<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/645143</link>
		<description>Comments by gdawgg</description>
<item>
<title>The FAA Follies : Backwards compatibility costs extra!</title>
<link>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1441#IDComment32625646</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not sure where you are gettinmg your info on it working, but maybe it&amp;#039;s just a center point of view.  I can&amp;#039;t tell you how many times I&amp;#039;ve had to speed up aircraft the center has slowed down or told them not to spin somebody who was &amp;quot;early&amp;quot;.  It&amp;#039;s trash as far as the terminal is concerned.  STARS was and is abysmal compared to ARTS IIIE.  Stil would like to have actual weather on my scope instead of weather presentations that were more accurat in equipment used 20 years ago. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1441#IDComment32625646</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>