Antisemitism is a Zionist tactic. Examples. Operation Babylon in the late 1940s bombed synagogues in Iraq to drive the Jews there to migrate to Israel. This has been the subject of many lawsuits in Israel.

The Lavon Affair involved terrorist attacks on Americans interests in Egypt as is well known, but the same Zionist terrorists were involved in destroying jewish property too for the purpose of scaring jews into moving to Israel.

Several years ago the serial mass murderer Ariel Sharon announced that the prime source of jews for Israel was France. Immediately there were high profile, Zionist press heralded antisemitic incidents in France. Several were instantly exposed as the product of rabbis and jews.

This is not a post WWII phenomena. Read historian Lenni Brenner's works depicting the Zionist cooperation with the Nazis. Zionism in the Age of the Dictators is available free online. His 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis dispels all doubt.

David Ben Gurion once stated that he would rather save a few young jews for Israel than the jews past breeding age from the Nazi horror. Zionist policy contributed mightily to the death toll.

Zionism and antisemitism go hand in hand. They always have. "By the way of deception we will make war," is the Mossad motto. Much antisemitism is this deception.

The American political system whilst ostensibly a democracy is subject to many influences from without. The expense incurred in waging electoral campaigns has been bid up to a point where native financing is dwarfed by external spending. Vast sums are directed from abroad. These distort American values and interests. Specifically, it is widely reported that the so-called Israeli Lobby, as embodied by AIPAC, the American Israeli Political Action Committee, provides anywhere from 50 to 70 % of all political cash contributions.

Consider what that says about the American Jewish community versus the rest of the citizenry and you will quickly suspect that all is not what ti seems. Jews constitute about 2.5% of the American population. Were they to actually furnish 50% of the money in political campaigns how would that stack them up against their fellow citizens?

It would mean that if $1,000 was raised from 200 individuals, the average donation would be $5. But the average Jewish donation would be $100 while the average Christian donation would be $2.56. In short this implies that the average Jew is about 40 times more civic minded than the average Christian.

This is hard to believe. In a somewhat homogeneous society group behavior does not vary this widely. People are not that unlike. Furthermore , the highest civic duty is military service. One would expect that the more civic minded would be more apt to serve in the military, especially in war. Jews are notable for being the only demographic group that substantially under serves in the military. This is so much so that pressure from Jews has caused the US government to keep secret the statistics on service and casualties by religious affiliation. Such numbers are compiled and were once readily available.

This raises the question, why do Jews so disproportionately finance political campaigns. There is no evidence, anecdotal or statistical, that Jews are more freehanded with money than the balance of the population. Indeed, many would aver the opposite.

The only rational explanation that I have ever been able to posit is that the American Jew does not give more than other Americans, but that a substantial number of them money launder donations from the Israeli government which, in effects, kicks back a small portion of the huge foreign aid package that the United States sends to Israel.

This would have several effects that appear to correspond to what the US-Israel relationship is. One,large money donations crowd out native financing, making the AIPAC directed giving critical. Two, this facilitates ever increasing foreign aid to Israel, which finances more, larger donations. In short Americans finance their political system through Israel for Israel's benefit. There is no counterbalance. Three, it makes any opposition,however justified, to Israeli interests political suicide. Politicians by nature seek survive whatever the environment.

MK Berman, chairman of the House Foreign Relations Committee, says the the reason for his action is to determine what happened last week. He did not pull aid to Israel the other party. Berman, a Zionist Jew, evidently has decided what he is going to find, the facts be damned. Berman plainly has no interest in facts or American interests. He is an Israeli First, an American Never. He is not the only MK, Member of the Knesset, in Congress.

To the contrary, it is the people who live by statistics that have no heart.. If a black woman is raped by a black man, and this occurs more often than other variations, you would belittle her horrific fate by whining about arrests. prosecutions and convictions not fitting a preconceived quota agenda. I care about the victims of crimes, you care about numbers, not people. Those numbers that you find hateful are the result of vicious crimes. You look at the two and chose to care about the numbers while ignoring the crimes.

Joe McCarthy was not a demagogue. His detractors were. Time and the Venona papers have proven that he was. almost always right and that the liberal left neocon Smearbundists of the 1950s were were uniformly wrong. It is unlike you, Mr. McGovern to spout such trite, discredited Mommy Professor tommyrot.