<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>fmb501's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>http://www.intensedebate.com/users/410393</link>
		<description>Comments by fmb501</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : World's top scientists to review climate panel</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EBUTQG0&show_article=1#IDComment61323050</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re right on target.  All of the pocket litter data about warming could be true, but every one of the doom on gloom claims was based on unscientific propaganda from extremist environmentalist groups.  Remember folks, it was the IPCC and the extremist environmentalist groups that said we needed to rely on the IPCC.  But the IPCC is just unsubstantiated claims of doom and gloom.  But the IPCC is nothing but lies and exaggerations of unsubstantiated claims made by extremist environmentalist groups.  We&amp;#039;ve spent trillions of dollars based on lies, corruption, and exaggerations.  ENOUGH!  Let&amp;#039;s get on with our lives and build a better future for our children and stop trying to make it worse for our children.  It&amp;#039;s better, safer, easier, and cheaper to adapt than it is to play God and try to change nature. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EBUTQG0&show_article=1#IDComment61323050</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : World's top scientists to review climate panel</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EBUTQG0&show_article=1#IDComment61311681</link>
<description>If I&amp;#039;m not mistaken, didn&amp;#039;t we already have a climate review by what we were told were the top climate scientists in the world and that they had declared the science settled?  And didn&amp;#039;t we already demonstrate that the entire AGW fiasco was the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on mindkind?  Somebody give me a reason why these people are any more honest than the ones who perpetrated the AGW hoax in the first place.  Did any of them speak up?  Did any of them challenge the research?  Did any of them bother to ask questions about the methodologies being used?  Did any of them bother to verify the doom and gloom claims?  Did any of these bozos bother to check the references in the IPCC over the past two decades to discover that it&amp;#039;s based on propaganda from extremist environmentalist groups?  Somebody tell me why I give a rat&amp;#039;s a** what these so called top climate scientists think about the bogus research they ignores or may have even supported over the last two decades.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9EBUTQG0&show_article=1#IDComment61311681</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Brown blames US over Iraq reconstruction errors</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9E8MBT00&show_article=1#IDComment60104459</link>
<description>For the first time since WWII the UK and the US have something in common.  The UK has a moron, Brown, as PM and the US has a moron, Obama, as President.  No wonder that our relationship with the UK is so warm--no, wait, I&amp;#039;m sorry; that warm relationship we have would be with Iran.  How silly of me.  When the terrorist deonate a portable nuclear device in London or Washington DC, I hope we all remember how cooperative and supportive we&amp;#039;ve all been.  Ta ta now. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9E8MBT00&show_article=1#IDComment60104459</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Rep. John Murtha of Pa. dies at 77</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DO6KBO1&show_article=1#IDComment55890333</link>
<description>I will always have a certain amount of respect for anyone who fought for our country.  On the other hand, however, I have complete disgust for corrupt politicians, and John Murtha  was neither a good nor honest man.  May God rest his troubled soul. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9DO6KBO1&show_article=1#IDComment55890333</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama vows to beat 'blizzard' of opposition</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.eeac7f78d2b167aedda59104fadde298.b81&amp;show_article=1#IDComment55712682</link>
<description>At first, I thought President Obama was a far left wing ideologue that would probably triangulate to incrementally achieve his socialist dreams for the American people.  I now think that he may be delusional and in need of professional help.  How many times in how many ways have the people said they don&amp;#039;t want his stinking idea of government care?   Yet he remains committed to ram it down our throats regardless of what we the little people, we the uneducated, we the unsophisticated, we the helpless, we the ugly masses clinging to our Bibles and guns think.  This wouldn&amp;#039;t be such a serious problem if the Senate and House Democrats weren&amp;#039;t running around with tin hats overdosing on the same bad batch of Kool Aid.  This country is in very serious trouble.  Only we the unwashed masses will be able to set things right.  You and as many friends as you to get need to vote in November. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 7 Feb 2010 11:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.eeac7f78d2b167aedda59104fadde298.b81&amp;show_article=1#IDComment55712682</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US Senator blocks all Obama nominees amid tanker feud</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.87436e906866c2a0fc6850afd6ffeb25.2a1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment55511273</link>
