Wow, there's just no fooling you, is there?

2 things:

1) the evidence continues to mount that the current occupant of the White House is just not ready for prime time.

2) I don't know which journalist asked him the question, but when I find out, he/she will go to the top of my dead pool list.

I checked with the limelight, and boy is it pissed.

The important thing is that they never felt more alive....right before the bulls killed/maimed them.

Perhaps next year our Dear Leader, ever sensitive to potential Democrat-voting minorites, might bring in President Bush to tutor him.

This post is ancient, but I had to comment. Little Johnny Cougar's comment "so that some guy can sit in his bedroom and be mean" is stunning. Not only is he clueless regarding the 1st amendment, but he redefines hypocrisy. Ask anyone who has ever worked with or known the guy professionally (and I know a couple)....he's a 1st class, A-1, top-of-the-heap, alpha-dog A-HOLE. Just a completely, thoroughly, ill-tempered, nasty guy. Very demeaning to his colleagues, it's no surprise that most of the talented musicians he worked with at his professional peak back in the early 90's aren't around him any more.

And by the way, Johnny, it's the CONSERVATIVES who have consistently lamented the coarsening of our culture, not liberals. They've consistently celebrated it, and consistently derided those who've spoken out against it. You're simply reaping what you've sown.

....Oops, I see the problem. The excellent candidate for that term is a Democrat, and the soon-to-be-forgotten one is a Republican. And I thought for a moment that it just slipped your mind. Or....could it be...you're not saying Bill Clinton's irrelevant, are you?

The truly fascinating aspect of this "gee, Obama's a man, after all" episode is the breathtaking efforts the MSM (as well as fringe media) has taken to defend something that is truly trivial. This contrasts nicely, and by that I mean 180 degrees, with the efforts the same media took to cover up, ignore, and hide the very credible (according to NBC news) Juanita Broaddrick story. Objective journalism has died. So has reason.

Interesting cartoon, Chris Muir. Ummm, do the gay men know about the label you just laid on them?

Also quite interesting that when trying to answer the question of who "owns the term these days", the best you could come up with was a former senator from a thinly-populated state (very important these days when determining relevance and fitness for high office, well, actually, only if you’re from Alaska….Arkansas, Tennessee, or Minnesota get free passes) whom I would bet you never heard of until the bathroom incident. It seems to me that Americans have a much better standard-bearer, "these days" and for the foreseeable future. Not only was he known to use the power of his position to induce dim-witted interns into putting teeth into the definition of "wide stance", but was also known to drop his pants for reluctant campaign workers. And of course, in his crowning moment of glory, introduced into our national lexicon the phrase "you might want to put some ice on that".....