Pilots Association of America for over thirty years and not once did I get any option to NOT pay my union dues or to get a part back.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/piers-morgan-to-santorum-would-you-let-your-daughter-get-an-abortion-after-rape/#IDComment272299722</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Piers Morgan To Santorum: Would You Let Your Daughter Get An Abortion After Rape?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/piers-morgan-to-santorum-would-you-let-your-daughter-get-an-abortion-after-rape/#IDComment272296110</link>
<description>Lam you are wrong. No liberal will ever be asked this question and if they were asked they would not answer it. This does not prove Santorum is brave but to me proves that his self righteous. Dukakis proved how dumb it is to answer stupid questions. Santorum makes me a little uncomfortable with his constant attention to abortion, of which I am opposed except in two situations, and his attitude that if you disagree with him you are dirt on his shoe. This election is about our ship of country SINKING if Obama is reelected and not about social or religious issues. This is why I think he will not rise above his third or forth place position. Newt was right when he said that Santorum is not intellectually suited for big ideas or big solutions. Santorum makes it a badge of honor that he has not changed on any issue. Is that what you want in a leader? One that never listens to new ideas or facts that may require a change in position? He acts like being rigid is something to be proud of. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/piers-morgan-to-santorum-would-you-let-your-daughter-get-an-abortion-after-rape/#IDComment272296110</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : *Election Night Special* Breitbart News South Carolina Primary Coverage</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/21/election-night-special-breitbart-news-south-carolina-primary-coverage/#IDComment270980495</link>
<description>I agree with you John. Santorum was on my short list until the last debate. He was so petty and thin skinned that I was repulsed by him. He cannot talk about the future but only the past and his stand on abortion when he was three years old. I want someone who has gone through the same stages of life that I have and thought about the same things that I have thought about. I have changed my mind on some big items in my lifetime and I appreciate the thoughtfulness that a change requires. Not all of us are born to never deviate or have second thoughts. I have had experiences that have changed my opinions and I value someone else who has gone through the same fires that I walked through. Santorum acts like he has never thought about anything and has never changed his mind on anything and he is PROUD of it. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 04:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/21/election-night-special-breitbart-news-south-carolina-primary-coverage/#IDComment270980495</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : *Election Night Special* Breitbart News South Carolina Primary Coverage</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/21/election-night-special-breitbart-news-south-carolina-primary-coverage/#IDComment270976633</link>
<description>Have you not even thought about climate change? Did all of the articles in the news and papers not pique your interest a little? To jump on Newt because he opted for the first wave of scientific mumbo jumbo may be his fault but it is not fatal.  As most would agree if you err on the side of doing clean green things to our environment it is better than doing nothing. Why use the term &amp;quot;Slimy&amp;quot;? You may not like Newt&amp;#039;s approach to things but he is ALWAYS looking for a solution. You may not like his solutions but compare them to Obama&amp;#039;s. Oh wait, he doesn&amp;#039;t have any except tax the rich. Vet Newt? Are you kidding? Only Sarah Palin has endured more negative press than Newt. A lot of his is deserved but still you know almost everything he has ever done. Is he a pragmatist? Yes. Does he come up with grandiose ideas? Yes. Can he figure a way out of the mess Obama has put us into? Yes. The worst thing we can get now is a moderate who will nibble around the edges. We need a hammer!  </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 04:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/01/21/election-night-special-breitbart-news-south-carolina-primary-coverage/#IDComment270976633</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>