<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2761</link>
		<description>Comments by Eileen</description>
<item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Thursday, April 23, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/04/22/daily-sucker-for-thursday-april-23-2009/#IDComment19789556</link>
<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;SCW offers the broadest spectrum of IT products, representing over 2000 leading manufacturers. We procure to government, corporate, educational and medical markets. Because different market segments have different pricing levels and discount programs, online shopping at SCW requires an account setup to offer the pricing level specific to your company. Please be sure to complete all of your address information during sign-up. New users click on Create An Account tab above. &lt;/blockquote&gt;   No, the public isn&amp;#039;t welcome unless they already have an account.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/04/22/daily-sucker-for-thursday-april-23-2009/#IDComment19789556</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Tuesday, April 14, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/04/14/daily-sucker-for-tuesday-april-14-2009/#IDComment18757943</link>
<description>I prefer the ski website, too. Bingo, prayer and feng shui don&amp;#039;t go together in my book. And the chat screen taking up half the page? No, just no. The comments in the huge font that appear at the top of the page are something else, too.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 03:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/04/14/daily-sucker-for-tuesday-april-14-2009/#IDComment18757943</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Friday, April 10, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/04/10/daily-sucker-for-friday-april-10-2009/#IDComment18514572</link>
<description>Excuse me? Now websites are dictating that we have 1024x768 resolution and a high speed connection? I enjoy both of those things, but monitors last longer than computers, and some of them won&amp;#039;t tolerate that resolution. I couldn&amp;#039;t get passed the page with the MMN. It was just too confusing. Definitely didn&amp;#039;t  fulfill it&amp;#039;s mission. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/04/10/daily-sucker-for-friday-april-10-2009/#IDComment18514572</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker #2 for Monday, April 6, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/04/06/daily-sucker-2-for-monday-april-6-2009/#IDComment18319707</link>
<description>I like the little truck that writes stories behind it. But it is a mess.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/04/06/daily-sucker-2-for-monday-april-6-2009/#IDComment18319707</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Thursday, April 2, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/31/daily-sucker-for-thursday-april-2-2009/#IDComment17905093</link>
<description>Yeah, and be sure to turn on your cookies and enable javascript, too, so we can infest your computer.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/31/daily-sucker-for-thursday-april-2-2009/#IDComment17905093</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Wednesday, April 1, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/31/daily-sucker-for-wednesday-april-1-2009/#IDComment17904997</link>
<description>AAACK! With a frame right in the middle of all of it. Difficult to read red text for the wish list.  Oh, hell, I see by the source it&amp;#039;s all frames. Yuck! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/31/daily-sucker-for-wednesday-april-1-2009/#IDComment17904997</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Tuesday March 31, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/31/daily-sucker-for-tuesday-march-31-2009/#IDComment17904870</link>
<description>Unfortunately, Jakob is better at math than you are in this case. The non-profit has a $10M budget. It gets 10% or $1M from web donations. If you increase that by 10%, you get an extra $100K.  Sorry. But he does make other good points, too. Like making the local look like the national, and not making it difficult for donors to find the donation button.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/31/daily-sucker-for-tuesday-march-31-2009/#IDComment17904870</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Thursday March 26, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/26/daily-sucker-for-thursday-march-26-2009/#IDComment17677561</link>
<description>Not to mention the tiny text, and the way they set it up, I need to horizontal scroll on my wide-screen monitor. That is, if I have my sidebar open. Close the sidebar, and it&amp;#039;s nicely centered in the middle of the screen. No fluidity to it at all.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/26/daily-sucker-for-thursday-march-26-2009/#IDComment17677561</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker #1 for Wednesday March 25, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/25/daily-sucker-1-for-wednesday-march-25-2009/#IDComment17586546</link>
<description>More flashturbation to hide information.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/25/daily-sucker-1-for-wednesday-march-25-2009/#IDComment17586546</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Tuesday March 24, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/24/daily-sucker-for-tuesday-march-24-2009/#IDComment17541291</link>