<description>Senator Shelby is acting in the interest of Alabama because he wants EADS to build its factory in his state. Here are a couple of things to ponder:   1. EADS has a long history of bribery and unfair practices.  2. The Airbus has a known design flaw in the tail that has caused fatal accidents  3. The design flaw prohibits the Airbus from safely performing emergency maneuvers required of a tanker.  4. The Airbus autopilot cannot be disengaged in certain cases.  5. The Airbus is too big to land on any but the largest airfields limiting the number of bases it can operate from.  6. There will be fewer EADS tankers to service the same number of tanker requirements.  7. The original proposal was improperly written to favor EADS by ignoring many Air Force operational requirements for the new tanker.  8. Awarding the contract to EADS would mean that European countries responsible for manufacturing the parts and could refuse to deliver those parts because of political disputes.  9. If EADS wins the award, then most of our tax dollars will end up in Europe.   There are many, many more reasons why this tanker dispute stinks to high heaven. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Feb 2010 18:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.87436e906866c2a0fc6850afd6ffeb25.2a1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment55511273</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : New Obama plans: 'spend our way out' of downturn</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46434282</link>
<description>Good Lord, will this spending to save Democrat supporters, donors, unions, ACORN and every other liberal organization and contributor ever end?  Just put a gun to my freaking head and pull the tirgger.  All hope is gone and the change is killing me anyway. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF8SIO0#IDComment46434282</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : FACT CHECK: Obama likes both sides of an argument</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF9OQO0#IDComment46374305</link>
<description>If only the MSM would do these kinds of fact checks routinely.  I don&amp;#039;t care who&amp;#039;s making the claims--Republicans, Independents, Democrats, Scientists, corporations, Hollywood--we would all be better off if we knew what the facts were and could therefore make better decisions about our lives and who we elect.  I&amp;#039;d like to see the fact check on Senator Boxer&amp;#039;s latest claim that denying women abortions is like denying me Viagra.  WTF is that all about????  I&amp;#039;m not sure how we connect killing babies to curing ED.  Instead of sending 11 reporters to fact check Palin&amp;#039;s book, they should fact checking politicians.  AP only assigned two reporters to review the 2,000 pages of health care bills--the rumor is that they died of sticker shock before getting to page 5. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9CF9OQO0#IDComment46374305</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Struggling media will need government help: US congressman</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.abd53d78e59f7fcdc66d97d5c358d985.ae1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment45695467</link>
<description>With all of their abstruse mumbo jumbo, it&amp;#039;s sometimes difficult to understand what liberals are really saying, so let me translate for you.  The MSM provides too many votes to the Democrats to allow them to fail. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.abd53d78e59f7fcdc66d97d5c358d985.ae1&amp;show_article=1#IDComment45695467</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : ACORN Document Dump: Trashed Documents Are Relevant to Investigation</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/11/27/acorn-document-dump-trashed-documents-are-relevant-to-investigation/#IDComment45021325</link>
