fak3r
16p12 comments posted · 0 followers · following 5
12 weeks ago @ fak3r - Red Dwarf: Back to Earth · 0 replies · +1 points
13 weeks ago @ fak3r - 10 Unconventional Diet... · 0 replies · +1 points
13 weeks ago @ fak3r - Windows shows its BSD ... · 0 replies · +1 points
14 weeks ago @ fak3r - HOWTO: install Fedora-... · 0 replies · +1 points
14 weeks ago @ fak3r - HOWTO: install Fedora-... · 0 replies · +1 points
Any advice on dealing with the security settings enforced by the tomcat that is installed by apt-get on debian?What do you mean exactly? I use the Debian installed Tomcat (5.5) with our Production version of Fedora-commons (3.1), I remember that in documentation I read online it told me to copy over some xml from Fedora's install into Tomcat; when I did this things would fail, when I ignored that step and just let Tomcat use its own xml file, it 'just worked'. I'm happy to post the files for review, just let me know which one (or if you don't know, I'll post all of them).
14 weeks ago @ fak3r - HOWTO: install Fedora-... · 0 replies · +1 points
Future versions of the module may store metadata and/or links to datastreams regarding the Fedora object in the Drupal database. This would enable a Fedora node to be used in the standard Drupal ways but also leads to duplication of data and the problem of keeping Drupal and Fedora in sync.
15 weeks ago @ fak3r - HOWTO: conky config (c... · 0 replies · +1 points
26 weeks ago @ www.ubuntu-unleashed.com - Howto: Mount .ISO, .IM... · 0 replies · +1 points
31 weeks ago @ fak3r - HOWTO: install Ruby on... · 0 replies · +1 points
As for using gem instead of apt-get for install - as a longtime Debian admin, i swear by apt-get and it's ability to keep a system up to date and secure. What does gem provide me in those terms? Does it keep things up to date as apt-get does? Again, I don't use ROR for anything production currently, but I don't know about best practices in that regard, so I appreciate the feedback.
31 weeks ago @ fak3r - Amy Winehouse had to c... · 0 replies · +1 points
Thanks for your comment, however I think you've misread my opinion of this event. I thought it was ridiculous that she had to cover up her tattoos, but especially so since the ones in question were 'nude breasts'! The point is, why should any art be censored, and why only for us Americans? We can't handle seeing naked boobies? Come on. Also, please know I hold nothing against Amy Winehouse, least of which her substance abuse problems. Its as if all the rock stars in history never had these troubles? It's only that the paparazzi are on the case that her every (mis) step is recorded and commented upon by everyone; it's terrible, and I suspect it's not helping her recover. I hope she gets better and makes a record that bests 'Back to Black'!
If you want to read other posts I've made on Art and Censorship, poke around my site, it's a recurring theme of mine.
Best.