<description>Frames on the inside. Long, long, frames. With &amp;quot;back to top&amp;quot; navigation. How 20th century. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/24/daily-sucker-for-tuesday-march-24-2009/#IDComment17541291</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Monday March 23, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/23/daily-sucker-for-monday-march-23-2009/#IDComment17444729</link>
<description>Not even going to try and load it. The screenshot is bad enough. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/23/daily-sucker-for-monday-march-23-2009/#IDComment17444729</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Friday, March 20, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/19/daily-sucker-for-friday-march-20-2009/#IDComment17277507</link>
<description>Real artists ship Steve Jobs? Really? What&amp;#039;s that got to do with anything? If they have a plug-in for Illustrator, they are apparently keeping it to themselves.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/19/daily-sucker-for-friday-march-20-2009/#IDComment17277507</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Wednesday, March 18, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/18/daily-sucker-for-wednesday-march-18-2009/#IDComment17193620</link>
<description>Oh, my word, it&amp;#039;s an infomercial on the web. Lots of Flash, and flash, not a lot of Spirit that I can see.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/18/daily-sucker-for-wednesday-march-18-2009/#IDComment17193620</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker #1 for Tuesday, March 17, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/17/daily-sucker-1-for-tuesday-march-17-2009/#IDComment17191290</link>
<description>Generator- Mozilla 4.73, Win 98, Netscape. They are only 11 or 12 years out of date.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/17/daily-sucker-1-for-tuesday-march-17-2009/#IDComment17191290</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker #1 for Monday, March 16, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/16/daily-sucker-1-for-monday-march-16-2009/#IDComment17111610</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry, the red on black started a headache, and the picture parade finished it.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/16/daily-sucker-1-for-monday-march-16-2009/#IDComment17111610</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker #2 for Monday, March 16, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/16/daily-sucker-2-for-monday-march-16-2009/#IDComment17111155</link>
<description>It must have been built for a wide monitor, because the links show up just below the rest of the text on my 1440x900 resolution widescreen. But it is ugly. The page source is...almost nil. The most interesting thing is the comment in the source that labels Alta Vista and Infoseek meta tags. Do those search engines even exist anymore? And if they do, does anybody use them? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/16/daily-sucker-2-for-monday-march-16-2009/#IDComment17111155</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Thursday, March 12, 2009</title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/12/daily-sucker-for-thursday-march-12-2009/#IDComment16851645</link>
<description>You can&amp;#039;t use DRM music for anything, dummies. Can&amp;#039;t make it play in a YouTube video, can&amp;#039;t make it play on your website. There are places where you can get crappy DRM free elevator music for such uses, but you also have to pay them. Besides, music on your website is so 20th Century.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/03/12/daily-sucker-for-thursday-march-12-2009/#IDComment16851645</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Tuesday, February 10, 2009 </title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/02/10/daily-sucker-for-tuesday-february-10-2009/#IDComment14951329</link>
<description>Again with the waving flag gif. And Dreamweaver would do a better job. If you look at all the little tiny buttons toward the bottom, where the Macintosh gif is, you will see one that says &amp;quot;Spun with Page Spinner.&amp;quot; I had thought that perhaps the Peak Performance thing was just an ad, but no, it&amp;#039;s quite apparent that the same person built both websites. With the same crappy software that was out of date 10 years ago.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/02/10/daily-sucker-for-tuesday-february-10-2009/#IDComment14951329</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Monday, February 9, 2009 </title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/02/09/daily-sucker-for-monday-february-9-2009/#IDComment14906919</link>
<description>Unbelievably complex, and insane navigation. I guess it makes sense to somebody, but not me.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/02/09/daily-sucker-for-monday-february-9-2009/#IDComment14906919</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Web Pages That Suck learn usability and good web design by looking at bad web design -- The Dailey S : Daily Sucker for Thursday, February 5, 2009 </title>
<link>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/02/05/daily-sucker-for-thursday-february-5-2009/#IDComment14791262</link>
<description>Love the title page for New Century Sales that says Index. And the images of the typography are really crappy, like they came from a printer that was running out of toner. Why would you do that? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Feb 2009 03:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.webpagesthatsuck.com/dailysucker/2009/02/05/daily-sucker-for-thursday-february-5-2009/#IDComment14791262</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>