IntenseDebate - freebird

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Hamas tal... · 0 replies · +4 points

Whats funny is the comment was in the context of your ignorance and stupidity yet you are worried about being able to breed. Very telling. For one thing I am not little. Second thing I am not a Christian.The third I am not a hypocrite. The fourth, and most important thing, I stand by what I said to you. You're an idiot and comments like this one from you today prove it.

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 1 reply · +4 points

You're right Abu, but you have to admit it is fun to watch such a meltdown. He mad e a mistake joining that death cult and he knows it. Now he is trying to assuage his misgivings any way he can.

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 3 replies · +5 points

What the hell does veteran status have to do with this argument. You have made multiple references to it today. Whats wrong Mikey islam got you down. don't worry, you could apostosize and be free. Of course if you do that you would have to leave your community or suffer the consequences, but hey you got yourself into that mess. I wish you luck!

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 0 replies · +7 points

I think Abu was referring to the problems since the invasion and in which case he is spot on. The main problem in Iraq has been 'sectarian' violence and Iranian interference via assisting the Shia. Abu is right and once again you are wrong Mikey.

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 0 replies · +6 points

Mikey Said:
Where is your blogg screaming against Timothy Mcveigh? How about the one on Eric Rudolph? They were two Christian extremists... but you don't feel anything similar between you and they, do you? becasue what they did was not sanctioned in any way by Christianity... even though they both did it based on their faith... McVeigh visited the Waco religious compound and then took revenge for his "co-religionists" Rudolph was abiding by his interpretation of Christianity. Were they both the rule? No.

I don't believe those you mentioned ahad hundreds or thousands joining them. Why don't you try to find some example thats relevant.

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 0 replies · +6 points

Your problem is you pile all Muslims on top of that minute number committing crimes and label them "same" No. Wrong.

No you are wrong. I believe you were specifically excluded and you are a muslim are you not? Here is what I said: "Face the facts that your co-religionists do not have the same view as you ", there for I do not include "all" muslims. Wrong again Mikey, as usual.

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 0 replies · +10 points

Yup I am adept at crap, I can argue with, and beat you any day of the week. I still have yet to receive an answer about why my status as a civilian is a concern to you.

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 0 replies · +10 points

So what? The first letters in civilian spell civil. And yes I am civil, whats your point.

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 42 replies · +7 points

If it is really happening then where is the spin and bias. The only spin and bias here is by muslims trying to cover the blood trails of islam. Face the facts that your co-religionists do not have the same view as you and they use your un-holy as their reasoning. If christians were doing the same things and using christianity as their excuse you would come unglued (as would I). The fact of the matter is the article is telling the truth, that these events did take place, they are quite common, and carried out by a bunch of barbarians in the name of a barbaric religion. You can't dispute that with facts so don't even try. You cannot justify these actions at all.

16 years ago @ Jihad Watch - jihadwatch.org/ · 3 replies · +12 points

You are like a broken clock mikey. Even a broken clock is right twice a day :)

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with freebird

People I'm following

freebird