I think an important point is being missed here folks. We need to watch as ACORN regroups and reincorporates in our states. There can be only one main reason. 2010 elections! For that reason we need to know if, when, and UNDER WHAT NEW NAME they come back to our voting precincts. They stole one election. They can steal another.

We need to put each of our election boards on NOTICE. We will not tolerate ACORN by any new name, we will challenge voter registration lists, compare them to death and birth rolls, we will challenge ANYTHING fishy at the precinct level with vigor and legal force if necessary. Whatever it takes WE WILL HAVE CLEAN ELECTIONS. Let the winner claim victory....it's the PROCESS we care about. And that process cannot be tainted.

Start NOW. Sign up to work polls.....hey most pay you for the day....get trained and KNOW YOUR JOB. Pay attention and let local election judges know they are going to be scrutinized closely throughout the whole day.

Take a page from ACORNs play book. Get out and find folks who aren't registered or can't drive, get them signed up and either help them request absentee ballots or drive them to the polls.

We have to do more than talk. The reason ACORN was able to steal the election was they were willing to get off their duffs and do the work. If we're only gonna sit and type blogs, we will not get what we want from this election. Get active locally, that's where the judges are, that's where the old cronies hang out...delivering one precinct at a time till the fix is in. And yes it's happened with EVERY administration. Nobody's hands are clean. But the only way to stop it is to get up and act.

My election judges have been closely questioned. I asked them how they assure themselves a voter is who they claim to be. They said here in Tucson they have amassed a databank of SIGNATURES on utility contracts and Driver's license forms. If they have any question....they can pull up copies of the signatures and compare them on the spot. They have the right to deny anyone a ballot if their registration is questionable. They further have instant access to matching address with names, and with the birth and death records for age and status. All these checks help to assure the voter is who they claim to be and legally registered to vote at that polling station.

Each state is different. Call your election office, find out what they are doing to insure clean elections and then use your group power to put at least one person in each polling station to PAY ATTENTION. Even something so simple as an election judge or official who is just too old but nobody wanted to hurt their feelings, so they get to work anyway. One precinct had an 80 year old woman....been working elections for years....but she had no idea how to "clear" the machines after each vote, forgot to do it regularly, was actually found walking around with the official tapes in her hand with no idea what to do with them....so hundreds of votes had to be just tossed out because of her incompetence.

UNACCEPTABLE. If we want clean elections we gonna have to do it ourselves! We can't count on anyone to do it for us. GIT CRACKIN, LOL!

I believe all the Constitution LEGALLY requires on a census form is the name and number of people residing in the home. Anything else is voluntary.

Now a story of a man who received the short form. He filled in the name and number and crossed through all other questions without comment. After mailing that he received a visit from a census worker. He politely declined to supply additional info, The census taker told him the law required this information. He declined again and asked the census worker politely to leave his property.

The census worker retreated to his car but remained in front of the man's house. The man called the local police who escorted the census taker out of the area. A day later the man received a call from the US Census bureau. When he asked what they needed they asked him to supply THE NAME AND NUMBER OF PEOPLE LIVING IN HIS HOME, THANKED HIM AND HUNG UP.

This leads me to believe that in fact this is the only information they are legally entitled to ask or demand. He received no penalty or threats and has not been bothered again. So if you are disposed to "peacefully" and politely resist providing more than is legally required, you may be on firmer footing than you think.

No eggs, no guns, no verbal threats! Please! That negates your solid footing and puts you in violation of any number of other laws, criminal laws. Just give them the name and number of residents and politely request they leave your property.....then shut your door.

Passive resistance is a powerful tool. Know your rights, understand what the law requires, supply that much only, and give them no other reason to escalate the situation. Passive resistance is both a statement and a protection of your rights. Same for the requirement to purchase health insurance.

What if MILLIONS simply do not, no fanfare, no threats, no broadcasting the fact. Just don't do it. The IRS is only now completing it's mandatory 10% random audits of tax year 2005! They have 5 years to do each year's random audits. How long will it take 16 thousand new agents to verify that 380 Million people have purchased health insurance? And if only 3 million do not....it will take YEARS to find them. By then hopefully this HC nightmare bill will have been gutted. Another peaceful protest of an unconstitutional law.

Same with any gathering or protest march. Remember the 60's. If things get dicey around you, someone gets too verbally worked up or abusive....simply move to the side and SIT DOWN. That is visual proof that you are NOT part of any criminal assault or civil disorder. If your group knows in advance to do this it makes a powerful but peaceful pocket in a rowdy crowd and lets police know instantly you and those around you are not part of the problem.

Sadly most people, when it comes down to it are too afraid not to comply. Sad because if only 3 Million of us peacefully refused to be abused, have our rights trampled, yet gave authorities no excuse to accuse us of anything, it would SHUT GOV'T DOWN. They can only do the volume of work they do because we willingly comply with their requests. If we peacefully decline in huge numbers, they just can't cope with the volume.

food for thought?

I grew up in San Antonio. Trinity is most definitely considered to be a religious university as is Texas Christian University in Ft Worth and Texas Wesleyan College.

