of course if the author really believed this, he would have told you how many shares of Rommey that he owned on intrade. Of course, since he does not believe his silly blather, he owns none. Being not as rich as him, I will still call him. I will put up $50.00 on Obama. I would rather bet him directly than on intrade, since there the odds are in favor of Obama , about 6 to 4 I belive, So I would have to put up $60.00 to win $100.00

Do not hold your breath waiting for the author to accept

THE WEB SITE DESIGN AND SIGN IN WAS DESIGNED BY INCONPETEND MORONS!!!THE WEB SITE DESIGN AND SIGN IN WAS DESIGNED BY INCONPETEND MORONS!!!

i JUST WASTED AN HOUR, AND HAD MY REMAKRS DESTROYED! FIX THIS SIGN IN PROCESS!!!

tHE CORE OF my REMARKS WHICH i WILL NOT RESTATE IN THEIR ENTIRETY IS:

The author is gullible

Arafat wanted the destruction of israel http://www.iris.org.il/plochart.htm http://thinkexist.com/quotation/peace-for-us-mean...
“Peace for us means the destruction of Israel. We are preparing for an all-out war, a war which will last for generations.”

Most of the statements in this article are either "not even wrong", or where they can be verified THEY are wrong: for example:
An examination of his belongings commissioned by al Jazeera TV and conducted by a highly respected Swiss scientific institute has confirmed that Arafat was poisoned with polonium...
there was no chain of evidence, and no levels of polonium given measured, so one can not possible say that the examination revealed anything about the cause of death.

I am not going to waste more time again finding relevant stuff lost because of the idiocy of those who operate this site

people --- if we need to sign in to post, than have that be part of getting here so comments do not get lost. DAMN!!!

I think that you are confusing communism and nazism. Easy to do since they are just different faces of the government running everything.

There are, of course, many ways of classifying people. I would like to address four questions to groups that can roughly be classified as belonging to one or more of the following groups, religious Christians, conservatives, and republicans. For ease of use, I will refer to these people as RCCR. RS is a caricature of RCCR.

RCCR want an every growing government. They want a military that can invade any country at any time (The Chaney 1% rule), a government that reserves to itself the right to be involved in almost all important private family decisions including what you can eat, how you can medicate yourself, life and death decisions, major health decisions, the type of sex you can have and with whom you can have it. Of course this is all in the name of morality, family, the sanctity of life (except of the civilians in the countries that we are invading) The RCCR wants to use religion as a factor in who can be elected to office. Since many of them believe in the literal word of the bible they wish to kill gay men who practice their sexuality. Given their stated hostility to people like me, an unbeliever, akin to a pedophile, it is easy to see that like the Nazis there would be death camps, the difference being that instead of Gays and Jews being sent to those camps, it would be unbelievers accompanying the queers, since Jews are now the favorite pets of the RCCR. Another difference is that the RCCR currently promotes private gun ownership. Now, if some RCCR feels offended by my comparing them to the Nazis, then explain the invitation by CPAC to people like Peter Brimelow. But other than promoting gun ownership, and prefering to put Queers into death camps rather than Jews, what other differences are there between Nazis and RCCR?

Some of the RCCR will claim that the Nazis were pro abortion: Well no rational person is pro abortion: Rather, most rational people in favor of freedom want a woman to retain the right to make that difficult choice. In any case the Nazis were in favor of abortions only for sub-humans. For real (Ayran) people a physician providing an abortion could get the death penalty) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Germany

Hmmmm.... Lets look at nobel prizes in science Arabs 1. Jews: Lots. I think that it is a rare year when a Jew does not win a nobel in science. Of course the Jews could have bought the Sweeds. Well, lets look at patents. Arabs. Pick any state in this country, and it will generate more patents than the entire Arab World does. Think of a brilliant scienctific or technological creation done by an Arab grown Arab. Yea... I thought so. And now the arabs are going toe to toe in a battle of technology and wits??? Really? Anybody have any doubts as to how that will turn out?

Any chance that some of those microprocessors designed by jews, and used by arabs have firmware imbeded in them with the Mossad phone on speed dial?

If you do not know the enemy [it is ourselves stupid :-) ] you will very likely fail.
Name calling: The rhetorical technique used by those with neither facts, logic, nor the brainpower to use them if available, to present a point of view.

In fact, all available evidence and logic indicates that we are doomed to tyranny, thought I would welcome a counter-argument.
http://factotum666.livejournal.com/829.html