<description>The California AG is doing is best to cover for ACORN.  The AG of the United States is doing his best to restore funding to ACORN.  The MSM is doing its best to pretend there is no story to report.  Thankfully for the taxpayers who are forced by Congress to fund these illegal activities, Breitbart seems to be two steps ahead of them all.  There is one more violation.  Because ACORN received federal funding, it is supposed to be strictly non-partisan.  This means that it should not be campaigning or support for any particular candidate and that voter registration should be party neutral.  However, ACORN is blatantly partisan in favor of Democrats.  It focuses on registering Democrats.  It has been photographed with Democrat campaign posters displayed in its offices.  And it has direct and indirect financial ties to liberal organizations that actively support and fund Democrat candidates.  It isn&amp;#039;t a matter of a rogue office here and there that is doing this.  It is pervasive.  Is there any doubt in your mind how the MSM and the AGs would be reacting if these incidents had been committed by SarahPAC or some other conservative organization? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/11/27/acorn-document-dump-trashed-documents-are-relevant-to-investigation/#IDComment45021325</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ed Begley Jr. Loses It On Fox News</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/11/24/ed-begley-jr-loses-it-on-fox-news/#IDComment44710710</link>
<description>Your are probably right, but I think it&amp;#039;s his wife who wishes he were invisible. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/11/24/ed-begley-jr-loses-it-on-fox-news/#IDComment44710710</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ed Begley Jr. Loses It On Fox News</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/11/24/ed-begley-jr-loses-it-on-fox-news/#IDComment44710034</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve always said that the primary difference between a liberal and a conservative is that liberals act on their emotions and conservatives want to know the facts.  Obviously it doesn&amp;#039;t apply 100% to to either group, but when I try to have a substantive conversation with my liberal friends I always feel like I&amp;#039;m involved in an emotional crisis of some sort.  Don&amp;#039;t believe me?  Visit &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zombietime.com.&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.zombietime.com.&lt;/a&gt;  Ed&amp;#039;s reaction was a quintessential example of a typical liberal reaction to a substantive question.  First comes the raised voice,  then the wild gesticulations, next the red herrings, and finally comes the the fork in the road where Ed begins talking about everything under the Sun except the topic being discussed. To be honest, Ed&amp;#039;s claim now makes me want a peer review on how the air quality is measured in LA.  Getting Ed to deal with reality is a bit like getting bin Laden to convert to Christianity. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bighollywood/2009/11/24/ed-begley-jr-loses-it-on-fox-news/#IDComment44710034</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : BREAKING: San Diego ACORN Document Dump Scandal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/droach/2009/11/23/breaking-san-diego-acorn-document-dump-scandal/#IDComment44484026</link>
<description>Great work Andy and others! My regret is that not all of the offices were covered like this. I bet a mountain of incriminating evidence is in the land fill by now.   I agree with the article as well. If the MSM and the justice system is not going to do the their jobs, then ordinary citizens will have to take on the corrupt. I wish there were something I could to to help besides letters and phone calls to my representatives to investigate the misuse of taxpayer money.   I bet there&amp;#039;s been a sudden run on shredders at the local office supply stores around every ACORN office in America.   I only regret I didn&amp;#039;t think to stake out my local ACORN </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/droach/2009/11/23/breaking-san-diego-acorn-document-dump-scandal/#IDComment44484026</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Exclusive: Police Report on Gladney Beating by SEIU Thugs</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/11/09/exclusive-police-report-on-gladney-beating-by-seiu-thugs/#IDComment42608157</link>
<description>The actions of the SEIU and like organizations are simply the results of  the Democrats&amp;#039; Fatwas that authorize domestic Jihad against non-believers in the socialist agenda.  No surprises here.  It&amp;#039;s part of the union culture--if they can&amp;#039;t win at the ballot box then they resort to strong arm methods.  Actually, most of time the strong arm tactics come first.  It eliminates that time consuming step of having to count the ballots to see who wins. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2009/11/09/exclusive-police-report-on-gladney-beating-by-seiu-thugs/#IDComment42608157</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : PelosiCare: More Millionaire Actors Endorse You Losing Your Health Insurance</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/amarlow/2009/11/07/bartletcare-west-wing-first-couple-drops-health-care-reform-psa/#IDComment42373483</link>
<description>One other thing. I don&amp;#039;t need advice from people who make their living pretending to be someone they are not. It doesn&amp;#039;t give me a warm and fuzzy that they can tell the difference between reality and fantasy. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/amarlow/2009/11/07/bartletcare-west-wing-first-couple-drops-health-care-reform-psa/#IDComment42373483</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : PelosiCare: More Millionaire Actors Endorse You Losing Your Health Insurance</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/amarlow/2009/11/07/bartletcare-west-wing-first-couple-drops-health-care-reform-psa/#IDComment42373260</link>
