Connect with gylcol

gylcol has not added any external profiles yet.

My blogs/sites
People I'm following

gylcol is not following anybody.

gylcol

gylcol

12p

8 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0

15 years ago @ Glad Dads | Fatherhood... - Book Review & Giveaway... · 1 reply · +4 points

Being a dad means I get to do the job I have always wanted and get to leave the one I never did.

15 years ago @ Our Rising Sound - Michael P. Vigilante I... · 1 reply · +1 points

And you just hide behind your guitar up there afraid to let the Spirit move you.

15 years ago @ http://wwwjackbenimble... - Building The Blog- Wor... · 1 reply · +1 points

Excited to see what the bigger and better blog will be.

16 years ago @ Clark Kent's Lunc... - Here\'s Your Sign: Gue... · 0 replies · +1 points

Will head over and check it out.

16 years ago @ Glad Dads | Fatherhood... - A Glimpse Into The Lif... · 0 replies · +2 points

Sounds like the two of you make a great team.

16 years ago @ Clark Kent's Lunc... - The Random Thoughts Of... · 0 replies · +1 points

Just recently came upon Jack B but love the posts

16 years ago @ Good Men Project - Fading Fatherly Skills · 0 replies · +1 points

Great point, I look forward to teaching my kids a number of things my dad taught me including how to hot wire a car!

17 years ago @ Pastor Aaron Dailey Blog - Is a woman supposed to... · 1 reply · +1 points

Sorry I don't know how this works, I posted another comment instead of replying to this. Chalk it up to my ignorance. If you look at the context of the scripture you have there the whole bit before is talking about widows and how to properly deal with them. Is it your thought that it then deals with fatherhood for the last part and then goes back to widows? Or is Paul still talking about the widows in your family that need to be provided for, looked after, cared for. Either way just looking at this from a monetary view is a limited view. We have more ways to provide then just earning money. That is where I am coming from in my disagreement with the interpretation of the scripture. I know you didn't mean it but your reply struck me as condecending to me and that may just be because that is how my comment struck you. I am sorry if it did, I just wanted to repsectfully disagree with an interepretation of scripture that I felt was incorrect. Not trying to be controversial just trying to add to the conversation.
an Automattic logo Company

Home Features About Press Developers Help

© 2026 Automattic Inc. TOS | Privacy Policy | Privacy Notice for California Users