grigs
9p6 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
16 years ago @ Cloud Four - Twitter's New Retweet ... · 0 replies · +1 points
Copy and paste doesn't address most of the issues I listed above. FWIW, the developer of Tweetie doesn't think the discussion is silly:
http://twitter.com/tweetie/status/6240742965
http://twitter.com/tweetie/status/6241001152
http://twitter.com/tweetie/status/6241021911
In that last tweet, he talks about working with Twitter to get some of the suggestions in this article implemented.
16 years ago @ Cloud Four - Twitter's New Retweet ... · 0 replies · +1 points
FWIW, I have in fact read Chris Messina's post that you link to. Chris contradicts your comment about RT not having meaning:
"The concept is simple and already widely used: sometimes you want to give credit to someone (as part of the pay-it-forward link economy) for something they said or linked to, without quoting them verbatim (which is what RT or “retweeting” is for, in my estimation and use)."
Chris suggests as an alternative specifically because it has different meaning.
But realistically, this isn't a question of whether to use via vs. RT. The issues enumerated in the article like the lack of retweets showing up in lists and the fact that you can't get notification of retweets so that you can participate in the conversation are bigger issues than whether or not we use the word 'via' instead of 'RT.'
16 years ago @ Cloud Four - Twitter's New Retweet ... · 2 replies · +1 points
Note, doing so will delete all of Tweetie's data including save searches, settings and passwords. You'll have to reset all of those.
The other alternative is to stick with Tweetie and use the quote feature and edit if needed. Then provide feedback to Twitter (and by extension Tweetie). That's what I ultimately decided after struggling with whether or not I wanted to downgrade my version of Tweetie.
16 years ago @ Cloud Four - Twitter's New Retweet ... · 0 replies · +1 points
16 years ago @ Cloud Four - Freedom Time: Google V... · 0 replies · +1 points
My point wasn't that we need entirely open source phones. I'm a freedom of speech advocate, not necessarily an open source advocate. I don't care that my iPhone has a closed operating system as long as I have the freedom to do what I want on the phone. Some will argue that the open source is the only way to get that, but I feel fine with the balance struck in Mac OS X between open source and proprietary software.
I find Open Mobile Consortium interesting because it is an example of how in other countries we need to mobile solutions simply to ensure that people have freedom of speech, but in the United States we're quick to hand that right that others are fighting for over for the expediency of the App Store and its goodies.
I hope the Open Mobile Consortium is successful, but I doubt I will ever own one of the phones that they produce.
16 years ago @ Cloud Four - Freedom Time: Google V... · 0 replies · +1 points
I am actually less worried about carrier constraints on the mobile web than I am on having the mobile web mature into something that provides the tools we need to build applications and businesses around. But I'm happy to see the FCC taking on the issue.
Thanks for commenting.
* In the interest of full disclosure, Julius Genachowski championed the creation of an iPhone application for the Obama campaign. I have never met him personally, but would likely have not had the opportunity to work on the Obama iPhone app without his advocacy for the project.