<description>I challenge all Hollywood actors to trade places with me and still support all of these insane bills being shoved down our throats.  I&amp;#039;ll use their money to live in a bubble where I don&amp;#039;t care what happens to the little people, and they can spend my twilight years in government health care and cap and trade hell trying to find the money to pay for it.  Deal? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/amarlow/2009/11/07/bartletcare-west-wing-first-couple-drops-health-care-reform-psa/#IDComment42373260</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment38031051</link>
<description>I think you have it wrong again.  The Democrats didn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot; believed, fell for, and/or told what are now proven to be lies about Iraqi WMDs&amp;quot; as you say.  During the Clinton administration they were the ones who first called for regime change in Iraq because of the WMDs.  Nice try at trying to make it seem like Bush lied to them.  Bush didn&amp;#039;t make any claims that the Clinton administration hadn&amp;#039;t already made.  As for your list of &amp;quot;experts,&amp;quot; I respect their opinions.  However, it&amp;#039;s easy to sit on the sideline and criticize.  I didn&amp;#039;t see any of these people telling Clinton that his rhetoric was too strong.  The list of distinguished people who thought removing Saddam was the right thing to do is far greater than the one you offer.  The UN inspectors didn&amp;#039;t prove anything.  Ritter didn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;prove&amp;quot; there were no WMDs.  Nor did any of the other inspectors &amp;quot;prove&amp;quot; that there were there.  So where does that leave us?.  Frankly, I think you are too blinded by your partisanship and hatred to be objective. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment38031051</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment38005823</link>
<description>Excuse me trent 1280, you forgot about the whining and screeching the liberals did for eight years during the Bush administrations.  They called him everything in the book from Hitler to moron.  They forged his service records to embarrass him, they called him a cowboy, a loose canon, a liar, and the list is endless.  Now you want us to believe that you are morally superior?  So get off your high horse and face up to the fact that liberals are some of the most vindictive and vitriolic people on earth.  As for the foolish banking practices, I&amp;#039;m afraid that was a Democrat policy.  Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were created by Democrats to offer sub-prime loans to people who they knew couldn&amp;#039;t pay them back.  Janet Reno threatened to sue banks for discrimination if they did not increase their sub-prime loans to minorities.  ACORN and other liberal groups set a record for directing people to those loans.  When Bush and McCain tried to regulate sub-primes, Senator Dodd and Representative Barney Frank blocked it.  While Republicans went along to get along, it was all Democrat policy.   I was and still am opposed to the bailouts--regardless of who does it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment38005823</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment38002060</link>
<description>Are you referring to the WMDs that President Clinton, the Democrats, the UN, and the rest of the world all agreed were in Iraq?  You act like the idea that Iraq had WMDs was something George Bush dreamed up out of fairy dust.    Allow me to jog your memory.  &amp;quot;The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow.&amp;quot; -- Bill Clinton in 1998   The list of Democrats on record condeming Iraq for having WMDs is long and distinguished.  Therefore, if you believe that Bush lied about WMDs then you must also believe that President Clinton, his entire administration, and the Democrats in Congress were also lying as well.  Cheez, you people are amazingly ignorant of anything that happened more than 10 minutes ago.  BTW, you never did say what Obama accomplished to earn the prize. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment38002060</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment37999317</link>
<description>Well put.  You just admitted that the Nobel Committee is nothing more than a transparent bunch of leftists making a political statement about a previous administration.  And so what did you say Obama did to earn the Peace Prize?  Or as you put it, was it was nothing more than a rebuttal of Bush and had zero to do with anything Obama has accomplished.  Thank you for your (probably unintended) honesty. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B7GRQG1#IDComment37999317</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>