And yes I did read the.article, starting with the first paragraph...."In the chaos that followed the Civil War, Trinity University in San Antonio, Tex., was founded by the Cumberland Presbyterians in 1869. These Presbyterians were Calvinists who believed that education was vital to advancing a society."

Are they a religious Seminary? No. Are they a state or secular university NO. They are a private university founded by a religious denomination, named a religious name, and funded by the Presbyterian Church as well as other religious organizations.

Yes it has, Paul,

I pray we can live up to the legacy our founding fathers handed down to us, as we ALWAYS have in the past. This song is why we fight, why we resist, and it is who we are.

The Tea Party will find no better definition than in the words of this song, the images of our flag, and the legacy of this great nation.

What an amazing and heartening way to begin my day. This is what it's all about. Not politics, not money. It is about this song and I will keep it, email it to everyone I know, and play it again and again. It is the one beautiful pure note in an otherwise ugly and dangerous game DC is playing.

Time to remember who we are and what we are and to teach our children well.

Beautiful, just beautiful. Sing this song over and over. Let freedom ring in our hearts and in this beautiful land.

This is just precious. NO really. Kid gets all the way through college without managing to realize he's attending a religious school. Sharp as a tack, he is! Nuthin gets by this kid.

Next he'll spend the rest of his life filing endless frivolous lawsuits against any employer who doesn't hire him, claiming religious discrimination! And with our LUNATIC courts and a blood sucking lawyer, he can turn STUPID into a whole new cottage industry, lolol..

Whatever tax we choose......face it, every year congress will spend the bulk of it's time figuring out how to enhance, expand, and increase it. Gov't is the problem. They are the only ones SPENDING IT. They have ZERO incentive to either leave the tax rates alone or to stop spending the money generated by taxation. Until we get responsible spenders no tax is safe or will ever be adequate. Whatever hairbrained idea they get will be passed and of course will a few years down the road require higher taxes to support it....witness income tax, SS tax, MC tax blah blah.

When a politician goes to work he parks, walks in the building and what? Sits down at his desk to do what? There IS NO JOB except to sit there and dream up ways to spend money and then dream up ways to GET the money he needs to fund the plan he just dreamed up. Other than that....what exactly do these people do all day?

As for the tax.....I make money....just because I do. Yet I spend next to none of it. I'm not a spender. I have few needs, drive a mid range avg car, live in a 2800 ft home, don't take lavish vacations, shop mostly at Walmart...I'm just not a spender.

You'll lose big time if you opt for either a flat or a Vat tax on me. The only way you get 42% from me is with the current system. If you go to a vat....wow, I'll pay next to nothing cause I don't buy alot. If you go to a flat tax, I'll still pay no more than I do and likely less. And I only make $350K so I'm hardly Buffet or Soros. Maybe the Fair tax would keep my rate as high...don't know but I know if you switch to the other two I'll pay less...and in the case of the Vat a ton less.

As for amending the Constitution.....holy carp.....in the current political environment I don't want to open that door to any of the clowns in gov't. Do you? Once you convene that Constitutional Convention...all bets are off and the Constitution is fair game....every part of it.

I'd keep that door shut for now. It isn't the Constitution that's the problem. It's politicians and their spending. Get them under control....spend not one dime more than you take in, zero balance at year end. Then look at various tax plans and see which will hit the most people in the fairest way. I really don't mind paying for some things but for the past 20 years it's just gotten ridiculous....programs out the wazoo for no good reason except congress dreamed up the idea and then told us we NEEDED it or were ENTITLED to it. Horse hockey. What folks need is to be able to be free of gov't in their business, in their life, in their schools, in their homes and their bedrooms!

sorry...rant over, lol. Just wanted folks to see how vat/flat tax could play out with me.

Oh and with the debt, can we afford any less tax? Will we not just pass along a bigger debt to our kids if we lower taxes for us? I sure don't want to saddle them with our spending binge. We gotta clean up a hefty portion of our own mess or they won't see the high side of even $50K a year in their lifetimes. Not cool or fair.

Disturbing and insulting. What is so hard about WHO WHAT WHERE WHEN HOW? That's reporting. Reporters don't editorialize. MSM is such a joke anymore. Where's Cronkite when we REALLY need him. Man...rule of holes is NOT in their repertoire, lol.

compone,

I agree with one caveat. We Tea Partiers need to be more prepared to speak about issues.

Everyone gets that we're angry. That part has been made clear. But the guy didn't need to yell. Why couldn't he simply articulate his positon on the new taxes levyed by Illinois? The other lady was very articulate about who and what made her angry and very responsive to the reporter's questions...even pretty sly when she asked her if she even KNEW about the internet., lol.

Point is when we go to these events, if we don't have facts at hand, decline to be interviewed. But someone in each group needs to be able to lay out compelling arguments about WHY we are angry, not just THAT we are. We need to polish our own skills to speak to issues and have at least some primary facts at hand.

Fight smart people. Don't feed MSM trolls. No more yelling. It only makes us look rabid. We got all the cards....we just need to play them smarter. Gather your facts, make sure they are accurate and then articulate them in a calm, rational voice.

Then there will be NOTHING they can cut and paste to make you look bad, eh?